From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f195.google.com (mail-wr0-f195.google.com [209.85.128.195]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CEFA1B330 for ; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 15:18:27 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wr0-f195.google.com with SMTP id w50so1699471wrc.11 for ; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 06:18:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=skXi9vhDDcp/tZlJKa6qarDPEPW+K6UpY6QF0NJx2eU=; b=ZdpzVHYpuvbpG+oTM4h2RFtU4GNC63pnUGv+/2zmMhg+JM8TNoLSeMapVcXvqahXXV KWx4c+mOqcRnFhxIyms5HNJYCYUt6Mj5FGk0VCUAENHCiUfUsGJEmUVPVyKj/KOOEl3u leFfCb+AeYbdDAnggkCmfUPCPRFExiDgjob37g/QFT8lbWMemdUrVMxy6tBXMALwNzky kb9I+cGP8Jdr9ruHOoqkhCdDQKzW4inEMc06rJUecl0YvfI98kgJ66yst9sGDIg//hX1 SX6lXFEnfTzFHgrk+9orLmPF68H4Q4H9Yhn1qymd4//tkYyn07qRWAfXEj3CxNGBn5xz phFg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=skXi9vhDDcp/tZlJKa6qarDPEPW+K6UpY6QF0NJx2eU=; b=IOuoE62MeP7qJe7siXnLvlmda/6vvapjJYRGZ24bXtQS2hXJpf72fX+kaucRiF5l+8 KmxTakGylmABWNFxf2S7bDZJWtuHFuKjyBKKygDrEPR0l4SwBj3/+IIKRsFxwdlbACf+ wsGcCChUzuyu1gcPn6hiUyuqlug5ZzTaNBUtO2hGUjp55MimNjMpr5uDo13D4x95qeIg ga4lT7FL4hqAy0urdt2GgWgfuAmKuOL+UrkicwaRbZ+7ckAf8WamXCF0E2bD0tJK4EED mmZvO6PDXFC7Pedazai1Ei/GWzo42vnPH3pI9bIlOriH5PmZvYz1wkb4kJi+aWl6ZN5x r4Mw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxyterhoYrIFJKpiWPY73/uR5FjJ4mxhw8zGC/wbP5NLvOSLwdpwwv cVHBBmpmEi4HvifjieTQ3vSd X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBovVspHGuWvuIhjkr0XOSaQI1SU9w/dX8Vz7X+1vgusXJ1Z8OCwVcK3Jk2jSsGlIVjVFHzwA0A== X-Received: by 10.223.198.198 with SMTP id c6mr7816609wrh.159.1516371506118; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 06:18:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from laranjeiro-vm.dev.6wind.com (host.78.145.23.62.rev.coltfrance.com. [62.23.145.78]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i47sm9485031wrf.26.2018.01.19.06.18.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 19 Jan 2018 06:18:25 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 15:18:14 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?N=E9lio?= Laranjeiro To: Olivier Matz Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Adrien Mazarguil , Yongseok Koh , stable@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20180119141814.x26mnya6icdv7f3d@laranjeiro-vm.dev.6wind.com> References: <20180118130043.31773-1-olivier.matz@6wind.com> <20180118160427.4fokyhq7koux6ga6@laranjeiro-vm.dev.6wind.com> <20180118161308.26ssahokrsu4e2rn@platinum> <20180119083501.osf4rnd4y4lwujwn@laranjeiro-vm.dev.6wind.com> <20180119084314.uvjbhtveuq7wfpj3@platinum> <20180119133045.2skvdjis6yxk3bet@platinum> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20180119133045.2skvdjis6yxk3bet@platinum> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 1/2] net/mlx5: fix return value of start operation X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 14:18:27 -0000 On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 02:30:45PM +0100, Olivier Matz wrote: > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 09:43:14AM +0100, Olivier Matz wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 09:35:01AM +0100, Nélio Laranjeiro wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 05:13:08PM +0100, Olivier Matz wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 05:04:27PM +0100, Nélio Laranjeiro wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 02:00:42PM +0100, Olivier Matz wrote: > > > > > > On error, mlx5_dev_start() does not return a negative value > > > > > > as it is supposed to do. The consequence is that the application > > > > > > (ex: testpmd) does not notice that the port is not started > > > > > > and begins the rxtx on an uninitialized port, which crashes. > > > > > > > > > > > > Fixes: e1016cb73383 ("net/mlx5: fix Rx interrupts management") > > > > > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz > > > > > > --- > > > > > > drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_trigger.c | 4 +++- > > > > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_trigger.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_trigger.c > > > > > > index 1a20967a2..44f702daa 100644 > > > > > > --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_trigger.c > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_trigger.c > > > > > > @@ -166,6 +166,7 @@ mlx5_dev_start(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) > > > > > > ERROR("%p: an error occurred while configuring control flows:" > > > > > > " %s", > > > > > > (void *)priv, strerror(err)); > > > > > > + err = -err; > > > > > > goto error; > > > > > > } > > > > > > err = priv_flow_start(priv, &priv->flows); > > > > > > @@ -173,6 +174,7 @@ mlx5_dev_start(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) > > > > > > ERROR("%p: an error occurred while configuring flows:" > > > > > > " %s", > > > > > > (void *)priv, strerror(err)); > > > > > > + err = -err; > > > > > > goto error; > > > > > > } > > > > > > err = priv_rx_intr_vec_enable(priv); > > > > > > @@ -196,7 +198,7 @@ mlx5_dev_start(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) > > > > > > priv_rxq_stop(priv); > > > > > > priv_flow_delete_drop_queue(priv); > > > > > > priv_unlock(priv); > > > > > > - return -err; > > > > > > + return err; > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > /** > > > > > > > > > > err in the function is handled with positives errno's, adding only those > > > > > two and returning err will make the other positive. > > > > > > > > I tried to check the return value of all functions called by mlx5_dev_start() > > > > (negative or positive). Do you see something wrong? > > > > > > What I mean is priv_flow_start() is returning a positive errno as all > > > other functions priv_*() that's the main reason for the final rteurn -err; > > priv_txq_start(priv); > -> negative on error > priv_rxq_start(priv); > -> negative on error > priv_dev_traffic_enable(priv, dev); > -> positive (+errno) on error > priv_flow_start(priv, &priv->flows); > -> positive (+errno) on error > priv_rx_intr_vec_enable(priv); > -> negative (-1 or -errno) on error Indeed, All this needs to be re-worked to only return negatives values, in the mean time, Acked-by: Nelio Laranjeiro > > > Internally MLX5 driver only works with positives errnos as lot of them > > > are retuning the values from ioctl directly. Only the public ones are > > > returning negatives. > > > > So, what should I modify in this patch for v2? > > Do you agree that there is a bug regarding the return value of mlx5_dev_start()? > > > > It can be reproduced easily by starting testpmd on a dual-socket machine, > > use the core and memory from socket 0, and have the mlx device on socket 1. > > Then start traffic forwarding, it will crash. -- Nélio Laranjeiro 6WIND