From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f170.google.com (mail-wr0-f170.google.com [209.85.128.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87A7F1B67F for ; Wed, 9 May 2018 16:03:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wr0-f170.google.com with SMTP id p5-v6so35728281wre.12 for ; Wed, 09 May 2018 07:03:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=S30vZcwjsHI7lJ5+i38vWpH33fB3rAeykz98ESnm0rg=; b=thfnUiVPn13ughjjiaz3Wy/ljAz7vk/DWkefs9e5m6h4hqJ2lr27TCi8cUl0UTlSkh xbA6SsuACXZ8RbctEt+pixsUe14PKXVsb+d3wO9OuWxMr0YlQ2XMXUelhJLyscH10qs+ FL85NZmwLBG88jygwTpCpgHT9AAoy7dUjS0GMMNvz4BZR1r/im/A09QVC9/RPcL8xsAn 9ygCg77PtRnsdSIuCPkXfWlc1IFhyCjMfQ4Rv2hMQyqu92OVOxe2NtnT6fjrHG0jB4a+ Xi7sjfpNC0kFokU+xhxRpfeeg6JyAvCOS2f74FqgpxolyDoqkJix+Ihg8svHe9qxZl+9 gA5w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tDuN9bjzkf9ceNb5S0aFw2u1V1zE6AUfPfZHgpGgsD8i4h+JB61 tfe46S60myd7i0650S8YFzs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZoYg90cuy8toqopy2B4ov7ygL94KVRpqgX3Txpdx/y3SN4BctiZfOtU3bBzq2zM8wifCaVnCQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:8407:: with SMTP id 7-v6mr22666944wrf.176.1525874639024; Wed, 09 May 2018 07:03:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a00:23c5:be9a:5200:ce4c:82c0:d567:ecbb]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z10-v6sm15719513wre.43.2018.05.09.07.03.58 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 09 May 2018 07:03:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1525874637.23337.92.camel@debian.org> From: Luca Boccassi To: Shahaf Shuler Cc: "stable@dpdk.org" , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?N=E9lio?= Laranjeiro , Yongseok Koh , Adrien Mazarguil Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 15:03:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1525772984.23337.77.camel@debian.org> <1525773362.23337.79.camel@debian.org> <1525861664.23337.85.camel@debian.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1+deb9u1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 00/33] mlx5 backports for 18.02.2 stable X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 14:03:59 -0000 On Wed, 2018-05-09 at 11:18 +0000, Shahaf Shuler wrote: > Wednesday, May 9, 2018 1:28 PM, Luca Boccassi: > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 00/33] mlx5 backports for 18.02.2 > > stable > >=20 > > On Wed, 2018-05-09 at 07:51 +0000, Shahaf Shuler wrote: > > > Hi Luca, > > >=20 > > > Tuesday, May 8, 2018 12:56 PM, Luca Boccassi: > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/33] mlx5 backports for 18.02.2 stable > > > >=20 > > > > On Tue, 2018-05-08 at 10:49 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 2018-05-06 at 09:05 +0300, Shahaf Shuler wrote: > > > >=20 > > > > to > > > > > 29/33 > > > >=20 > > > > Also many of the patches do not apply. Have you checked out the > > > > dpdk- > > > > stable/18.02 branch? I've already backported many fixes, as > > > > mentioned in the email series sent to stable@dpdk.org > > >=20 > > > Yes I see this now. Looks like there is some mess in the stable > > > branch > > > for mlx5. Some of the patches you integrated breaks the > > > compilation. > > > My suggestion is to revert the mlx5 patches you already applied > > > (starting from 18.02.1) , and apply the series I sent. > > >=20 > > > If you agree I will send the remaining missing 30-33. Let me > > > know. > >=20 > > Yes a DRV_LOG sneaked in one of the patches, didn't notice it, > > sorry about > > that. Nobody noticed either when I sent the backports to stable@d > > pdk.org > > last week for review. > > It's a trivial fix though, so I'd much rather fix it than redo the > > whole lot, see > > the diff at the bottom. >=20 > OK, if you prefer this way than ping me when you push the fix. So I > can rebase and re-send the series.=C2=A0 I've just pushed it. Thanks! --=20 Kind regards, Luca Boccassi