From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0B042C29 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 12:53:46 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Feb 2018 03:53:45 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.47,377,1515484800"; d="scan'208";a="22177039" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.35]) ([10.237.220.35]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Feb 2018 03:53:44 -0800 To: Yasufumi Ogawa Cc: "spp@dpdk.org" From: Ferruh Yigit Message-ID: Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 11:53:43 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [spp] secondary applications X-BeenThere: spp@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Soft Patch Panel List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 11:53:47 -0000 Hi Yasufumi, For primary process there is single binary, but for secondary there are three now: nfv vf vm and from their name it is not clear what they are for and what is the difference. Do you know what is the difference between them? And does it make sense to merge them into single binary, to escape from maintaining three different binaries? Or can we eliminate some? Thanks, ferruh