From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C03491B59A; Sun, 5 Aug 2018 23:55:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F9C321161; Sun, 5 Aug 2018 17:55:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 05 Aug 2018 17:55:48 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=w5tChU+UfftETOrnpSdC42Bw+S MSERqi4PG3SvP7fac=; b=VHt+/EV6ypS7QQavKFi3GdCopOZqbEFildAZkNOWL0 agFMQsmUp2dYWi2AEu6tD1h4s72r49K5JBILlSaeWgYhv+Sp5O6hC1VoEmOD2RW+ Yr5/TBJPGp+swiAZAqcNN6xwGBspI/k7kLBwqXXUUPUNoSbV5NX7prFfWDtEo7ct M= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=w5tChU +UfftETOrnpSdC42Bw+SMSERqi4PG3SvP7fac=; b=FGBw8WzRJccG0YI+QOnTDs embJnHo7G/kaxYu3UdKnwf528pB9R/E9nskQrCSLTtlnDv7sjS40NVt27PC9u76b NJ96FVvYiVUqkgeolh+/Tgi+7Zd8zax7JPA1JQT+fLUU3uuTLDdkI87Zkq8TJoHh l4HqxfXZjyerYMJwExvjSVcNpb3plmDxKd+Yy/LwxZ5Nlqr+SD4pBFwoeLy7zS3i sqPWKzmFKeiXJmWZTqF7XmH2ZrO0a/UHflwxUNSOhnNJFbA6SVJQ+NbzEhDmIKwD GYjSCVECYagE7InIbRr93PiilB6hcV+ofyWaRAbH0AUsS1lV2Bx2V42zhhpr7YHw == X-ME-Proxy: X-ME-Sender: Received: from xps.localnet (114.149.6.93.rev.sfr.net [93.6.149.114]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 24AC710255; Sun, 5 Aug 2018 17:55:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: chas3@att.com Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Doherty, Declan" , Radu Nicolau , stable@dpdk.org Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2018 23:55:45 +0200 Message-ID: <11360076.HoYMhSRcrZ@xps> In-Reply-To: <0c16cb66-6ee4-ff2d-6d16-7a3fdd021b0c@intel.com> References: <1533129523-1407-1-git-send-email-radu.nicolau@intel.com> <0c16cb66-6ee4-ff2d-6d16-7a3fdd021b0c@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/bonding: stop and deactivate slaves when bonding port is stopped X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2018 21:55:49 -0000 02/08/2018 15:38, Doherty, Declan: > On 01/08/2018 2:18 PM, Radu Nicolau wrote: > > When a bonding port is stopped also stop and deactivate all slaves. > > Otherwise slaves will be still listed as active. > > > > Fixes: 69bce062132b ("net/bonding: do not clear active slave count") > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > > > Signed-off-by: Radu Nicolau > > Acked-by: Declan Doherty Waiting for opinion from the other bonding maintainer (Chas) who started to review and has some doubts. Chas, please do you agree with Declan's ack?