From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81549A00C3 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 18:33:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FE6D4274E; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 18:33:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAEC140150; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 18:32:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C8F05C0126; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 12:32:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 13 Jan 2022 12:32:56 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm3; bh= a2PcdJK7yVT7O8RMQ97f0lEnYvdxH8Aosw3IwznpK98=; b=gjsQ30/toBOQs6ZI jWA4ZpV6aRxESvHQXU9ya5QTmfcG9KKjibzjW0DTCVelzZLGewpFl6YrSg7sp0ZI fPulFDUjyY64rnVvepAqTqeaJLX+UsQfGHFJR8zaopMrHPri4CD9vDqi6c0JZnYR GhDTe//VeAVVIDzG1q4aU/0KZlK3gCH916hzd6J0TqD1OMCHEJE9aIV7b1wCnFQ0 +40x62yvLtA53kDlXu6/KrEmrTaEJFQnGFuhr+kt9395bcoE9ByuI1dZ0AMjD3cX +evxy/p8dGscpn3ia8HHgVGUAQ46gSJ81PQoBxX4aoSzFnSxscBA7QEs47Weq9XK BJnU1Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=a2PcdJK7yVT7O8RMQ97f0lEnYvdxH8Aosw3IwznpK 98=; b=kjJGjIyEBjFK9Odcle1WthehVNv5fr9mDXCRk/QgIk5XhCcLdTchVvRPW xCjjbq9vx/5NBkExGUpKdusBK5NXg3VrkP+jw3xbxnbepbQYlX5d9YWGpen5YyFU CID/G+vgq2WLHICbyACOVmV1cnBI6PsPxhR+2UCfPwP0moOXuWXQRejkqgUzleWX IU26VCEE8PikiGOaKqMpBG6EFlltnlfF1VNVrlSAyblmGI2bC76LShek7+Oyk54u 1829Mu4yMiD/KKW9s68Di3N1BxXnpZkC0Sx1n66RUHLDHBchBIhGTTP9GyOLL0oj glpmpJWYzzgqoPTvU+HcncwNIGV0Q== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddrtdefgddutddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh homhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 12:32:54 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Ruifeng Wang Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org, viktorin@rehivetech.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, stephen@networkplumber.org, juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech, honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com, nd@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] build: add missing arch define for Arm Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 18:32:52 +0100 Message-ID: <10596176.5MRjnR8RnV@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20211217085430.820773-1-ruifeng.wang@arm.com> References: <20211217085430.820773-1-ruifeng.wang@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org 17/12/2021 09:54, Ruifeng Wang: > As per design document, RTE_ARCH is the name of the architecture. > However, the definition was missing on Arm with meson build. > It impacts applications that refers to this string. > > Added for Arm builds. > > Fixes: b1d48c41189a ("build: support ARM with meson") > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Wang > --- > ['RTE_ARCH_ARMv8_AARCH32', true], > + ['RTE_ARCH', 'arm64_aarch32'], Why not armv8_aarch32? [...] > dpdk_conf.set('RTE_ARCH_ARMv7', true) > + dpdk_conf.set('RTE_ARCH', 'armv7') [...] > # armv8 build > + dpdk_conf.set('RTE_ARCH', 'arm64') Why not armv8? What I prefer the most in silicon industry is the naming craziness :)