Re: [spp] [spp 02181] Re: [PATCH 4/9] spp_vf: add BSD license

[Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>]

On 2/16/2018 9:01 AM, Yasufumi Ogawa wrote:
> On 2018/02/15 19:22, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>> On 2/9/2018 7:16 AM, Yasufumi Ogawa wrote:
>>> On 2018/02/09 12:03, Nakamura Hioryuki wrote:
>>>> Thank you for reviewing and pointing out.
>>>>
>>>> Revised patches are posted in the following emails.
>>>>
>>>>> Also DPDK is switching to SPDX tags, that makes license headers easy, we can
>>>>> think about same thing for spp. Not for this patchset, but for future.
>>>>
>>>> Ok, Thank you for information.
>>>> "spp_vf: add BSD license" is deleted from revised patchset, we will make
>>>> change license header for future.
>>>>
>>>> Also, "[PATCH 8/9] spp_vf: refactor to comply with coding style" is
>>>> deleted, because this will conflict with Yasufumi’s patch
>>>> "[PATCH 2/2] spp_vf: update to improve usability"
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Hiroyuki, Ferruh
>>>
>>> Thank you for comments for licensing. I did not be aware switching SPDX.
>>> I think we should add this topic in next TODOs.
>>>
>>> Hiroyuki, thanks for contribution. However, I think it is not needed to
>>> revise license only for spp_vf at this time. We should revise all of spp.
>>>
>>> Ferruh, If you find Hiroyuki's reply after merged previous patches,
>>> could you do not re-merge revised patches to avoid to waste your time? I
>>> would like to update all of files and send another patches later.
>>
>> Hi Yasufumi,
>>
>> Sure, I will wait for your patchset.
>>
>> btw, DPDK v18.02 is out now and available for testing with spp.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> ferruh
> 
> Thanks Ferruh! I will try SPP with latest DPDK v18.02!
> 
> Before update the version of SPP, I would like to merge patches from 
> Kentaro and me. Could you check and merge it ?
> 
> Kentaro sent 9 patches
> [spp] [PATCH 1/9] spp_vf: refactor to comply with coding rule
> ...
> [spp] [PATCH 9/9] spp_vf: change log level setting

I believe a new version of this series sent, a set with 7 patches [1].
Missing version information in the patchset and missing patchwork support makes
it hard to trace.

[1]
[PATCH 1/7] spp_vf: refactor to comply with coding rule
[PATCH 2/7] spp_vf: refactor comments and variable names
[PATCH 3/7] spp_vf: change header file to doxygen format
[PATCH 4/7] spp_vf: add VLAN tag operate function to port
[PATCH 5/7] spp_vf: refactor struct and variable names
[PATCH 6/7] spp_vf: add VID classification to the classifier
[PATCH 7/7] spp_vf: change log level setting


> 
> and I sent 5 patches.
> [spp] [PATCH 1/3] spp_nfv: enable to patch ports with resource ID
> [spp] [PATCH 2/3] spp: add validation for patch command
> [spp] [PATCH 3/3] spp_vm: enable to patch ports with resource ID
> [spp] [PATCH 1/2] spp: update to improve usability
> [spp] [PATCH 2/2] spp_vf: update to improve usability

Sure I will get these.

Thanks,
ferruh

> 
> Thanks,
> Yasufumi
> 
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Yasufumi
>>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
>