patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
To: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] mempool: fix slow allocation of large mempools
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 13:57:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0e310d2d-3455-4201-6aa9-6f5c7b2032e3@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200109132742.15828-1-olivier.matz@6wind.com>

On 09-Jan-20 1:27 PM, Olivier Matz wrote:
> When allocating a mempool which is larger than the largest
> available area, it can take a lot of time:
> 
> a- the mempool calculate the required memory size, and tries
>     to allocate it, it fails
> b- then it tries to allocate the largest available area (this
>     does not request new huge pages)
> c- add this zone to the mempool, this triggers the allocation
>     of a mem hdr, which request a new huge page
> d- back to a- until mempool is populated or until there is no
>     more memory
> 
> This can take a lot of time to finally fail (several minutes): in step
> a- it takes all available hugepages on the system, then release them
> after it fails.
> 
> The problem appeared with commit eba11e364614 ("mempool: reduce wasted
> space on populate"), because smaller chunks are now allowed. Previously,
> it had to be at least one page size, which is not the case in step b-.
> 
> To fix this, implement our own way to allocate the largest available
> area instead of using the feature from memzone: if an allocation fails,
> try to divide the size by 2 and retry. When the requested size falls
> below min_chunk_size, stop and return an error.
> 
> Fixes: eba11e364614 ("mempool: reduce wasted space on populate")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
> ---

I don't particularly like the idea of working around this issue as 
opposed to fixing it memzone-side, but since there's currently no plan 
to address this in memzone allocator, this should work much better than 
before.

Acked-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>

-- 
Thanks,
Anatoly

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-09 13:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-09 13:27 Olivier Matz
2020-01-09 13:57 ` Burakov, Anatoly [this message]
2020-01-09 16:06 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Ali Alnubani
2020-01-09 17:27   ` Olivier Matz
2020-01-10  9:53 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-01-17  8:45   ` Olivier Matz
2020-01-17  9:51 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] " Olivier Matz
2020-01-17 10:01   ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Olivier Matz
2020-01-17 10:09     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-01-20 10:12       ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-01-19 12:29   ` [dpdk-stable] " Ali Alnubani

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0e310d2d-3455-4201-6aa9-6f5c7b2032e3@intel.com \
    --to=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).