patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] net/virtio: fix queue notify
@ 2017-04-11 10:44 Xiao Wang
  2017-04-12 21:39 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Stephen Hemminger
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Xiao Wang @ 2017-04-11 10:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: yuanhan.liu; +Cc: dev, Xiao Wang, stable

According to spec, we should write virtqueue index into the notify
address, rather than 1. Besides, some HW backend may rely on the data
written to identify which queue need to serve.

Fixes: 6ba1f63b5ab0 ("virtio: support specification 1.0")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Xiao Wang <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.c b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.c
index ce9a9d3..b767c03 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.c
@@ -504,7 +504,7 @@
 static void
 modern_notify_queue(struct virtio_hw *hw __rte_unused, struct virtqueue *vq)
 {
-	rte_write16(1, vq->notify_addr);
+	rte_write16(vq->vq_queue_index, vq->notify_addr);
 }
 
 const struct virtio_pci_ops modern_ops = {
-- 
1.8.3.1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/virtio: fix queue notify
  2017-04-11 10:44 [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] net/virtio: fix queue notify Xiao Wang
@ 2017-04-12 21:39 ` Stephen Hemminger
  2017-04-13  1:39   ` Yuanhan Liu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2017-04-12 21:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Xiao Wang; +Cc: yuanhan.liu, dev, stable

On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 03:44:28 -0700
Xiao Wang <xiao.w.wang@intel.com> wrote:

> According to spec, we should write virtqueue index into the notify
> address, rather than 1. Besides, some HW backend may rely on the data
> written to identify which queue need to serve.
> 
> Fixes: 6ba1f63b5ab0 ("virtio: support specification 1.0")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Wang <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.c b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.c
> index ce9a9d3..b767c03 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.c
> @@ -504,7 +504,7 @@
>  static void
>  modern_notify_queue(struct virtio_hw *hw __rte_unused, struct virtqueue *vq)
>  {
> -	rte_write16(1, vq->notify_addr);
> +	rte_write16(vq->vq_queue_index, vq->notify_addr);
>  }


Yes, this looks correct. It is what Linux and FreeBSD drivers do.

Reviewed-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/virtio: fix queue notify
  2017-04-12 21:39 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Stephen Hemminger
@ 2017-04-13  1:39   ` Yuanhan Liu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Yuanhan Liu @ 2017-04-13  1:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Hemminger; +Cc: Xiao Wang, dev, stable

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 02:39:25PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 03:44:28 -0700
> Xiao Wang <xiao.w.wang@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > According to spec, we should write virtqueue index into the notify
> > address, rather than 1. Besides, some HW backend may rely on the data
> > written to identify which queue need to serve.
> > 
> > Fixes: 6ba1f63b5ab0 ("virtio: support specification 1.0")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Xiao Wang <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.c b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.c
> > index ce9a9d3..b767c03 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.c
> > @@ -504,7 +504,7 @@
> >  static void
> >  modern_notify_queue(struct virtio_hw *hw __rte_unused, struct virtqueue *vq)
> >  {
> > -	rte_write16(1, vq->notify_addr);
> > +	rte_write16(vq->vq_queue_index, vq->notify_addr);
> >  }
> 
> 
> Yes, this looks correct. It is what Linux and FreeBSD drivers do.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>

Applied to dpdk-next-virtio.

Thanks.

	--yliu

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-04-13  1:42 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-04-11 10:44 [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] net/virtio: fix queue notify Xiao Wang
2017-04-12 21:39 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Stephen Hemminger
2017-04-13  1:39   ` Yuanhan Liu

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).