* [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 1/3] net/af_xdp: fix umem frame size & headroom calculations
[not found] <20200210114009.49590-1-ciara.loftus@intel.com>
@ 2020-02-10 11:40 ` Ciara Loftus
2020-02-13 2:45 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Ye Xiaolong
2020-02-10 11:40 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 2/3] net/af_xdp: use correct fill queue addresses Ciara Loftus
2020-02-10 11:40 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 3/3] net/af_xdp: fix maximum MTU value Ciara Loftus
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ciara Loftus @ 2020-02-10 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: Ciara Loftus, stable
The previous frame size calculation incorrectly used
mb_pool->private_data_size and didn't include mb_pool->header_size.
Instead of performing a manual calculation, use the
rte_mempool_calc_obj_size API to determine the frame size.
The previous frame headroom calculation also incorrectly used
mb_pool->private_data_size and didn't include mb_pool->header_size or the
mbuf priv size. Fix this.
Fixes: d8a210774e1d ("net/af_xdp: support unaligned umem chunks")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Ciara Loftus <ciara.loftus@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c | 13 ++++++++-----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c b/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c
index 683e2a559..8b189119c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
#include <rte_log.h>
#include <rte_memory.h>
#include <rte_memzone.h>
+#include <rte_mempool.h>
#include <rte_mbuf.h>
#include <rte_malloc.h>
#include <rte_ring.h>
@@ -755,11 +756,13 @@ xsk_umem_info *xdp_umem_configure(struct pmd_internals *internals __rte_unused,
void *base_addr = NULL;
struct rte_mempool *mb_pool = rxq->mb_pool;
- usr_config.frame_size = rte_pktmbuf_data_room_size(mb_pool) +
- ETH_AF_XDP_MBUF_OVERHEAD +
- mb_pool->private_data_size;
- usr_config.frame_headroom = ETH_AF_XDP_DATA_HEADROOM +
- mb_pool->private_data_size;
+ usr_config.frame_size = rte_mempool_calc_obj_size(mb_pool->elt_size,
+ mb_pool->flags,
+ NULL);
+ usr_config.frame_headroom = mb_pool->header_size +
+ sizeof(struct rte_mbuf) +
+ rte_pktmbuf_priv_size(mb_pool) +
+ RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM;
umem = rte_zmalloc_socket("umem", sizeof(*umem), 0, rte_socket_id());
if (umem == NULL) {
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] net/af_xdp: fix umem frame size & headroom calculations
2020-02-10 11:40 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 1/3] net/af_xdp: fix umem frame size & headroom calculations Ciara Loftus
@ 2020-02-13 2:45 ` Ye Xiaolong
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ye Xiaolong @ 2020-02-13 2:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ciara Loftus; +Cc: dev, stable
On 02/10, Ciara Loftus wrote:
>The previous frame size calculation incorrectly used
>mb_pool->private_data_size and didn't include mb_pool->header_size.
>Instead of performing a manual calculation, use the
>rte_mempool_calc_obj_size API to determine the frame size.
>
>The previous frame headroom calculation also incorrectly used
>mb_pool->private_data_size and didn't include mb_pool->header_size or the
>mbuf priv size. Fix this.
