From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from proxy.6wind.com (host.76.145.23.62.rev.coltfrance.com [62.23.145.76]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 521D67D3A; Wed, 23 Aug 2017 11:30:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from core.dev.6wind.com (unknown [10.0.0.1]) by proxy.6wind.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01D21C5746; Wed, 23 Aug 2017 11:27:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.16.0.195] (helo=6wind.com) by core.dev.6wind.com with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dkRzW-0002JC-Eu; Wed, 23 Aug 2017 11:30:27 +0200 Received: by 6wind.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 23 Aug 2017 11:30:26 +0200 Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 11:30:26 +0200 From: Olivier MATZ To: Yuanhan Liu Cc: Stephen Hemminger , maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20170823093025.bhjwbygfyz4ifd6r@glumotte.dev.6wind.com> References: <20170707195250.22259-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20170708031222.GA11626@yliu-home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170708031222.GA11626@yliu-home> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] virtio fix false offload claims X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 09:30:35 -0000 Hello, On Sat, Jul 08, 2017 at 11:12:22AM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 12:52:48PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > While doing code for Hyper-V, noticed that the virtio driver was > > confused about receive versus transmit offloads. The virtio > > checksum offload is L4 (TCP/UDP) only, not IPv4. Also, TSO > > and LRO are not the same. > > > > This may break some program that was assuming it was getting offloads > > that it wasn't. > > Applied to dpdk-next-virtio. > > And I think they should be backported to stable releases, thus, > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Thanks. > > --yliu > > > > Stephen Hemminger (2): > > virtio: don't falsely claim to do IP checksum > > virtio: don't claim to support LRO > > > > drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c | 30 +++++------------------------- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) > > > > -- > > 2.11.0 I think these 2 commits break the virtio offload, which can be tested as described in this test plan: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-October/048092.html First, about checksum: the description of rxmode->hw_ip_checksum is: hw_ip_checksum : 1, /**< IP/UDP/TCP checksum offload enable. */ So, while I agree the name is not well chosen, it is valid to set it for virtio to enable L4 checksum. Then about LRO: setting rxmode->enable_lro is a way to tell the host that the guest is ok to receive tso packets. From the guest point of view, it is like enabling lro on a physical driver. Again, it is valid and useful to do this. Before removing these features, it would have been nice to have a quick look at the commits that introduced them. Olivier