From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2DC32BAD for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 15:40:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Sep 2016 06:40:17 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.30,399,1470726000"; d="scan'208";a="13792548" Received: from yliu-dev.sh.intel.com (HELO yliu-dev) ([10.239.67.162]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Sep 2016 06:40:16 -0700 Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 21:40:47 +0800 From: Yuanhan Liu To: Christian Ehrhardt Cc: stable@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20160926134047.GI20278@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> References: <20160926120949.GC20278@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] Stable Tree coming to life X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 13:40:18 -0000 On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 03:27:41PM +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Yuanhan Liu > wrote: > > Following is something you want to know? (the "About releases" section) > >     http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-September/046189.html > >   > Thanks that was what I was looking for! Good to know. > [...] > > > Last, it'd also be great if distributions like canonical could do some > tests. > The validation team here, for sure, can't cover all cases; otherwise, there > would be no reason for stable release. > > ... > > And (likely one week) before each stable release, I will send the applied > patch > list out, for asking more reviews as well as tests. After that, I will make > a release. > > > Sure, I'd try to pass it through some tests as hopefully others will do as > well. > 1 week prior to release is a bit short maybe, if that could be two that would > be great. Granted :) -- well, if others have no objection. --yliu > I don't mind the list being not 100% complete at that time, it is more about > realizing > "o yeah there is coming something I might need to prep the testbed and allocate > some time" > > > > -- > Christian Ehrhardt > Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server > Canonical Ltd