>
>Fixes: d8a210774e1d ("net/af_xdp: support unaligned umem chunks")
>Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
>Signed-off-by: Ciara Loftus <ciara.loftus@intel.com>
>---
> drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c | 13 ++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c b/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c
>index 683e2a559..8b189119c 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c
>@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
> #include <rte_log.h>
> #include <rte_memory.h>
> #include <rte_memzone.h>
>+#include <rte_mempool.h>
> #include <rte_mbuf.h>
> #include <rte_malloc.h>
> #include <rte_ring.h>
>@@ -755,11 +756,13 @@ xsk_umem_info *xdp_umem_configure(struct pmd_internals *internals __rte_unused,
> void *base_addr = NULL;
> struct rte_mempool *mb_pool = rxq->mb_pool;
>
>- usr_config.frame_size = rte_pktmbuf_data_room_size(mb_pool) +
>- ETH_AF_XDP_MBUF_OVERHEAD +
>- mb_pool->private_data_size;
>- usr_config.frame_headroom = ETH_AF_XDP_DATA_HEADROOM +
>- mb_pool->private_data_size;
>+ usr_config.frame_size = rte_mempool_calc_obj_size(mb_pool->elt_size,
>+ mb_pool->flags,
>+ NULL);
>+ usr_config.frame_headroom = mb_pool->header_size +
>+ sizeof(struct rte_mbuf) +
>+ rte_pktmbuf_priv_size(mb_pool) +
>+ RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM;
>
> umem = rte_zmalloc_socket("umem", sizeof(*umem), 0, rte_socket_id());
> if (umem == NULL) {
>--
>2.17.1
>
Reviewed-by: Xiaolong Ye <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 2/3] net/af_xdp: use correct fill queue addresses
[not found] <20200210114009.49590-1-ciara.loftus@intel.com>
2020-02-10 11:40 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 1/3] net/af_xdp: fix umem frame size & headroom calculations Ciara Loftus
@ 2020-02-10 11:40 ` Ciara Loftus
2020-02-13 3:09 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Ye Xiaolong
2020-02-10 11:40 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 3/3] net/af_xdp: fix maximum MTU value Ciara Loftus
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ciara Loftus @ 2020-02-10 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: Ciara Loftus, stable
The fill queue addresses should start at the beginning of the mempool
object instead of the beginning of the mbuf. This is because the umem
frame headroom includes the mp hdrobj size. Starting at this point
ensures AF_XDP doesn't write past the available room in the frame, in
the case of larger packets which are close to the size of the mbuf.
Fixes: d8a210774e1d ("net/af_xdp: support unaligned umem chunks")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Ciara Loftus <ciara.loftus@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c b/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c
index 8b189119c..1e98cd44f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c
@@ -172,7 +172,8 @@ reserve_fill_queue_zc(struct xsk_umem_info *umem, uint16_t reserve_size,
uint64_t addr;
fq_addr = xsk_ring_prod__fill_addr(fq, idx++);
- addr = (uint64_t)bufs[i] - (uint64_t)umem->buffer;
+ addr = (uint64_t)bufs[i] - (uint64_t)umem->buffer -
+ umem->mb_pool->header_size;
*fq_addr = addr;
}
@@ -271,8 +272,11 @@ af_xdp_rx_zc(void *queue, struct rte_mbuf **bufs, uint16_t nb_pkts)
addr = xsk_umem__extract_addr(addr);
bufs[i] = (struct rte_mbuf *)
- xsk_umem__get_data(umem->buffer, addr);
- bufs[i]->data_off = offset - sizeof(struct rte_mbuf);
+ xsk_umem__get_data(umem->buffer, addr +
+ umem->mb_pool->header_size);
+ bufs[i]->data_off = offset - sizeof(struct rte_mbuf) -
+ rte_pktmbuf_priv_size(umem->mb_pool) -
+ umem->mb_pool->header_size;
rte_pktmbuf_pkt_len(bufs[i]) = len;
rte_pktmbuf_data_len(bufs[i]) = len;
