* [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 0/2] Vhost & Virtio fixes for -rc4
@ 2018-02-09 14:26 Maxime Coquelin
2018-02-09 14:26 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 1/2] virtio: fix resuming traffic with rx vector path Maxime Coquelin
2018-02-09 14:26 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 2/2] vhost: don't take access_lock on VHOST_USER_RESET_OWNER Maxime Coquelin
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Coquelin @ 2018-02-09 14:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tiwei.bie, yliu, ferruh.yigit, victork
Cc: dev, stable, zhihong.wang, qian.q.xu, lei.a.yao, Maxime Coquelin
This two patches series fixes two regressions met with virtio-user.
The first one is only reproduced when using the Vector path,
the second one may be met whatever the rx function.
Maxime Coquelin (2):
virtio: fix resuming traffic with rx vector path
vhost: don't take access_lock on VHOST_USER_RESET_OWNER
drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_simple.c | 2 +-
drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_simple.h | 2 +-
lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c | 10 +++++-----
4 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
--
2.14.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 1/2] virtio: fix resuming traffic with rx vector path
2018-02-09 14:26 [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 0/2] Vhost & Virtio fixes for -rc4 Maxime Coquelin
@ 2018-02-09 14:26 ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-02-11 8:02 ` Yao, Lei A
2018-02-12 13:18 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Olivier Matz
2018-02-09 14:26 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 2/2] vhost: don't take access_lock on VHOST_USER_RESET_OWNER Maxime Coquelin
1 sibling, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Coquelin @ 2018-02-09 14:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tiwei.bie, yliu, ferruh.yigit, victork
Cc: dev, stable, zhihong.wang, qian.q.xu, lei.a.yao, Maxime Coquelin
This patch fixes traffic resuming issue seen when using
Rx vector path.
Fixes: efc83a1e7fc3 ("net/virtio: fix queue setup consistency")
Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
---
drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_simple.c | 2 +-
drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_simple.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
index 854af399e..505283edd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
#include "virtio_pci.h"
#include "virtqueue.h"
#include "virtio_rxtx.h"
+#include "virtio_rxtx_simple.h"
#ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_VIRTIO_DEBUG_DUMP
#define VIRTIO_DUMP_PACKET(m, len) rte_pktmbuf_dump(stdout, m, len)
@@ -446,25 +447,28 @@ virtio_dev_rx_queue_setup_finish(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t queue_idx)
&rxvq->fake_mbuf;
}
- while (!virtqueue_full(vq)) {
- m = rte_mbuf_raw_alloc(rxvq->mpool);
- if (m == NULL)
- break;
+ if (hw->use_simple_rx) {
+ while (vq->vq_free_cnt >= RTE_VIRTIO_VPMD_RX_REARM_THRESH) {
+ virtio_rxq_rearm_vec(rxvq);
+ nbufs += RTE_VIRTIO_VPMD_RX_REARM_THRESH;
+ }
+ } else {
+ while (!virtqueue_full(vq)) {
+ m = rte_mbuf_raw_alloc(rxvq->mpool);
+ if (m == NULL)
+ break;
- /* Enqueue allocated buffers */
- if (hw->use_simple_rx)
- error = virtqueue_enqueue_recv_refill_simple(vq, m);
- else
+ /* Enqueue allocated buffers */
error = virtqueue_enqueue_recv_refill(vq, m);
-
- if (error) {
- rte_pktmbuf_free(m);
- break;
+ if (error) {
+ rte_pktmbuf_free(m);
+ break;
+ }
+ nbufs++;
}
- nbufs++;
- }
- vq_update_avail_idx(vq);
+ vq_update_avail_idx(vq);
+ }
PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "Allocated %d bufs", nbufs);
diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_simple.c b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_simple.c
index 7247a0822..0a79d1d5b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_simple.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_simple.c
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ virtio_xmit_pkts_simple(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts,
rte_compiler_barrier();
if (nb_used >= VIRTIO_TX_FREE_THRESH)
- virtio_xmit_cleanup(vq);
+ virtio_xmit_cleanup_simple(vq);
nb_commit = nb_pkts = RTE_MIN((vq->vq_free_cnt >> 1), nb_pkts);
desc_idx = (uint16_t)(vq->vq_avail_idx & desc_idx_max);
diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_simple.h b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_simple.h
index 2d8e6b14a..303904d64 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_simple.h
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_simple.h
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ virtio_rxq_rearm_vec(struct virtnet_rx *rxvq)
#define VIRTIO_TX_FREE_NR 32
/* TODO: vq->tx_free_cnt could mean num of free slots so we could avoid shift */
static inline void
-virtio_xmit_cleanup(struct virtqueue *vq)
+virtio_xmit_cleanup_simple(struct virtqueue *vq)
{
uint16_t i, desc_idx;
uint32_t nb_free = 0;
--
2.14.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 2/2] vhost: don't take access_lock on VHOST_USER_RESET_OWNER
2018-02-09 14:26 [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 0/2] Vhost & Virtio fixes for -rc4 Maxime Coquelin
2018-02-09 14:26 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 1/2] virtio: fix resuming traffic with rx vector path Maxime Coquelin
@ 2018-02-09 14:26 ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-02-12 9:40 ` Tiwei Bie
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Coquelin @ 2018-02-09 14:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tiwei.bie, yliu, ferruh.yigit, victork
Cc: dev, stable, zhihong.wang, qian.q.xu, lei.a.yao, Maxime Coquelin
A deadlock happens when handling VHOST_USER_RESET_OWNER request
for the same reason the lock is not taken for
VHOST_USER_GET_VRING_BASE.
