From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas@monjalon.net>
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C03491B59A;
 Sun,  5 Aug 2018 23:55:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41])
 by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F9C321161;
 Sun,  5 Aug 2018 17:55:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163])
 by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 05 Aug 2018 17:55:48 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h=
 cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
 :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender
 :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=w5tChU+UfftETOrnpSdC42Bw+S
 MSERqi4PG3SvP7fac=; b=VHt+/EV6ypS7QQavKFi3GdCopOZqbEFildAZkNOWL0
 agFMQsmUp2dYWi2AEu6tD1h4s72r49K5JBILlSaeWgYhv+Sp5O6hC1VoEmOD2RW+
 Yr5/TBJPGp+swiAZAqcNN6xwGBspI/k7kLBwqXXUUPUNoSbV5NX7prFfWDtEo7ct
 M=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
 :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=w5tChU
 +UfftETOrnpSdC42Bw+SMSERqi4PG3SvP7fac=; b=FGBw8WzRJccG0YI+QOnTDs
 embJnHo7G/kaxYu3UdKnwf528pB9R/E9nskQrCSLTtlnDv7sjS40NVt27PC9u76b
 NJ96FVvYiVUqkgeolh+/Tgi+7Zd8zax7JPA1JQT+fLUU3uuTLDdkI87Zkq8TJoHh
 l4HqxfXZjyerYMJwExvjSVcNpb3plmDxKd+Yy/LwxZ5Nlqr+SD4pBFwoeLy7zS3i
 sqPWKzmFKeiXJmWZTqF7XmH2ZrO0a/UHflwxUNSOhnNJFbA6SVJQ+NbzEhDmIKwD
 GYjSCVECYagE7InIbRr93PiilB6hcV+ofyWaRAbH0AUsS1lV2Bx2V42zhhpr7YHw
 ==
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:Y3JnWwYgE8eurdbQNgOInMeN_kC6v9fQsEAsBSksfED7UIHNdSvDeQ>
 <xmx:Y3JnWxGVimAbkS3UpwQ4eeXnhy8h5MGSPe2XJwFNY9YRBBMRt1Fb0g>
 <xmx:Y3JnW8LQ8wsuXSfvcQqXPUfko3KJRAAUh7RYIDnqS4LKmN_FqZv2yg>
 <xmx:Y3JnW4dothpVcYtHAexUZNW5u5Bm-ExrQqrcm_KdKipgkJCZ5MDRtA>
 <xmx:Y3JnWxYR43JQafz0i7fEDHkcVpihW0nyb8cklcB_i4VBaLG9pwh2wQ>
 <xmx:ZHJnW27G9YlZkKHaTgyTzrr313madzcyNopMEHv5IVfjBWKA7_H7NQ>
X-ME-Sender: <xms:Y3JnWxe7MPVq4qAYU70XKAj6LJ203LY8kGdzmgwE3nPh7plCPGGQrA>
Received: from xps.localnet (114.149.6.93.rev.sfr.net [93.6.149.114])
 by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 24AC710255;
 Sun,  5 Aug 2018 17:55:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: chas3@att.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Doherty, Declan" <declan.doherty@intel.com>,
 Radu Nicolau <radu.nicolau@intel.com>, stable@dpdk.org
Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2018 23:55:45 +0200
Message-ID: <11360076.HoYMhSRcrZ@xps>
In-Reply-To: <0c16cb66-6ee4-ff2d-6d16-7a3fdd021b0c@intel.com>
References: <1533129523-1407-1-git-send-email-radu.nicolau@intel.com>
 <0c16cb66-6ee4-ff2d-6d16-7a3fdd021b0c@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/bonding: stop and
	deactivate slaves when bonding port is stopped
X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches <stable.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/stable>,
 <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:stable@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/stable>,
 <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2018 21:55:49 -0000

02/08/2018 15:38, Doherty, Declan:
> On 01/08/2018 2:18 PM, Radu Nicolau wrote:
> > When a bonding port is stopped also stop and deactivate all slaves.
> > Otherwise slaves will be still listed as active.
> > 
> > Fixes: 69bce062132b ("net/bonding: do not clear active slave count")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Radu Nicolau <radu.nicolau@intel.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Declan Doherty <declan.doherty@intel.com>

Waiting for opinion from the other bonding maintainer (Chas)
who started to review and has some doubts.

Chas, please do you agree with Declan's ack?