From: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
To: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, mst@redhat.com, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] vhost: improve dirty pages logging performance
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 16:08:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180516080858.GA15144@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <465b4530-f19e-66e0-fc32-437595a3819e@redhat.com>
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 09:49:45AM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> On 05/16/2018 08:21 AM, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 07:30:21PM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
[...]
> > > @@ -309,7 +322,15 @@ struct virtio_net {
> > > static __rte_always_inline void
> > > vhost_set_bit(unsigned int nr, volatile uint8_t *addr)
> > > {
> > > +#if defined(RTE_TOOLCHAIN_GCC) && (GCC_VERSION < 70100)
> >
> > Just curious, is there any reference about why
> > this version was chosen? Thanks!
>
> I googled Michael reference to the LWN article [0], and they mention GCC
> 7.1.
>
> I haven't checked by myself though whether generated code is different in
> GCC >= 7.1.
>
> [0]: https://lwn.net/Articles/691128/
Thanks for the link!
> >
> > > + /*
> > > + * __sync_ built-ins are deprecated, but __atomic_ ones
> > > + * are sub-optimized in older GCC versions.
> > > + */
> >
> > The indent isn't right (just need one tab here).
> Right, will fix.
>
> >
> > > __sync_fetch_and_or_8(addr, (1U << nr));
>
> This is unrelated to this patch set, but from GCC doc [1], shouldn't
> we use __sync_fetch_and_or_1 as the size is in bytes?
>
> [1]: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/_005f_005fsync-Builtins.html
You are right. I didn't notice it.. Please also fix this.
>
> > > +#else
> > > + __atomic_fetch_or(addr, (1U << nr), __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
[...]
> > > @@ -106,6 +106,8 @@ flush_shadow_used_ring(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
> > > rte_smp_wmb();
> > > + vhost_log_cache_sync(dev, vq);
> >
> > Each time we call vhost_log_cache_sync(), there
> > is already a rte_smp_wmb() which is to protect
> > the used->idx update. So maybe there is no need
> > to call rte_smp_wmb() in vhost_log_cache_sync().
>
> Right, I can remove it in vhost_log_cache_sync(), and
> maybe add a comment there stating that a write barrier
> before calling the function is expected.
Good idea.
Best regards,
Tiwei Bie
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-16 8:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-15 17:30 Maxime Coquelin
2018-05-16 6:21 ` Tiwei Bie
2018-05-16 7:49 ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-05-16 8:08 ` Tiwei Bie [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180516080858.GA15144@debian \
--to=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).