It is safe not to take the lock, as the queues are no more used
by the application when the virtqueues and the device are reset.
Fixes: a3688046995f ("vhost: protect active rings from async ring changes")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Cc: Victor Kaplansky <victork@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
---
lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c
index 65ee33919..90ed2112e 100644
--- a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c
+++ b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c
@@ -1348,16 +1348,16 @@ vhost_user_msg_handler(int vid, int fd)
}
/*
- * Note: we don't lock all queues on VHOST_USER_GET_VRING_BASE,
- * since it is sent when virtio stops and device is destroyed.
- * destroy_device waits for queues to be inactive, so it is safe.
- * Otherwise taking the access_lock would cause a dead lock.
+ * Note: we don't lock all queues on VHOST_USER_GET_VRING_BASE
+ * and VHOST_USER_RESET_OWNER, since it is sent when virtio stops
+ * and device is destroyed. destroy_device waits for queues to be
+ * inactive, so it is safe. Otherwise taking the access_lock
+ * would cause a dead lock.
*/
switch (msg.request.master) {
case VHOST_USER_SET_FEATURES:
case VHOST_USER_SET_PROTOCOL_FEATURES:
case VHOST_USER_SET_OWNER:
- case VHOST_USER_RESET_OWNER:
case VHOST_USER_SET_MEM_TABLE:
case VHOST_USER_SET_LOG_BASE:
case VHOST_USER_SET_LOG_FD:
--
2.14.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 1/2] virtio: fix resuming traffic with rx vector path
2018-02-09 14:26 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 1/2] virtio: fix resuming traffic with rx vector path Maxime Coquelin
@ 2018-02-11 8:02 ` Yao, Lei A
2018-02-12 13:18 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Olivier Matz
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Yao, Lei A @ 2018-02-11 8:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Maxime Coquelin, Bie, Tiwei, yliu, Yigit, Ferruh, victork,
Thomas Monjalon
Cc: dev, stable, Wang, Zhihong, Xu, Qian Q
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maxime Coquelin [mailto:maxime.coquelin@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 9, 2018 10:27 PM
> To: Bie, Tiwei <tiwei.bie@intel.com>; yliu@fridaylinux.org; Yigit, Ferruh
> <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; victork@redhat.com
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; stable@dpdk.org; Wang, Zhihong
> <zhihong.wang@intel.com>; Xu, Qian Q <qian.q.xu@intel.com>; Yao, Lei A
> <lei.a.yao@intel.com>; Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] virtio: fix resuming traffic with rx vector path
>
> This patch fixes traffic resuming issue seen when using
> Rx vector path.
