From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <spp-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15B46A0597
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 13:06:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08EAE1D8E6;
	Tue, 21 Apr 2020 13:06:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from inbox.dpdk.org (xvm-172-178.dc0.ghst.net [95.142.172.178])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 080E41D8E6
 for <spp@dpdk.org>; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 13:06:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 33)
 id D9A52A0599; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 13:06:22 +0200 (CEST)
From: bugzilla@dpdk.org
To: spp@dpdk.org
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:06:23 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: SPP
X-Bugzilla-Component: main
X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: major
X-Bugzilla-Who: vipin.varghese@intel.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: yasufum.o@gmail.com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-457-394-hgjADi8Gag@http.bugs.dpdk.org/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-457-394@http.bugs.dpdk.org/>
References: <bug-457-394@http.bugs.dpdk.org/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.dpdk.org/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [spp] [Bug 457] rte_mempool_create is based on lcore socketid and
 not the port socketid
X-BeenThere: spp@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Soft Patch Panel <spp.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/spp>,
 <mailto:spp-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/spp/>
List-Post: <mailto:spp@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spp-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/spp>,
 <mailto:spp-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: spp-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "spp" <spp-bounces@dpdk.org>

https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D457

--- Comment #2 from Vipin Varghese (vipin.varghese@intel.com) ---
Hello Hideyuki,

I am not clear with your comment, are you sharing

```
even if the Interface is NUMA-1, since you have given core mask from NUMA-0
there is no performance impact?

or=20

there is a performance impact on incorrect NUMA core mask and NUMA NIC. In
current software implementation, since the code is absent it is desired `no=
t to
start SPP-Primary with multi NUMA ports. If there are multiple NUMA NIC, one
has to have multiple SPP-Primary per NUMA to get over the issue`.
```

Can you show me where this is documented?

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=