From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92A08A0C45 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 18:18:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 866044067A; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 18:18:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from new3-smtp.messagingengine.com (new3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.229]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52C5B4003F; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 18:18:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2ADF580A89; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 12:18:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 30 Jul 2021 12:18:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= BiksHq4WWwXgb7a35he6dRjV5tsQjy5DpIo+/BeGBG8=; b=AByj4bhHBVPJzslE Usv3yMAwx9uiYyLQ29eY9B3UvXdrh9DfGg7WmjHm+1ObAu410ZfE0bFviEUA7MyG 1quFCvzCnqxaLvZ9EJBvsd/IU6uDEOpSN6kC0sSk+XpUpv475p1PjR0BtPqqEke2 p+QrOdqZFyr+zo7dJ/Ui4+LqBsDAj6q3ISvtNKXsOCFuXenbCNp6RweOZTjfEFst /Xwo8U8GyFb9ZuNIVIvTnVh+d7GrfLPjZsJydzTHZ2WMqEloJUDOn3GZ8cRPK8N8 +ijiZhPbA690sgpz709wRxBZwXcYnwCs6pbyix6QVxthpOtHVSxQisMkLK6NxV5U AivCVg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=BiksHq4WWwXgb7a35he6dRjV5tsQjy5DpIo+/BeGB G8=; b=ilzc4xOK5FNA/TgmWpcemJ1e+teEyAP15JsbJSOTilChhmFlQNlhv6qxk mo03GHTelKcXpeeBN2sBChTP9RYQVrMAEB5L2WaDKzJLXRDjpKJKvdhjNHpH5bib Mwxe0Gf7voxrzQ8qJgXu5YG/ObfmjeGjBdmEB4JMzXoJxbAVLVZzbt0/3o9v/edG 7KJKWYRO7qQDtVSFXfSbp8meko29D2XU90y88OtAH3Q6r7+xXadjQ8BeGVzI73c9 uYsMMk1P4OiTgI9wkRShQZI6UMqP6jqHZV+KW+Os4a/9r0y75dZwvB8sH1O8CfHL oPYwiA4+HQG4TniBXUkYLLwBh3Ljw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrheehgdelvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdejueei iedvffegheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhroh hmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 12:18:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Dmitry Kozlyuk Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org, Andrew Rybchenko , Viacheslav Ovsiienko , Xueming Li , Marcin Wojtas , Michal Krawczyk , Shai Brandes , Evgeny Schemeilin , Igor Chauskin , Parav Pandit , Stephen Hemminger , Long Li Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 18:18:34 +0200 Message-ID: <14406363.YTmczRCzET@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20210728220618.1048721-1-dkozlyuk@nvidia.com> References: <20210727102720.902969-1-dkozlyuk@nvidia.com> <20210728220618.1048721-1-dkozlyuk@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v4] bus: clarify log for non-NUMA-aware devices X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" 29/07/2021 00:06, Dmitry Kozlyuk: > EAL: PCI device 0000:00:06.0 on NUMA socket -1 > - EAL: Invalid NUMA socket, default to 0 > + EAL: Device is not NUMA-aware, defaulting socket to 0 > EAL: probe driver: 1d0f:ec20 net_ena The indentation in logs are wrong because they are not all at the same log level. If you run at a non-debug-level, you lose the first line, so the indent becomes meaningless and confusing. [...] > - AUXILIARY_LOG(INFO, "Device is not NUMA-aware, defaulting NUMA node to 0"); > + if (rte_socket_count() > 1) > + AUXILIARY_LOG(INFO, " Device is not NUMA-aware, defaulting socket to 0"); Instead of adding an indent, I would prefer we print the device name. And we should remove log indents in other bus drivers.