From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tama500.ecl.ntt.co.jp (tama500.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.39.148]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76989727A for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 12:04:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from vc2.ecl.ntt.co.jp (vc2.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.86.154]) by tama500.ecl.ntt.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w1MB4IL3011908; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 20:04:18 +0900 Received: from vc2.ecl.ntt.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vc2.ecl.ntt.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09B4A639330; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 20:04:18 +0900 (JST) Received: from jcms-pop21.ecl.ntt.co.jp (jcms-pop21.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.87.134]) by vc2.ecl.ntt.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFB35639288; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 20:04:17 +0900 (JST) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (watercress.nslab.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.13.73]) by jcms-pop21.ecl.ntt.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BCCFE400D50; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 20:04:17 +0900 (JST) References: <201802080556.w185uBLt011286@imss03.silk.ntt-tx.co.jp> <180a0ff3-a4cf-d54b-403f-2ee287f30409@intel.com> <1545048.PFpTTTFbJg@xps> From: Yasufumi Ogawa Message-ID: Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 20:02:52 +0900 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CC-Mail-RelayStamp: 1 To: Ferruh Yigit , Thomas Monjalon Cc: Nakamura Hioryuki , spp@dpdk.org X-TM-AS-MML: disable Subject: Re: [spp] [spp 02181] Re: [PATCH 4/9] spp_vf: add BSD license X-BeenThere: spp@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Soft Patch Panel List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 11:04:20 -0000 On 2018/02/22 19:26, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 2/22/2018 10:19 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >> 22/02/2018 11:13, Ferruh Yigit: >>> On 2/22/2018 8:10 AM, Yasufumi Ogawa wrote: >>>> I did not think of patchwork. I think it is good idea if SPP can use >>>> patchwork for patch management. >>>> >>>> Although I am not sure if it is possible to use patchwork on dpdk.org, >>>> do you have any idea for using it for SPP, or allowed only for 'dev'? >>> >>> I know from other projects, it is technically possible to share single patchwork >>> for multiple mail list. But not sure how difficult to setup or maintain that model. >>> >>> cc'ed Thomas for comment. >> >> Yes we could do it. >> But honestly, it is not the right timing. >> We should migrate to a new server with a new patchwork version first. >> I can add this requirement in the migration task. >> It may take few months before it is done. Is it OK? > > I believe it is not urgent, doing this while migrating to new server makes sense > to me. Hi Thomas, Ferruh, I understand. It is OK to wait for migration. Thanks, Yasufumi > > -- Yasufumi Ogawa NTT Network Service Systems Labs