patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Hajkowski <marcinx.hajkowski@intel.com>
Cc: david.hunt@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] power: fix non thread-safe power env modification
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 08:01:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190318080150.62154337@shemminger-XPS-13-9360> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190318115647.14784-1-marcinx.hajkowski@intel.com>

On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 12:56:44 +0100
Hajkowski <marcinx.hajkowski@intel.com> wrote:

> From: Marcin Hajkowski <marcinx.hajkowski@intel.com>
> 
> Due to lack of thread safety in exisiting solution
> use spinlock mechanism for atomic
> modification of power environment related data.
> 
> Fixes: 445c6528b5 ("power: common interface for guest and host")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marcin Hajkowski <marcinx.hajkowski@intel.com>

Thanks for making this library better.

When I did the dpdk-metrics investigation at the US DPDK summit, the power
library was one of the DPDK libraries that no upstream open source project
uses.

You might want to consider:
  * why is no project using it? what is wrong?
  * does it not fit any use case in any project should it continue?
  * if it is for a non-open source customer, then why is it part of DPDK?


  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-18 15:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-18 11:56 [dpdk-stable] " Hajkowski
2019-03-18 15:01 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2019-03-19 10:57 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Burakov, Anatoly
2019-03-29 14:14 ` [dpdk-stable] " Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-29 15:09   ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Burakov, Anatoly
2019-04-05 14:35 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] " Hajkowski
2019-04-22 20:22   ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190318080150.62154337@shemminger-XPS-13-9360 \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=david.hunt@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=marcinx.hajkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).