From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1332A0096 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 18:44:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1E641B131; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 18:44:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A509C1B105 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 18:44:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 118A33086225; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 16:44:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rh.redhat.com (ovpn-117-94.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.94]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35BDC5D961; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 16:44:29 +0000 (UTC) From: Kevin Traynor To: Rami Rosen Cc: dpdk stable Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 17:43:16 +0100 Message-Id: <20190410164411.10546-8-ktraynor@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20190410164411.10546-1-ktraynor@redhat.com> References: <20190410164411.10546-1-ktraynor@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.42]); Wed, 10 Apr 2019 16:44:30 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [dpdk-stable] patch 'mbuf: fix a typo' has been queued to LTS release 18.11.2 X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" Hi, FYI, your patch has been queued to LTS release 18.11.2 Note it hasn't been pushed to http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable yet. It will be pushed if I get no objections before 04/16/19. So please shout if anyone has objections. Also note that after the patch there's a diff of the upstream commit vs the patch applied to the branch. This will indicate if there was any rebasing needed to apply to the stable branch. If there were code changes for rebasing (ie: not only metadata diffs), please double check that the rebase was correctly done. Thanks. Kevin Traynor --- >From 41b3eb26eef1c27dc5e58b095a0a4179ad7d6204 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rami Rosen Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 20:52:18 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] mbuf: fix a typo [ upstream commit b13baac8d5ffb6b0b7a6ca0def884d3f1a82babb ] This trivial patch fixes a typo in rte_mbuf.h. Fixes: f20b50b946da ("mbuf: optimize refcnt update") Signed-off-by: Rami Rosen --- lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h index 3dbc6695e..795015c81 100644 --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h @@ -914,5 +914,5 @@ rte_mbuf_refcnt_update(struct rte_mbuf *m, int16_t value) /* * The atomic_add is an expensive operation, so we don't want to - * call it in the case where we know we are the uniq holder of + * call it in the case where we know we are the unique holder of * this mbuf (i.e. ref_cnt == 1). Otherwise, an atomic * operation has to be used because concurrent accesses on the -- 2.20.1 --- Diff of the applied patch vs upstream commit (please double-check if non-empty: --- --- - 2019-04-10 14:06:08.637115534 +0100 +++ 0008-mbuf-fix-a-typo.patch 2019-04-10 14:06:07.776296258 +0100 @@ -1,12 +1,13 @@ -From b13baac8d5ffb6b0b7a6ca0def884d3f1a82babb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From 41b3eb26eef1c27dc5e58b095a0a4179ad7d6204 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rami Rosen Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 20:52:18 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] mbuf: fix a typo +[ upstream commit b13baac8d5ffb6b0b7a6ca0def884d3f1a82babb ] + This trivial patch fixes a typo in rte_mbuf.h. Fixes: f20b50b946da ("mbuf: optimize refcnt update") -Cc: stable@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: Rami Rosen --- @@ -14,10 +15,10 @@ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h -index a7f67023a..d961ccaf6 100644 +index 3dbc6695e..795015c81 100644 --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h -@@ -974,5 +974,5 @@ rte_mbuf_refcnt_update(struct rte_mbuf *m, int16_t value) +@@ -914,5 +914,5 @@ rte_mbuf_refcnt_update(struct rte_mbuf *m, int16_t value) /* * The atomic_add is an expensive operation, so we don't want to - * call it in the case where we know we are the uniq holder of