@@ -385,7 +389,8 @@ pull_umem_cq(struct xsk_umem_info *umem, int size)
#if defined(XDP_UMEM_UNALIGNED_CHUNK_FLAG)
addr = xsk_umem__extract_addr(addr);
rte_pktmbuf_free((struct rte_mbuf *)
- xsk_umem__get_data(umem->buffer, addr));
+ xsk_umem__get_data(umem->buffer,
+ addr + umem->mb_pool->header_size));
#else
rte_ring_enqueue(umem->buf_ring, (void *)addr);
#endif
@@ -443,9 +448,11 @@ af_xdp_tx_zc(void *queue, struct rte_mbuf **bufs, uint16_t nb_pkts)
}
desc = xsk_ring_prod__tx_desc(&txq->tx, idx_tx);
desc->len = mbuf->pkt_len;
- addr = (uint64_t)mbuf - (uint64_t)umem->buffer;
+ addr = (uint64_t)mbuf - (uint64_t)umem->buffer -
+ umem->mb_pool->header_size;
offset = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(mbuf, uint64_t) -
- (uint64_t)mbuf;
+ (uint64_t)mbuf +
+ umem->mb_pool->header_size;
offset = offset << XSK_UNALIGNED_BUF_OFFSET_SHIFT;
desc->addr = addr | offset;
count++;
@@ -466,9 +473,11 @@ af_xdp_tx_zc(void *queue, struct rte_mbuf **bufs, uint16_t nb_pkts)
desc = xsk_ring_prod__tx_desc(&txq->tx, idx_tx);
desc->len = mbuf->pkt_len;
- addr = (uint64_t)local_mbuf - (uint64_t)umem->buffer;
+ addr = (uint64_t)local_mbuf - (uint64_t)umem->buffer -
+ umem->mb_pool->header_size;
offset = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(local_mbuf, uint64_t) -
- (uint64_t)local_mbuf;
+ (uint64_t)local_mbuf +
+ umem->mb_pool->header_size;
pkt = xsk_umem__get_data(umem->buffer, addr + offset);
offset = offset << XSK_UNALIGNED_BUF_OFFSET_SHIFT;
desc->addr = addr | offset;
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] net/af_xdp: use correct fill queue addresses
2020-02-10 11:40 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 2/3] net/af_xdp: use correct fill queue addresses Ciara Loftus
@ 2020-02-13 3:09 ` Ye Xiaolong
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ye Xiaolong @ 2020-02-13 3:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ciara Loftus; +Cc: dev, stable
On 02/10, Ciara Loftus wrote:
>The fill queue addresses should start at the beginning of the mempool
>object instead of the beginning of the mbuf. This is because the umem
>frame headroom includes the mp hdrobj size. Starting at this point
>ensures AF_XDP doesn't write past the available room in the frame, in
>the case of larger packets which are close to the size of the mbuf.
>
>Fixes: d8a210774e1d ("net/af_xdp: support unaligned umem chunks")
>Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
>Signed-off-by: Ciara Loftus <ciara.loftus@intel.com>
>---
> drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c b/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c
>index 8b189119c..1e98cd44f 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c
>@@ -172,7 +172,8 @@ reserve_fill_queue_zc(struct xsk_umem_info *umem, uint16_t reserve_size,
> uint64_t addr;
>
> fq_addr = xsk_ring_prod__fill_addr(fq, idx++);
>- addr = (uint64_t)bufs[i] - (uint64_t)umem->buffer;
>+ addr = (uint64_t)bufs[i] - (uint64_t)umem->buffer -
>+ umem->mb_pool->header_size;
> *fq_addr = addr;
> }
>
>@@ -271,8 +272,11 @@ af_xdp_rx_zc(void *queue, struct rte_mbuf **bufs, uint16_t nb_pkts)
> addr = xsk_umem__extract_addr(addr);
>
> bufs[i] = (struct rte_mbuf *)
>- xsk_umem__get_data(umem->buffer, addr);
>- bufs[i]->data_off = offset - sizeof(struct rte_mbuf);
>+ xsk_umem__get_data(umem->buffer, addr +
>+ umem->mb_pool->header_size);
>+ bufs[i]->data_off = offset - sizeof(struct rte_mbuf) -
>+ rte_pktmbuf_priv_size(umem->mb_pool) -
>+ umem->mb_pool->header_size;
>
> rte_pktmbuf_pkt_len(bufs[i]) = len;
> rte_pktmbuf_data_len(bufs[i]) = len;
>@@ -385,7 +389,8 @@ pull_umem_cq(struct xsk_umem_info *umem, int size)
> #if defined(XDP_UMEM_UNALIGNED_CHUNK_FLAG)
> addr = xsk_umem__extract_addr(addr);