>
> Fixes: efc83a1e7fc3 ("net/virtio: fix queue setup consistency")
>
> Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Lei Yao <lei.a.yao@intel.com>
This patch has been tested by regression test suite. It can fix the traffic resume
issue with vector path. No performance drop during PVP test:
Following test are also checked and passed:
Vhost/virtio multi queue
Virtio-user
Virtio-user as exception path
Vhost/virtio reconnect
My server info:
OS: Ubuntu 16.04
Kernel: 4.4.0-110
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v4 @ 2.20GHz
BR
Lei
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_simple.c | 2 +-
> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_simple.h | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
> index 854af399e..505283edd 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
> #include "virtio_pci.h"
> #include "virtqueue.h"
> #include "virtio_rxtx.h"
> +#include "virtio_rxtx_simple.h"
>
> #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_VIRTIO_DEBUG_DUMP
> #define VIRTIO_DUMP_PACKET(m, len) rte_pktmbuf_dump(stdout, m, len)
> @@ -446,25 +447,28 @@ virtio_dev_rx_queue_setup_finish(struct
> rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t queue_idx)
> &rxvq->fake_mbuf;
> }
>
> - while (!virtqueue_full(vq)) {
> - m = rte_mbuf_raw_alloc(rxvq->mpool);
> - if (m == NULL)
> - break;
> + if (hw->use_simple_rx) {
> + while (vq->vq_free_cnt >=
> RTE_VIRTIO_VPMD_RX_REARM_THRESH) {
> + virtio_rxq_rearm_vec(rxvq);
> + nbufs += RTE_VIRTIO_VPMD_RX_REARM_THRESH;
> + }
> + } else {
> + while (!virtqueue_full(vq)) {
> + m = rte_mbuf_raw_alloc(rxvq->mpool);
> + if (m == NULL)
> + break;
>
> - /* Enqueue allocated buffers */
> - if (hw->use_simple_rx)
> - error = virtqueue_enqueue_recv_refill_simple(vq,
> m);
> - else
> + /* Enqueue allocated buffers */
> error = virtqueue_enqueue_recv_refill(vq, m);
> -
> - if (error) {
> - rte_pktmbuf_free(m);
> - break;
> + if (error) {
> + rte_pktmbuf_free(m);
> + break;
> + }
> + nbufs++;
> }
> - nbufs++;
> - }
>
> - vq_update_avail_idx(vq);
> + vq_update_avail_idx(vq);
> + }
>
> PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "Allocated %d bufs", nbufs);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_simple.c
> b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_simple.c
> index 7247a0822..0a79d1d5b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_simple.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_simple.c
> @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ virtio_xmit_pkts_simple(void *tx_queue, struct
> rte_mbuf **tx_pkts,
> rte_compiler_barrier();
>
> if (nb_used >= VIRTIO_TX_FREE_THRESH)
> - virtio_xmit_cleanup(vq);
> + virtio_xmit_cleanup_simple(vq);
>
> nb_commit = nb_pkts = RTE_MIN((vq->vq_free_cnt >> 1), nb_pkts);
> desc_idx = (uint16_t)(vq->vq_avail_idx & desc_idx_max);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_simple.h
> b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_simple.h
> index 2d8e6b14a..303904d64 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_simple.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_simple.h
> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ virtio_rxq_rearm_vec(struct virtnet_rx *rxvq)
> #define VIRTIO_TX_FREE_NR 32
> /* TODO: vq->tx_free_cnt could mean num of free slots so we could avoid
> shift */
> static inline void
> -virtio_xmit_cleanup(struct virtqueue *vq)
> +virtio_xmit_cleanup_simple(struct virtqueue *vq)
> {
> uint16_t i, desc_idx;
> uint32_t nb_free = 0;
> --
> 2.14.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 2/2] vhost: don't take access_lock on VHOST_USER_RESET_OWNER
2018-02-09 14:26 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 2/2] vhost: don't take access_lock on VHOST_USER_RESET_OWNER Maxime Coquelin
@ 2018-02-12 9:40 ` Tiwei Bie
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Tiwei Bie @ 2018-02-12 9:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Maxime Coquelin
Cc: yliu, ferruh.yigit, victork, dev, stable, zhihong.wang,
qian.q.xu, lei.a.yao
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 03:26:54PM +0100, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> A deadlock happens when handling VHOST_USER_RESET_OWNER request
> for the same reason the lock is not taken for
> VHOST_USER_GET_VRING_BASE.
>
> It is safe not to take the lock, as the queues are no more used
> by the application when the virtqueues and the device are reset.
>
> Fixes: a3688046995f ("vhost: protect active rings from async ring changes")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Cc: Victor Kaplansky <victork@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
Thanks for the work!
