From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com (mail-wm0-f65.google.com [74.125.82.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D7341B645 for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 14:26:32 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f65.google.com with SMTP id s66so1874115wmf.2 for ; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 05:26:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=jiTYLHBXaqgDjOLCV7blnfN90HF184FVuNac4Q+HY+E=; b=rTVsOiy0TrCqA3auAnoyrw+DtzAVF7Zu1AE4zMEn0AGXtDXLHS0swSM26YpyZy110/ WNs7z4BvB4Xx4Wxqj3E8FHj4OU6ZSuHgpzhXUbrSwGb3fRM87a5LRVeQiYD2yKOOFD40 4Tqh3qizvbWKMINlBnYoyS8I4qaP8h1K4VhFOWDDk55x/UI8X//N8gKTEgziV/zTiwef 9Vxtf4FYbnpqSOfLdV+p9s/ZXavBtgLz0n4eiXh6lmgzRoK32XML303kDIC755/v5Aq3 a+tjH4Ey5dTnCKZ4sbjC740gmfJvyOqGcF4Nn158LYi6O09lE2wORMYi2uC9cWIFb7EN Evqg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=jiTYLHBXaqgDjOLCV7blnfN90HF184FVuNac4Q+HY+E=; b=dTrhwESMIuZD+rj5+OirQsjb5n0mCNcgMGyK+epCWuWvYw5P85l2bAI0zorivOnR2A dAHWK4VTJDTjCiO8oq5qSruEDpIfkWmE9SIgKtuL5MOePd9kMNVQG5ZJxhQjP5FDho4z cIOaXYnfuY46CeBxR5ZLF6PzGC2yu75urChsBN0TH+U5gidwqr2d11N5t3olpbfTwvZb B85a0pTJcR+nyHNgb5DcFduljuPAn0IiYSlbRN/5/IDwCxxL8ilGBqImeR9YAAQ83uTR Z5+bVn+lDssboDW7ugUFLp8YKqMqzanNKRkQFZfNqNRIjouy0+x7EmZkW7s519eV+6Br x1gA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX4UZ+PmQS3bFml233jGu0Q0XjSHH70YVjXa/KHbqg9i/ax+AQGK lHtjGdym57np+BGispq2zaBVdQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+RYk1I+4yTg66zl8/euzBv9o/nBKFWLr/rcB2q28bMODoiID/Xoa7xcdJhT8kDjFF27fI9VSQ== X-Received: by 10.80.177.182 with SMTP id m51mr655042edd.181.1510233991804; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 05:26:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from 6wind.com (host.78.145.23.62.rev.coltfrance.com. [62.23.145.78]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k51sm6222477ede.42.2017.11.09.05.26.30 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Nov 2017 05:26:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 14:26:19 +0100 From: Adrien Mazarguil To: Shahaf Shuler Cc: nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com, yskoh@mellanox.com, dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20171109132619.GZ24849@6wind.com> References: <20171109131014.61309-1-shahafs@mellanox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171109131014.61309-1-shahafs@mellanox.com> Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix rxq interrupt memory corruption X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 13:26:32 -0000 On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 03:10:14PM +0200, Shahaf Shuler wrote: > intr_vec allocation size was wrong causing a memory corruption. > > Fixes: e1016cb73383 ("net/mlx5: fix Rx interrupts management") > Cc: adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: Shahaf Shuler Indeed, nice catch. Acked-by: Adrien Mazarguil Could you submit the same patch for mlx4 against the following commit? (code is identical) 0a2ae703192c ("net/mlx4: fix Rx interrupts management") Thanks! -- Adrien Mazarguil 6WIND