From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3378A0588 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:24:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5961F72; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:24:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from inbox.dpdk.org (xvm-172-178.dc0.ghst.net [95.142.172.178]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69EB1F72 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:24:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id 54341A0599; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:24:10 +0200 (CEST) From: bugzilla@dpdk.org To: spp@dpdk.org Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 09:24:10 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: SPP X-Bugzilla-Component: main X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: major X-Bugzilla-Who: yamashita.hideyuki@ntt-tx.co.jp X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: yasufum.o@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.dpdk.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [spp] [Bug 457] rte_mempool_create is based on lcore socketid and not the port socketid X-BeenThere: spp@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Soft Patch Panel List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: spp-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "spp" https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D457 Hideyuki Yamashita (yamashita.hideyuki@ntt-tx.co.jp) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |yamashita.hideyuki@ntt-tx.c | |o.jp --- Comment #1 from Hideyuki Yamashita (yamashita.hideyuki@ntt-tx.co.jp) --- Hello Vipin, Thanks for your comments. However I could not understand what is the real problem on the current code. I mean primary process can be run any lcore id which can be specified in primary process startup parameter (with -l option). With -l option, any lcore id can be specified. In other words, either of NU= MA node (e.g. numa0 numa1) can be specified. Original coding (calling rte_socket_id()) is considering above situation. However your "Expected" codeing specifies "soeket id =3D 0". --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=