From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f169.google.com (mail-wr0-f169.google.com [209.85.128.169]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F03A723C for ; Wed, 2 May 2018 14:17:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wr0-f169.google.com with SMTP id p18-v6so13793405wrm.1 for ; Wed, 02 May 2018 05:17:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=crbBARRGW1iv5LOYnKkbk4sVum1t9WqZLoacpJWp9bM=; b=ZO1puSZAa8wAXDssrUi0lq+/K+3lA6HRBzUmhXNOMFWQKlOp/Yc3nQwCjds2UWkWRn q6Yb+5ukzwA7pk5PeZ9x26ceLa1G+oIXN6QU4YeAOqj63wgStMQV1Zm+wMVwwaS6eXWA 7RHkkhIC+5uuvCMMmX7gL6t5lLfZJYXT2eCoEbl1kCU58kdIJDi4GJSX75kB7fb1R9SJ CpANXVt5Y1rnw9Mo/3Iy80dzB809McR0u4ot2uL6+OOoQq9zCJrE4dfVOL/BqLK40mB2 dFwANOd0+4AqRJXV69uWEedTS4R9QKUZpJfgdEYD/2nh+tX0mlNQj7AtCnNd5ei7AbRF Utag== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=crbBARRGW1iv5LOYnKkbk4sVum1t9WqZLoacpJWp9bM=; b=Z+/3EMjesunR3ta/j/qXU8tsGdJObwtT5EqwMII+KQIWgeJPfZr6H3p+9pfKKHAF3x F4IL7p7vzOCYInLGH1/MIOtKGmHx4iEUI8KhQXxVJRhDHrzIU4Lehkb4VZFVRHWcSUuR zDeBesF5Q9KiryIvEb4EOpHsPxB0uJbJNAVpDh9AH6W/T6mXRATkqFgqsAQ0p6ODojJb Lx9IDq9s+sYPgVDP5BWzgRFbXMVjOMY6+UTZNgnI3Hzl1NwUOJcf7DgG23FBj/NuNzIb 5kwXoYwdr9rMfBbTytapKmheUR8CEHF0fpDxMKqD/crJPcuoOcWsYFOelo3usSyTMtJD KQfg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tBvb2rLTEp6YHZJSVmfFKABchoNpocAHSC3qVOb8YSriPgxuJTw kPur+IruUtN44XDijiGiH4Qn6A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZophKJYFBK30izERUau0zan+miPWCmbpvj4sYexDBcO9wMXl0LhvfGe9e/ZvJ4ZADoyvIUk6A== X-Received: by 2002:adf:8e82:: with SMTP id q2-v6mr15694718wrb.53.1525263420426; Wed, 02 May 2018 05:17:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bidouze.vm.6wind.com (host.78.145.23.62.rev.coltfrance.com. [62.23.145.78]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d83sm10384352wmh.16.2018.05.02.05.16.59 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 02 May 2018 05:16:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 14:16:45 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ga=EBtan?= Rivet To: Luca Boccassi Cc: dpdk stable Message-ID: <20180502121645.cwdamjgmgwsfw5tw@bidouze.vm.6wind.com> References: <20180430144223.18657-85-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> <20180430145402.23057-1-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> <20180430145402.23057-2-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> <20180502082602.bqg4ctdkyyaom6g2@bidouze.vm.6wind.com> <1525258673.23337.40.camel@debian.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1525258673.23337.40.camel@debian.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] patch 'bus/vdev: fix find device implementation' has been queued to stable release 18.02.2 X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 May 2018 12:17:01 -0000 On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 11:57:53AM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > On Wed, 2018-05-02 at 10:26 +0200, Gaëtan Rivet wrote: > > Hi Luca, > > > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 03:53:21PM +0100, luca.boccassi@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > FYI, your patch has been queued to stable release 18.02.2 > > > > > > Note it hasn't been pushed to http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable > > > yet. > > > It will be pushed if I get no objections before 05/02/18. So please > > > shout if anyone has objections. > > > > This patch will be bogus while still compiling in a stable release, > > without the commit: 35f462839b69 ("bus/vdev: add lock on device > > list"). > > > > It should be slightly reworked to function without. The previous > > version > > of this patch [1] could be used instead. > > > > [1]: https://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-April/098822.html > > > > Regards, > > Do you think it's worth including or can I skip it? > It is an actual bug with a simple fix, so I think it's worth including yes. -- Gaëtan Rivet 6WIND