Best regards,
Tiwei Bie
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] virtio: fix resuming traffic with rx vector path
2018-02-09 14:26 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 1/2] virtio: fix resuming traffic with rx vector path Maxime Coquelin
2018-02-11 8:02 ` Yao, Lei A
@ 2018-02-12 13:18 ` Olivier Matz
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Olivier Matz @ 2018-02-12 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Maxime Coquelin
Cc: tiwei.bie, yliu, ferruh.yigit, victork, dev, stable,
zhihong.wang, qian.q.xu, lei.a.yao
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 03:26:53PM +0100, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> This patch fixes traffic resuming issue seen when using
> Rx vector path.
>
> Fixes: efc83a1e7fc3 ("net/virtio: fix queue setup consistency")
>
> Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Proposed change for a more detailed commit log (thanks Tiwei for
the explanation):
Since commit efc83a1e7fc3 ("net/virtio: fix queue setup consistency"),
when resuming a virtio port, the rx rings are refilled with new mbufs
until they are full (vq->vq_free_cnt == 0). This is done without
ensuring that the descriptor index remains a multiple of
RTE_VIRTIO_VPMD_RX_REARM_THRESH, which is a prerequisite when using the
vector mode. This can cause an out of bound access in the rx ring.
This commit changes the vector refill method from
virtqueue_enqueue_recv_refill_simple() to virtio_rxq_rearm_vec(), which
properly checks that the refill is done by batch of
RTE_VIRTIO_VPMD_RX_REARM_THRESH.
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_simple.c | 2 +-
> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_simple.h | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
> index 854af399e..505283edd 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
> #include "virtio_pci.h"
> #include "virtqueue.h"
> #include "virtio_rxtx.h"
> +#include "virtio_rxtx_simple.h"
>
> #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_VIRTIO_DEBUG_DUMP
> #define VIRTIO_DUMP_PACKET(m, len) rte_pktmbuf_dump(stdout, m, len)
> @@ -446,25 +447,28 @@ virtio_dev_rx_queue_setup_finish(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t queue_idx)
> &rxvq->fake_mbuf;
> }
>
> - while (!virtqueue_full(vq)) {
> - m = rte_mbuf_raw_alloc(rxvq->mpool);
> - if (m == NULL)
> - break;
> + if (hw->use_simple_rx) {
> + while (vq->vq_free_cnt >= RTE_VIRTIO_VPMD_RX_REARM_THRESH) {
> + virtio_rxq_rearm_vec(rxvq);
> + nbufs += RTE_VIRTIO_VPMD_RX_REARM_THRESH;
> + }
> + } else {
> + while (!virtqueue_full(vq)) {
> + m = rte_mbuf_raw_alloc(rxvq->mpool);
> + if (m == NULL)
> + break;
>
> - /* Enqueue allocated buffers */
> - if (hw->use_simple_rx)
> - error = virtqueue_enqueue_recv_refill_simple(vq, m);
> - else
It looks that virtqueue_enqueue_recv_refill_simple() is not used anymore.
We may want to remove it.
It means this patch also fixes the issue related to the patch I've just
submitted [1]. To ease backport process, I think the patch [1] is still
relevant because it fixes an older commit.
[1] http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/35130/
> + /* Enqueue allocated buffers */
> error = virtqueue_enqueue_recv_refill(vq, m);
> -
> - if (error) {
> - rte_pktmbuf_free(m);
> - break;
> + if (error) {
> + rte_pktmbuf_free(m);
> + break;
> + }
> + nbufs++;
> }
> - nbufs++;
> - }
>
> - vq_update_avail_idx(vq);
> + vq_update_avail_idx(vq);
> + }
>
> PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "Allocated %d bufs", nbufs);
>
> virtio_rxq_vec_setup(rxvq);
Another thing seen by Tiwei: virtio_rxq_vec_setup() should be called
before virtio_rxq_rearm_vec() because it initializes the mbuf
initializer.
Thanks,
Olivier
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-02-12 13:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-02-09 14:26 [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 0/2] Vhost & Virtio fixes for -rc4 Maxime Coquelin
2018-02-09 14:26 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 1/2] virtio: fix resuming traffic with rx vector path Maxime Coquelin
2018-02-11 8:02 ` Yao, Lei A
2018-02-12 13:18 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Olivier Matz
2018-02-09 14:26 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 2/2] vhost: don't take access_lock on VHOST_USER_RESET_OWNER Maxime Coquelin
2018-02-12 9:40 ` Tiwei Bie
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).