From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <luca.boccassi@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wr0-f170.google.com (mail-wr0-f170.google.com
 [209.85.128.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7559E07
 for <stable@dpdk.org>; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 15:38:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wr0-f170.google.com with SMTP id v5-v6so8078856wrf.9
 for <stable@dpdk.org>; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 06:38:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to
 :references:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version;
 bh=M9kqJkQ1LP5YyefDTy9z32+UGUAlSOH7sr3DIwnqdvc=;
 b=lsApKLe/FHtrRBJOP4f8XnTXD1rne/Knr4NalcBIFEbjTQ0elmBQ+1ZtWUw0n2IrRL
 uWseEODQYLZOT2i4jmPtWDfaSzoquJ0OQ3ss2f856kAhqBlTRQHwDKLGq2cs+vuyYkt/
 bsYsRqXOUtFVIEGRQaleMi3N3Br8R0SlWb4EB6MKzhJiknBhCuuy3SXeEIh35Gmw70jd
 0VTYyqcnCfxpU2P9yIBnyN6WGKnBcAcBE4g2hrO1gkv0L7guOsEtjysi44H1kCzW5ekC
 2LmjRhAWvxkWgo/XeY2LOcoP6Qjvsw5qTCLthtz+54UnYMwneMx1hxI0iRfaaGqJxM89
 lKqw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tCNW1HPbmluA00Q/LssQnYwtdSw3DwQc91OZWZT3VX9npebzVCH
 I8q+r0vT5UvYWu5WtSCn860=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZr/V9Eyol3gQ+mZnrvZQQ9VLT7piOPSEnTrQu/5adxzUIH3P2SwDP22zGaPcVy2xtwiKsOVHQ==
X-Received: by 2002:adf:9a27:: with SMTP id
 z36-v6mr8434536wrb.47.1525095528303; 
 Mon, 30 Apr 2018 06:38:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([2a00:23c5:be9a:5200:ce4c:82c0:d567:ecbb])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u196sm7264371wmf.30.2018.04.30.06.38.47
 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256);
 Mon, 30 Apr 2018 06:38:47 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1525095526.23337.17.camel@debian.org>
From: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
To: Ophir Munk <ophirmu@mellanox.com>
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 14:38:46 +0100
In-Reply-To: <1524406775-29471-1-git-send-email-ophirmu@mellanox.com>
References: <1524406775-29471-1-git-send-email-ophirmu@mellanox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1+deb9u1 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v1] gso: fix marking TCP checksum flag in
 TCP segments
X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches <stable.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/stable>,
 <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:stable@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/stable>,
 <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 13:38:48 -0000

On Sun, 2018-04-22 at 14:19 +0000, Ophir Munk wrote:
> Large TCP packets which are marked with PKT_TX_TCP_SEG flag are
> segmented and the flag is cleared in the resulting segments, however,
> the segments checksum is not updated. It is therefore required to set
> the PKT_TX_TCP_CKSUM flag in each TCP segment in order to mark for
> the
> sending driver the need to update the TCP checksum before
> transmitting
> the segment.
>=20
> Fixes: 119583797b6a ("gso: support TCP/IPv4 GSO")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Ophir Munk <ophirmu@mellanox.com>

Has this or a version of this fix been committed to mainline?

--=20
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi