From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
"Li, Xiaoyun" <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>,
"Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Cc: Luc Pelletier <lucp.at.work@gmail.com>,
dev@dpdk.org, "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
ferruh.yigit@intel.com, olivier.matz@6wind.com,
stephen@networkplumber.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] eal: fix unaligned loads/stores in rte_memcpy_generic
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 17:53:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1851702.taCxCBeP46@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR11MB44913826A818C4AAF6831B749A299@DM6PR11MB4491.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
04/02/2022 18:16, Ananyev, Konstantin:
>
> > Calls to rte_memcpy_generic could result in unaligned loads/stores for
> > 1 < n < 16. This is undefined behavior according to the C standard,
> > and it gets flagged by the clang undefined behavior sanitizer.
> >
> > rte_memcpy_generic is called with unaligned src and dst addresses.
> > When 1 < n < 16, the code would cast both src and dst to a qword,
> > dword or word pointer, without verifying the alignment of src/dst. The
> > code was changed to use a packed structure to perform the unaligned
> > load/store operations. This results in unaligned load/store operations
> > to be C standards-compliant.
>
> Still not sure we need to fix that:
> This is x86 specific code-path, and as I remember on x86 there are no
> penalties for unaligned access to 2/4/8 byte values.
> Though I like introduction of rte_mov15_or_less() function -t helps
> with code dedup.
Any more opinions?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-08 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-15 19:41 [PATCH] " Luc Pelletier
2022-01-15 21:39 ` [PATCH v2] " Luc Pelletier
2022-01-15 22:13 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-01-16 14:09 ` Luc Pelletier
2022-01-16 16:32 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-01-16 14:13 ` [PATCH v3] " Luc Pelletier
2022-01-16 14:33 ` Luc Pelletier
2022-01-16 16:34 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-01-16 17:59 ` Morten Brørup
2022-01-16 20:33 ` [PATCH v4] " Luc Pelletier
2022-01-17 15:37 ` [PATCH v5] " Luc Pelletier
2022-02-04 16:42 ` Luc Pelletier
2022-02-04 17:16 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2022-02-08 16:53 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2022-02-09 15:05 ` Luc Pelletier
2022-02-10 14:04 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2022-02-10 16:56 ` Luc Pelletier
2022-02-11 15:51 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2022-02-13 22:31 ` Luc Pelletier
2022-02-14 13:41 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2022-02-25 15:51 ` [PATCH v6] eal: fix rte_memcpy strict aliasing/alignment bugs Luc Pelletier
2022-02-25 16:38 ` [PATCH v7] " Luc Pelletier
2022-03-10 14:55 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2022-04-07 15:24 ` David Marchand
2022-04-07 15:32 ` David Marchand
2022-04-07 15:40 ` David Marchand
2022-05-13 19:15 ` Luc Pelletier
2022-05-19 16:41 ` David Marchand
2022-04-08 13:47 ` Luc Pelletier
2022-05-19 16:47 ` David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1851702.taCxCBeP46@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=lucp.at.work@gmail.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=xiaoyun.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).