From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 674B61B69F; Wed, 9 May 2018 21:08:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD676211CD; Wed, 9 May 2018 15:08:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 09 May 2018 15:08:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=pnP8kE0L4uUI49dRKi1cfymHDo 8TBlKDK6dyVb1+xB0=; b=AFuaBpJdOFgPx7EJ2tXkXqgb44hYRAY+/gkEAz28Lu +y1DnCQV03EZ45N3jhLjy/8lRJep0SzCzLHpVjflTOPsFSzQXZCGl6G64tFC8D+A 0GoDgrLl0PWo5aSN7dV4Qte04iYsxD2Mwf3JAM18Y8IzFmSABSSPRtXU0XJYNiHp c= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=pnP8kE 0L4uUI49dRKi1cfymHDo8TBlKDK6dyVb1+xB0=; b=R0K14aTjsJqr2T+5Dczn1j L8ukuMXdnYo9WQaKgD3iXXvM/INTOOVRriHpyyZE9m+QUTWin48MjP1IzDC5xWKR yt5lRaVP/ZxjM5yJXSejeQOFcUwCDPJGQyIa2ISybiECHP1ivD1rywwe8peR0wf4 TBKLE67MALG4SlCBrNVKb4UAb8sBy0MQ10TZSc7tE6v6fnkyWb2FGVeiADxRO9fJ gQO52zlflxtk78hQG6wJeTT5Xs2DD9NhyJvjum3AFjqdt5C4CnIx4I6QM4HuFUHj EfniGn272jkbRSU6pfbQzEpWmBIEgX0aef1xyt/+lR4osVR/+s/edEkJdijw/h4w == X-ME-Sender: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 054B0E4B94; Wed, 9 May 2018 15:08:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org, Matan Azrad Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 21:08:21 +0200 Message-ID: <1864854.i0eoOuio3f@xps> In-Reply-To: References: <20180509094337.26112-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <20180509094337.26112-9-thomas@monjalon.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 08/11] ethdev: fix port visibility before initialization X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 19:08:25 -0000 09/05/2018 20:03, Ferruh Yigit: > On 5/9/2018 10:43 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > The port was set to the state ATTACHED during allocation. > > The consequence was to iterate over ports which are not initialized. > > > > The state ATTACHED is now set as the last step of probing. > > > > The uniqueness of port name is now checked before the availability > > of a port id for allocation (order reversed). > > > > As the state is not set on allocation anymore, it is also not checked > > in the function telling whether a port is allocated or not. > > The name of the port is set on allocation, so it is enough as a check. > > > > Fixes: 5588909af21b ("ethdev: add device iterator") > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon > > Signed-off-by: Matan Azrad > > --- > > @@ -3387,6 +3385,8 @@ rte_eth_dev_probing_finish(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) > > { > > if (dev == NULL) > > return; > > + > > + dev->state = RTE_ETH_DEV_ATTACHED; > > Aren't ethdev allocation and probe in different levels? Why not make ethdev > allocation self sufficient but tie it to the device probe() ? Ethdev allocation is self sufficient. Probing is done by the PMD with these steps: 1/ allocate ethdev port 2/ initialize device 3/ notify NEW event and set ethdev status