From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga17.intel.com (mga17.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C46B81B28E for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 15:40:36 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Feb 2018 06:40:35 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,519,1511856000"; d="scan'208";a="20683249" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.35]) ([10.237.220.35]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Feb 2018 06:40:34 -0800 To: Yasufumi Ogawa Cc: Nakamura Hioryuki , spp@dpdk.org References: <201802080556.w185uBLt011286@imss03.silk.ntt-tx.co.jp> <62f1b786-d541-bd82-4618-4e192f088ddc@intel.com> <201802090303.w1933nd3014061@ccmail03.silk.ntt-tx.co.jp> <559c62e1-425f-8a9d-5395-c067ef0453e3@lab.ntt.co.jp> <4b69b78a-832a-35a0-b82e-932ec49e5629@lab.ntt.co.jp> From: Ferruh Yigit Message-ID: Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 14:40:34 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4b69b78a-832a-35a0-b82e-932ec49e5629@lab.ntt.co.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [spp] [spp 02181] Re: [PATCH 4/9] spp_vf: add BSD license X-BeenThere: spp@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Soft Patch Panel List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 14:40:37 -0000 On 2/16/2018 9:01 AM, Yasufumi Ogawa wrote: > On 2018/02/15 19:22, Ferruh Yigit wrote: >> On 2/9/2018 7:16 AM, Yasufumi Ogawa wrote: >>> On 2018/02/09 12:03, Nakamura Hioryuki wrote: >>>> Thank you for reviewing and pointing out. >>>> >>>> Revised patches are posted in the following emails. >>>> >>>>> Also DPDK is switching to SPDX tags, that makes license headers easy, we can >>>>> think about same thing for spp. Not for this patchset, but for future. >>>> >>>> Ok, Thank you for information. >>>> "spp_vf: add BSD license" is deleted from revised patchset, we will make >>>> change license header for future. >>>> >>>> Also, "[PATCH 8/9] spp_vf: refactor to comply with coding style" is >>>> deleted, because this will conflict with Yasufumi’s patch >>>> "[PATCH 2/2] spp_vf: update to improve usability" >>>> >>> >>> Hi Hiroyuki, Ferruh >>> >>> Thank you for comments for licensing. I did not be aware switching SPDX. >>> I think we should add this topic in next TODOs. >>> >>> Hiroyuki, thanks for contribution. However, I think it is not needed to >>> revise license only for spp_vf at this time. We should revise all of spp. >>> >>> Ferruh, If you find Hiroyuki's reply after merged previous patches, >>> could you do not re-merge revised patches to avoid to waste your time? I >>> would like to update all of files and send another patches later. >> >> Hi Yasufumi, >> >> Sure, I will wait for your patchset. >> >> btw, DPDK v18.02 is out now and available for testing with spp. >> >> Thanks, >> ferruh > > Thanks Ferruh! I will try SPP with latest DPDK v18.02! > > Before update the version of SPP, I would like to merge patches from > Kentaro and me. Could you check and merge it ? > > Kentaro sent 9 patches > [spp] [PATCH 1/9] spp_vf: refactor to comply with coding rule > ... > [spp] [PATCH 9/9] spp_vf: change log level setting I believe a new version of this series sent, a set with 7 patches [1]. Missing version information in the patchset and missing patchwork support makes it hard to trace. [1] [PATCH 1/7] spp_vf: refactor to comply with coding rule [PATCH 2/7] spp_vf: refactor comments and variable names [PATCH 3/7] spp_vf: change header file to doxygen format [PATCH 4/7] spp_vf: add VLAN tag operate function to port [PATCH 5/7] spp_vf: refactor struct and variable names [PATCH 6/7] spp_vf: add VID classification to the classifier [PATCH 7/7] spp_vf: change log level setting > > and I sent 5 patches. > [spp] [PATCH 1/3] spp_nfv: enable to patch ports with resource ID > [spp] [PATCH 2/3] spp: add validation for patch command > [spp] [PATCH 3/3] spp_vm: enable to patch ports with resource ID > [spp] [PATCH 1/2] spp: update to improve usability > [spp] [PATCH 2/2] spp_vf: update to improve usability Sure I will get these. Thanks, ferruh > > Thanks, > Yasufumi > >> >> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Yasufumi >>> >> >> >> > >