patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Dekel Peled <dekelp@nvidia.com>
Cc: viacheslavo@nvidia.com, shahafs@nvidia.com, matan@nvidia.com,
	dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix flow check hairpin split
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 22:21:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1981304.3GL16s52rr@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <670e2f1c1644f8722b707d5f4d69eb460868317e.1609682638.git.dekelp@nvidia.com>

03/01/2021 16:18, Dekel Peled:
> Previously, the identification of hairpin queue was done using
> mlx5_rxq_get_type() function.
> Recent patch replaced it with use of mlx5_rxq_get_hairpin_conf(),
> and check of the return value conf != NULL.
> The case of return value is NULL (queue is not hairpin) was not handled.
> As result, non-hairpin flows were wrongly handled.
> This patch adds the required check for return value is NULL.
> 
> Fixes: 509f8470de55 ("net/mlx5: do not split hairpin flow in explicit mode")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dekel Peled <dekelp@nvidia.com>
> Acked-by: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>
> ---
> -			if (conf != NULL && !!conf->tx_explicit)
> +			if (!conf || !!conf->tx_explicit)

The DPDK coding style recommends explicit comparison.
Here it would be:
	if (conf == NULL || conf->tx_explicit != 0)




  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-06 21:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-03 15:18 [dpdk-stable] " Dekel Peled
2021-01-06 21:21 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2021-01-10 17:32 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] " Dekel Peled
2021-01-10 17:37   ` Dekel Peled
2021-01-11 23:28   ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1981304.3GL16s52rr@thomas \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=dekelp@nvidia.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=matan@nvidia.com \
    --cc=shahafs@nvidia.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).