From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C594A046B for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 03:01:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 441EA1B998; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 03:01:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mellanox.co.il (mail-il-dmz.mellanox.com [193.47.165.129]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 981A41B998 for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 03:01:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Internal Mail-Server by MTLPINE2 (envelope-from yskoh@mellanox.com) with ESMTPS (AES256-SHA encrypted); 23 Jul 2019 04:01:31 +0300 Received: from scfae-sc-2.mti.labs.mlnx (scfae-sc-2.mti.labs.mlnx [10.101.0.96]) by labmailer.mlnx (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id x6N11Hes026580; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 04:01:29 +0300 From: Yongseok Koh To: Rami Rosen Cc: dpdk stable Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 17:59:35 -0700 Message-Id: <20190723010115.6446-8-yskoh@mellanox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20190723010115.6446-1-yskoh@mellanox.com> References: <20190723010115.6446-1-yskoh@mellanox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: [dpdk-stable] patch 'mbuf: fix a typo' has been queued to LTS release 17.11.7 X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" Hi, FYI, your patch has been queued to LTS release 17.11.7 Note it hasn't been pushed to http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable yet. It will be pushed if I get no objection by 07/27/19. So please shout if anyone has objection. Also note that after the patch there's a diff of the upstream commit vs the patch applied to the branch. This will indicate if there was any rebasing needed to apply to the stable branch. If there were code changes for rebasing (ie: not only metadata diffs), please double check that the rebase was correctly done. Thanks. Yongseok --- >From 0cf8f9ef40eaeba6d4f2a89e1af3d7b7a612e41e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rami Rosen Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 20:52:18 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] mbuf: fix a typo [ upstream commit b13baac8d5ffb6b0b7a6ca0def884d3f1a82babb ] This trivial patch fixes a typo in rte_mbuf.h. Fixes: f20b50b946da ("mbuf: optimize refcnt update") Signed-off-by: Rami Rosen --- lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h index e6fd86f292..5ed541890f 100644 --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h @@ -783,7 +783,7 @@ rte_mbuf_refcnt_update(struct rte_mbuf *m, int16_t value) { /* * The atomic_add is an expensive operation, so we don't want to - * call it in the case where we know we are the uniq holder of + * call it in the case where we know we are the unique holder of * this mbuf (i.e. ref_cnt == 1). Otherwise, an atomic * operation has to be used because concurrent accesses on the * reference counter can occur. -- 2.21.0 --- Diff of the applied patch vs upstream commit (please double-check if non-empty: --- --- - 2019-07-22 17:55:06.959183166 -0700 +++ 0008-mbuf-fix-a-typo.patch 2019-07-22 17:55:05.767469000 -0700 @@ -1,12 +1,13 @@ -From b13baac8d5ffb6b0b7a6ca0def884d3f1a82babb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From 0cf8f9ef40eaeba6d4f2a89e1af3d7b7a612e41e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rami Rosen Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 20:52:18 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] mbuf: fix a typo +[ upstream commit b13baac8d5ffb6b0b7a6ca0def884d3f1a82babb ] + This trivial patch fixes a typo in rte_mbuf.h. Fixes: f20b50b946da ("mbuf: optimize refcnt update") -Cc: stable@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: Rami Rosen --- @@ -14,10 +15,10 @@ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h -index a7f67023ad..d961ccaf65 100644 +index e6fd86f292..5ed541890f 100644 --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h -@@ -973,7 +973,7 @@ rte_mbuf_refcnt_update(struct rte_mbuf *m, int16_t value) +@@ -783,7 +783,7 @@ rte_mbuf_refcnt_update(struct rte_mbuf *m, int16_t value) { /* * The atomic_add is an expensive operation, so we don't want to