patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>,
	Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>,
	Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com>,
	Jasvinder Singh <jasvinder.singh@intel.com>,
	Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>,
	Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>, dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
	dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>,
	Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] ethdev: limit maximum number of queues
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 14:15:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01ceb2ab-791d-89a7-37d2-e16be08ef655@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7bbfaed7-665c-63ec-97e6-a805a7b320bb@intel.com>

On 11/27/2019 2:14 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 11/27/2019 2:11 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>> 27/11/2019 15:07, David Marchand:
>>> On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 3:06 PM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 11/27/2019 1:42 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>>>> A buffer overflow happens in testpmd with some drivers
>>>>> since the queue arrays are limited to RTE_MAX_QUEUES_PER_PORT.
>>>>>
>>>>> The advertised capabilities of mlx4, mlx5 and softnic
>>>>> for the number of queues were the maximum number: UINT16_MAX.
>>>>> They must be limited by the configured RTE_MAX_QUEUES_PER_PORT
>>>>> that applications expect to be respected.
>>>>>
>>>>> The limitation is applied in above drivers having no limitation,
>>>>> and at ethdev level (function rte_eth_dev_info_get), in order
>>>>> to force the configured limit for all drivers.
>>>>
>>>> The limit is not device limit, should we reflect it into PMDs?
>>>> Why not keep the limit only in the ethdev?
>>>
>>> +1.
>>
>> Yes ethdev is enough.
>> I thought it would be better to document the limit in the PMDs as well,
>> instead of keeping gigantic max.
>>
>> I can change if you feel strong about it.
>>
> 
> No strong opinion, but not sure if we should document ethdev limitation in
> ethdev, for me only ethdev limit looks good.
> 

... not sure if we should document ethdev limitation in *PMD* ...

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-27 14:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-27 13:42 Thomas Monjalon
2019-11-27 14:05 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-11-27 14:07   ` David Marchand
2019-11-27 14:11     ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-11-27 14:14       ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-11-27 14:15         ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2019-11-27 14:30       ` David Marchand
2019-11-27 14:31 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] " Thomas Monjalon
2019-11-27 14:47   ` David Marchand
2019-11-27 15:09     ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=01ceb2ab-791d-89a7-37d2-e16be08ef655@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
    --cc=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jasvinder.singh@intel.com \
    --cc=matan@mellanox.com \
    --cc=rasland@mellanox.com \
    --cc=shahafs@mellanox.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=viacheslavo@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).