From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9803F2BE5
 for <spp@dpdk.org>; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 11:26:58 +0100 (CET)
X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message)
X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False
Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27])
 by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384;
 22 Feb 2018 02:26:57 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.47,377,1515484800"; d="scan'208";a="29817609"
Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.35])
 ([10.237.220.35])
 by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Feb 2018 02:26:55 -0800
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
 Yasufumi Ogawa <ogawa.yasufumi@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Nakamura Hioryuki <nakamura.hiroyuki@po.ntt-tx.co.jp>, spp@dpdk.org
References: <201802080556.w185uBLt011286@imss03.silk.ntt-tx.co.jp>
 <f3e11c79-073c-09d6-ff73-d5e09737f583@lab.ntt.co.jp>
 <180a0ff3-a4cf-d54b-403f-2ee287f30409@intel.com> <1545048.PFpTTTFbJg@xps>
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Message-ID: <d6ae82c7-a03a-bca3-8ac2-b95b9fd43e8c@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:26:55 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1545048.PFpTTTFbJg@xps>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [spp] [spp 02181] Re: [PATCH 4/9] spp_vf: add BSD license
X-BeenThere: spp@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Soft Patch Panel <spp.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/spp>,
 <mailto:spp-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/spp/>
List-Post: <mailto:spp@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spp-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/spp>,
 <mailto:spp-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:26:59 -0000

On 2/22/2018 10:19 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 22/02/2018 11:13, Ferruh Yigit:
>> On 2/22/2018 8:10 AM, Yasufumi Ogawa wrote:
>>> I did not think of patchwork. I think it is good idea if SPP can use 
>>> patchwork for patch management.
>>>
>>> Although I am not sure if it is possible to use patchwork on dpdk.org, 
>>> do you have any idea for using it for SPP, or allowed only for 'dev'?
>>
>> I know from other projects, it is technically possible to share single patchwork
>> for multiple mail list. But not sure how difficult to setup or maintain that model.
>>
>> cc'ed Thomas for comment.
> 
> Yes we could do it.
> But honestly, it is not the right timing.
> We should migrate to a new server with a new patchwork version first.
> I can add this requirement in the migration task.
> It may take few months before it is done. Is it OK?

I believe it is not urgent, doing this while migrating to new server makes sense
to me.