From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F12F045563 for ; Wed, 3 Jul 2024 18:05:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0F5E42E71; Wed, 3 Jul 2024 18:05:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fhigh6-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh6-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.157]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A114111C; Wed, 3 Jul 2024 18:05:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailfhigh.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96DD711400B3; Wed, 3 Jul 2024 12:05:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 03 Jul 2024 12:05:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1720022757; x=1720109157; bh=4n5xGZOnGyvuimK1Z7AKYtSWLn7AfP5WCveJVxbIIZM=; b= NzZZRy0GBPV85+12KPt+73jv7/YriG0tU459DXQ3yZA6DuvdKk7PNs+07Ck+m+SZ Y5ZvBMzP0iq7Oe9KHGnOY+j0m8BBk6xfQ/3CgojixzsfcGz0vJYjoEyD5mRxTlSz 0IYVnvCvFKm26J1olTNF5no67s1LJCRUlHhLG0laNugZ9dI7vkmDHns8YFF/vwaj zLRO+wbKCCR3EZQZmmN5veu4bGy3gi8CpczQ5gOUVDlpY9iYNOUr/paC3sKAzhOM TYJgX6NL73IbqMbh55RNGB3g6CfY1Uutu5Amn9mvgxyMLbDN9C0qgv8/5oqzWPFi TK/uvDlGGeB9gO/BJKo2fA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1720022757; x= 1720109157; bh=4n5xGZOnGyvuimK1Z7AKYtSWLn7AfP5WCveJVxbIIZM=; b=b TJcj+igyB4zwli1DcAjc+v3u0HiazGgEWMyU10iW+Q8MncO9AvE1BO4n1wgBJmQv E3tJ+IFJwYG6aEy868HCT9jXnD1BMDeul67v08UKAnan2rTGKTIlIYSN8X7weuJi IbKganAd+faUBAXHKP5uH1d8+OjpE6yJOYKtztAUsKU7OCwmjnPijpzHcHrSoYmn Y/QEGte5Lq4Va0eK1GmI1fy2yjTjXzLyVg5843czt9wTeQOCBvyoauN5Ex0UA/P5 nS+k+SPHzY70SaO6lDswDI4+eiNefpWNVi0Zf4Ls868ZxDIYEBMxDiOBFQuQmwVT 9IklM3CllHfrCgvayJpwQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrudejgdelhecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvfevufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtqhertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepffdtuefhhedvkeelleevffdvlefhleehvdegtddvvdduueeivedt gfejvddugeefnecuffhomhgrihhnpeguphgukhdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiii gvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhn rdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 3 Jul 2024 12:05:55 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Shijith Thotton Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org, olivier.matz@6wind.com, jerinj@marvell.com, Morten =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Br=F8rup?= , Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mbuf: fix API to copy mbuf dynamic fields Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 18:05:53 +0200 Message-ID: <12557421.NizCu2HIMA@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20240627075755.66386-1-sthotton@marvell.com> References: <20240626120802.19333-1-sthotton@marvell.com> <20240627075755.66386-1-sthotton@marvell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org 27/06/2024 09:57, Shijith Thotton: > Fixed rte_mbuf_dynfield_copy() API to copy dynamic fields from one mbuf > to another. When RTE_IOVA_AS_PA is not defined during the build, an > additional dynamic field (dynfield2) becomes available. This field > should be conditionally copied to ensure the complete duplication of > dynamic fields between mbufs. This patch fixes the same. >=20 > see https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1472 >=20 > Bugzilla ID: 1472 > Fixes: 03b57eb7ab9a ("mbuf: add second dynamic field member") > Cc: stable@dpdk.org >=20 > Signed-off-by: Shijith Thotton > Reviewed-by: Morten Br=C3=B8rup > Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger Applied, thanks.