patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thierry Herbelot <thierry.herbelot@6wind.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Devendra Singh Rawat <dsinghrawat@marvell.com>,
	Alok Prasad <palok@marvell.com>, Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
	Edwin Brossette <edwin.brossette@6wind.com>,
	stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [V3] net/qede: reduce the optimization level for gcc > 11
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 08:49:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <151c401a-87dc-423c-8bae-89d325dc8c90@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250909091724.2ea0615e@hermes.local>

Hello Stephen,

On 9/9/25 18:17, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue,  9 Sep 2025 07:40:23 +0200
> Thierry Herbelot <thierry.herbelot@6wind.com> wrote:
> 
>> The qede PMD stopped working under Ubuntu-24.04 (using gcc-13) when
>> compiled with -O3 (default level for all DPDK code). A bug is opened
>> for this issue (see Link). The same issue is also seen with gcc-12
>> and gcc-14. The issue is not seen with clang-20.
>>
>> A first workaround is to just disable all optimizations (-O0), which
>> restores packet Rx with Qlogic NICs. However, the performance impact
>> is not acceptable (around 50% drop).
>>
>> A better compromise is to use -O1 for the qede PMD:
>> - there is some perf impact,
>> - but the PMD is working as expected (packets are correctly received).
>>
>> When compiling with both -O2 and -O3 and gcc > 11, there is no packet
>> reception when using the qede PMD. The root cause could be missing
>> 'volatile' keywords or missing memory barriers in the qede PMD code.
>>
>> Link: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1379
>> Signed-off-by: Thierry Herbelot <thierry.herbelot@6wind.com>
> 
> Which rx_burst gets used on that hardware?
> 
> Is there any indication of errors (like rx_mbuf_alloc_failed) in the stats.
> 
> The driver does not appear to have any write barrier after updating the consumed packets.
> 
> Would this help?
> diff --git a/drivers/net/qede/qede_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/qede/qede_rxtx.c
> index 25e28fd9f6..1b5109d966 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/qede/qede_rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/qede/qede_rxtx.c
> @@ -1295,6 +1295,8 @@ static inline void qede_rx_bd_ring_consume(struct qede_rx_queue *rxq)
>   {
>          ecore_chain_consume(&rxq->rx_bd_ring);
>          rxq->sw_rx_cons++;
> +
> +       rte_wmb();
>   }
>   
I just checked with this patch, but the error is still present:

testpmd> show fwd stats all

   ---------------------- Forward statistics for port 0 
----------------------
   RX-packets: 0              RX-dropped: 10            RX-total: 10
   RX-error: 0
   RX-nombufs: 10
   TX-packets: 0              TX-dropped: 0             TX-total: 0
  
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

The error chain is:

RX-nombufs
  => (testpmd) stats.rx_nombuf
   => (qede) p_stats->common.no_buff_discards
    => (qede/base) HILO_64_REGPAIR(mstats.no_buff_discard)
          (internal to the NIC)

	Best regards

	Thierry


> 
> 
> 

-- 
Thierry Herbelot


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-10  6:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-03 11:32 [PATCH] net/qede: reduce the optimization level Thierry Herbelot
2025-09-06  3:59 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-09-08  7:04 ` [V2] net/qede: reduce the optimization level for gcc > 11 Thierry Herbelot
2025-09-08 19:59   ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-09-09  5:27     ` Thierry Herbelot
2025-09-09  5:40   ` [V3] " Thierry Herbelot
2025-09-09 16:17     ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-09-10  6:49       ` Thierry Herbelot [this message]
2025-09-10 16:09         ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=151c401a-87dc-423c-8bae-89d325dc8c90@6wind.com \
    --to=thierry.herbelot@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dsinghrawat@marvell.com \
    --cc=edwin.brossette@6wind.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=palok@marvell.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).