From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-f68.google.com (mail-wm1-f68.google.com [209.85.128.68]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 606BA4CA6 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 17:04:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm1-f68.google.com with SMTP id q8-v6so7391233wmq.4 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 08:04:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=++gUUWGZ9jmHHtmsGPA93Ez1c+sgVSFgHgOnbAzbNB8=; b=XRg5R+xGQiVNzZdItLBmDSvywXuLnOVdtsrs6BBBLyOwn4kBBX+iBAwx704nKjaT8o 7+6DWal7yuB0/Fe/+urKXSnTgzhF1fxPQRWTa2WOU6V+u7rtTi986htUr40UqWSZrd3+ sqGezwwJxHnXGm/R3dK4VauBqSZocjahUjU0zYA+0wJzLfWkm9OP7V0BQe0K7s2qxd6n fSjJiBrZDP7im1nK+NifoHv2kSmNqnnLIGiMa2+ig67a1XbK1dKY4J0DSRFE/8+G/JoP Oq0oL+5ygeqFfC3cYT5NuGoBSbhs6LD23h1KD5oSvC26DRSFuENlG6b98FdZC3WEOPj8 UPFg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=++gUUWGZ9jmHHtmsGPA93Ez1c+sgVSFgHgOnbAzbNB8=; b=CjJPuwPgMD34yN/k5IXgEVRBOx8sGveO4hLGgibq9LnGjSf9kQeAL9HTCTV8OzaN92 ZU1WOkL6QN+gbytocOgktlkb3RtH7WY6uUC3lA6NJ8W/Tsk1TxfzRGHC2eBAddjBhWeh ZW1m7KCOvVhL5T5XETWPyUqlCL+AqvNsOFLwK6YvoE/MedwV5Bu/ShOXuKhguSkoUr2S f62DUdXkSDw6V5Da00y6yuzvG48mMj1Y957xJfDR7+PYcvKxAnEUgKYJnPLamZitYWJ+ okeJEta+kFzsO3QzHxmZ6v+l3V5NoOtkzi6sCzjvJm2w0fzxm9rw2CvY+VIPJw3TtMy3 nc/w== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51Ar7AsMlBSoeAAC2ZqMdMm9DxkhU8QoRdGZ4dBSvkJCCMIf+phW NbCMT8pmv6/68dVT6nMecQemCffEf4yYLg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdbKD91OrPM26n5/g98dQuqkfajyEVpvSdGuH5fJz1tYIcvIudZi/n4PBVHoSBF4jxGRW2Mubg== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c18a:: with SMTP id y10-v6mr21902939wmi.87.1537369491121; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 08:04:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pala.dev.6wind.com (host.78.145.23.62.rev.coltfrance.com. [62.23.145.78]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z21-v6sm3572751wmi.29.2018.09.19.08.04.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 19 Sep 2018 08:04:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Didier Pallard To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: stable@dpdk.org Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 17:04:06 +0200 Message-Id: <20180919150409.22880-2-didier.pallard@6wind.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.11.0 In-Reply-To: <20180919150409.22880-1-didier.pallard@6wind.com> References: <20180919150409.22880-1-didier.pallard@6wind.com> Subject: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 1/4] net/e1000: fix missing Tx multi segs capability X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 15:04:51 -0000 In former API, ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NOMULTSEGS was merely a hint indicating that application will never send multisegmented packets, allowing pmd to choose different tx methods accordingly. In new API, DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MULTI_SEGS became an offload capability that is advertised by pmds, some of them do not advertise it and expect to never receive fragmented packets (octeontx, axgbe) So an ethdev that supports multisegmented packets should properly advertise it. Fixes: e5c05e6590ea ("net/e1000: convert to new Tx offloads API") Cc: stable@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: Didier Pallard --- drivers/net/e1000/em_rxtx.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/em_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/e1000/em_rxtx.c index 1103a1839058..087e68304cc8 100644 --- a/drivers/net/e1000/em_rxtx.c +++ b/drivers/net/e1000/em_rxtx.c @@ -1160,6 +1160,7 @@ em_get_tx_port_offloads_capa(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) RTE_SET_USED(dev); tx_offload_capa = + DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MULTI_SEGS | DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_INSERT | DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM | DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM | -- 2.11.0