From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>,
Marko Kovacevic <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>,
Ori Kam <orika@mellanox.com>,
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>,
Radu Nicolau <radu.nicolau@intel.com>,
Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>,
Tomasz Kantecki <tomasz.kantecki@intel.com>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/l3fwd: fix em mode datapath selection
Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 01:32:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1860264.T1sj13Lf8p@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190410072836.17496-1-pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
10/04/2019 09:29, Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula:
> From: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
>
> Currently, l3wfd em mode has two datapath modes em_sequential and
> em_hlm. We can select either of them by defining NO_HASH_MULTI_LOOKUP to
> one or zero.
> The code checks if NO_HASH_MULTI_LOOKUP is defined or not instead of
> checking for the value.
>
> Fixes: 52c97adc1f0f ("examples/l3fwd: fix exact match performance")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
> ---
> --- a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c
> +++ b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c
> #if defined RTE_ARCH_X86 || defined RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_NEON
> -#if defined(NO_HASH_MULTI_LOOKUP)
> +#if NO_HASH_MULTI_LOOKUP
It does not compile:
examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c:302:5: error:
'NO_HASH_MULTI_LOOKUP' is not defined, evaluates to 0 [-Werror,-Wundef]
#if NO_HASH_MULTI_LOOKUP
Anyway such compilation option should be just removed.
Please replace it with a runtime option and/or make it documented.
Thanks
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-02 23:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-10 7:29 Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2019-04-22 21:20 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-23 2:47 ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2019-04-23 8:35 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-23 9:12 ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2019-04-24 2:59 ` Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-05-02 23:32 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1860264.T1sj13Lf8p@xps \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=marko.kovacevic@intel.com \
--cc=orika@mellanox.com \
--cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
--cc=pbhagavatula@marvell.com \
--cc=radu.nicolau@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=tomasz.kantecki@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).