From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <luca.boccassi@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com (mail-wm0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B6991B311
 for <stable@dpdk.org>; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 11:16:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id o189so1756878wme.4
 for <stable@dpdk.org>; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 02:16:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to
 :references:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version;
 bh=Ydxepo4MfaL+dlXpv+Y9Om9Qi/NOl5QblyqAhqqoM94=;
 b=FQWgO8JcsScHb6dZPV1u2W1Ut2Iz+I3MI/MaAJ432/j5p5CK1NxTDMb5fWMMHVYWmD
 tjMEpN+XWavRgsEgJeerKAa2XIUjDX7aLuIsvP3SvK2mC64rUjEVlfduTHgooR48wQ9p
 psz2e8apTHQ6gt37/BLvkbYDmaSmIGEwVhcT3ifNsLXdXbkZg9bayhAyyd6rGfrqcgrX
 U6LQFS2fgJUsJna8ZSfl9MYKRwKVVe/KsqHi4zOCmAweYFXLmO1yE52CGpy925UyDENA
 x3PkNHATiToBoNJQJRQLCcqj9/nc6EG2nap+PJ35W8Hk0FyFBxBFr28OvOMgl1qwfJmX
 WN6Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPAeuiV0ue3X+ols/cZfQe/MJiE42dExOrrAmdXZa/EEhjfbtnmM
 KeikX2Dd1UPOP36yuZVn26FZ5dHq
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x226PeYcTfgcA2+jum2FNHj3E7AeEg2IvMb5TRxM1SgUSPZoxDkAGVrSrL8uPZI21Uf98qCjdwg==
X-Received: by 10.28.188.131 with SMTP id m125mr3972424wmf.39.1518603362788;
 Wed, 14 Feb 2018 02:16:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([213.251.34.146])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u3sm519513wre.39.2018.02.14.02.16.02
 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256);
 Wed, 14 Feb 2018 02:16:02 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <1518603360.4059.11.camel@debian.org>
From: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
To: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Cc: dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 10:16:00 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20180214084624.i3mbdl4lhvwl7vi4@platinum>
References: <20180126133039.21641-1-luca.boccassi@gmail.com>
 <20180207191428.14532-1-luca.boccassi@gmail.com>
 <20180214084624.i3mbdl4lhvwl7vi4@platinum>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1+deb9u1 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] please help backporting some patches to LTS
	release 16.11.5
X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches <stable.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/stable>,
 <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:stable@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/stable>,
 <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 10:16:03 -0000

On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 09:46 +0100, Olivier Matz wrote:
> Hi Luca,
>=20
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 07:14:28PM +0000, luca.boccassi@gmail.com
> wrote:
> > Hi commit authors (and maintainers),
> >=20
> > I didn't manage to apply following commits from upstream to stable
> > branch
> > 16.11: conflict happens. I'm wondering can the authors check the
> > following
> > list and backport those patches belong to you?
> >=20
> > FYI, branch 16.11 is located at tree:
> > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0git://dpdk.org/dpdk-stable
> >=20
> > It'd be great if you could do that in one or two weeks. Also,
> > please add a
> > heading line like below before the commit log body:
> > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0[ backported from upstream commit xxx ]
> >=20
> > Example: http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/commit/?h=3D16.07&id=3Dc483
> > 1394c7d1944d8ec27d52c22997f20d19718e
> >=20
> > Please let me know if you have any comments, say, need more time,
> > or it's
> > worthless to packport it. And please send it to "stable@dpdk.org",
> > but not
> > "dev@dpdk.org".
> >=20
> > Thanks.
> >=20
> > Luca Boccassi
>=20
> [...]
>=20
> > 0bf876008=C2=A0=C2=A0Xueming Li=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=
=A0cmdline: avoid garbage in unused fields
> > of parsed result
> > 2acf7432a=C2=A0=C2=A0Xueming Li=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=
=A0cmdline: fix dynamic tokens parsing
>=20
> These 2 patches do not need to be backported in 16.11. The first one
> is a minor bug that has almost no impact (unused fields not zeroed in
> the structure after parsing a command). The second one fixes a
> feature
> that was introduced after 16.11.

Perfect, thanks for checking.

--=20
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi