From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14DA0A034E for ; Wed, 27 May 2020 15:04:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D923B1D957; Wed, 27 May 2020 15:04:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BED161D635; Wed, 27 May 2020 15:04:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB0E1347; Wed, 27 May 2020 09:04:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 27 May 2020 09:04:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= snPjKDl1T2uNp3Ap61f3Q/x94SpVFqXqhyAqUHCkn/s=; b=PX8QY47RBglksJ/0 VLh8bHSzmhvDWxiQHNfrlHuJ1+WQNamU94vMtKxRFE7dMMsDxTGJM3Hi16WgNkKc xwzXdpz4GbT+o03mKkkj7dbmfuoUFqhEwDAvPN+ISowjzvB/kgbB8ThUiy/MM0GI NA8CKRPxFwH8hZFPESBIBiNu3YBhei8G2OShT4mp81ORol0aLxp1jQmnptQ+E2LE r69zelg28FJkNrsN1BhOiBbofK4qZ/zyEVHvzCW4DSFAiaA4zsE5+mr3usIUTtO0 WTzSAFv3LRBhrad9UdsmDlGrywYnm5Zwu++PvWKejMeROHTlbxL0W6BbrdfJuiFt vgyivg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=snPjKDl1T2uNp3Ap61f3Q/x94SpVFqXqhyAqUHCkn /s=; b=mFZnUU0UIrhm5JiUrKs/6498WqAWmQMnZYw1drQ1S/PtbjrNaEGsWdrlA P8O38KILgHNJh+4nQ2QIZ2ynMyTael0nZ9WO21c/mLPErC7Y5VbLzcV1D1JMWTRz rhX1aT5ANxG1r0KhpymKb+uZ3XpFgKvs9HEaUexzB8UPXJTx21cH2IL+sTGrgHqr 5q0uRbqRNhaRFadb8yv+oi5wi6Bw2dzHqpTTaGnBmcpzwfYg0uSIE6NegRQxolTw cjMBMDp3yvzWHu7k5doPNOFVb2dENmwjdOZgg6q1uOUZf4A2uGBL66snOlwpHXy8 FAvnxfAl3rizkY70E0capeMruDmsA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedruddvgedgheegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl ohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A33553061CCB; Wed, 27 May 2020 09:04:05 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Harman Kalra Cc: stephen@networkplumber.org, jgrajcia@cisco.com, david.marchand@redhat.com, dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 15:04:04 +0200 Message-ID: <1609476.kT2rm9d7Co@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20200527124425.GA23064@outlook.office365.com> References: <1589204585-13328-1-git-send-email-hkalra@marvell.com> <20200527123251.GA20326@outlook.office365.com> <20200527124425.GA23064@outlook.office365.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [PATCH] eal: fix epoll fd list rebuild X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" 27/05/2020 14:44, Harman Kalra: > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 06:02:53PM +0530, Harman Kalra wrote: > > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 03:19:08PM +0530, Harman Kalra wrote: > > > On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 05:30:26PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > This patch is missing 20.05 because no review was done. > > > > In general, we are missing a maintainer on "interrupts" area. > > > > Ping. > > > > > Hi Thomas, > > > > > > If everybody is fine we can take up the responsibility of maintaining > > > interrupt subsystem. I can send a patch to update maintainer list for > > > the same. > > Sorry for wrong placement of ping in my last mail, as it is bit > confusing if it was for the patch. > > Rather intention of this ping is to get input if we can take up the > maintainership of interrupt subsystem to help the community with the > reviews. Please Cc everybody who contributed to this code. Thanks