> rte_pktmbuf_free((struct rte_mbuf *)
>- xsk_umem__get_data(umem->buffer, addr));
>+ xsk_umem__get_data(umem->buffer,
>+ addr + umem->mb_pool->header_size));
> #else
> rte_ring_enqueue(umem->buf_ring, (void *)addr);
> #endif
>@@ -443,9 +448,11 @@ af_xdp_tx_zc(void *queue, struct rte_mbuf **bufs, uint16_t nb_pkts)
> }
> desc = xsk_ring_prod__tx_desc(&txq->tx, idx_tx);
> desc->len = mbuf->pkt_len;
>- addr = (uint64_t)mbuf - (uint64_t)umem->buffer;
>+ addr = (uint64_t)mbuf - (uint64_t)umem->buffer -
>+ umem->mb_pool->header_size;
> offset = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(mbuf, uint64_t) -
>- (uint64_t)mbuf;
>+ (uint64_t)mbuf +
>+ umem->mb_pool->header_size;
> offset = offset << XSK_UNALIGNED_BUF_OFFSET_SHIFT;
> desc->addr = addr | offset;
> count++;
>@@ -466,9 +473,11 @@ af_xdp_tx_zc(void *queue, struct rte_mbuf **bufs, uint16_t nb_pkts)
> desc = xsk_ring_prod__tx_desc(&txq->tx, idx_tx);
> desc->len = mbuf->pkt_len;
>
>- addr = (uint64_t)local_mbuf - (uint64_t)umem->buffer;
>+ addr = (uint64_t)local_mbuf - (uint64_t)umem->buffer -
>+ umem->mb_pool->header_size;
> offset = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(local_mbuf, uint64_t) -
>- (uint64_t)local_mbuf;
>+ (uint64_t)local_mbuf +
>+ umem->mb_pool->header_size;
> pkt = xsk_umem__get_data(umem->buffer, addr + offset);
> offset = offset << XSK_UNALIGNED_BUF_OFFSET_SHIFT;
> desc->addr = addr | offset;
>--
>2.17.1
>
Reviewed-by: Xiaolong Ye <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 3/3] net/af_xdp: fix maximum MTU value
[not found] <20200210114009.49590-1-ciara.loftus@intel.com>
2020-02-10 11:40 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 1/3] net/af_xdp: fix umem frame size & headroom calculations Ciara Loftus
2020-02-10 11:40 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 2/3] net/af_xdp: use correct fill queue addresses Ciara Loftus
@ 2020-02-10 11:40 ` Ciara Loftus
2020-02-13 3:05 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Ye Xiaolong
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ciara Loftus @ 2020-02-10 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: Ciara Loftus, stable
The maximum MTU for af_xdp zero copy is equal to the page size less the
frame overhead introduced by AF_XDP (XDP HR = 256) and DPDK (frame headroom
= 320). The patch updates this value to reflect this.
This change also makes it possible to remove unneeded constants for both
zero-copy and copy mode.
Fixes: d8a210774e1d ("net/af_xdp: support unaligned umem chunks")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Ciara Loftus <ciara.loftus@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c b/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c
index 1e98cd44f..75f037c3e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c
@@ -59,13 +59,6 @@ static int af_xdp_logtype;
#define ETH_AF_XDP_FRAME_SIZE 2048
#define ETH_AF_XDP_NUM_BUFFERS 4096
-#ifdef XDP_UMEM_UNALIGNED_CHUNK_FLAG
-#define ETH_AF_XDP_MBUF_OVERHEAD 128 /* sizeof(struct rte_mbuf) */
-#define ETH_AF_XDP_DATA_HEADROOM \
- (ETH_AF_XDP_MBUF_OVERHEAD + RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM)
-#else
-#define ETH_AF_XDP_DATA_HEADROOM 0
-#endif
#define ETH_AF_XDP_DFLT_NUM_DESCS XSK_RING_CONS__DEFAULT_NUM_DESCS
#define ETH_AF_XDP_DFLT_START_QUEUE_IDX 0
#define ETH_AF_XDP_DFLT_QUEUE_COUNT 1
@@ -602,7 +595,14 @@ eth_dev_info(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct rte_eth_dev_info *dev_info)
dev_info->max_tx_queues = internals->queue_cnt;
dev_info->min_mtu = RTE_ETHER_MIN_MTU;
- dev_info->max_mtu = ETH_AF_XDP_FRAME_SIZE - ETH_AF_XDP_DATA_HEADROOM;
+#if defined(XDP_UMEM_UNALIGNED_CHUNK_FLAG)
+ dev_info->max_mtu = getpagesize() -
+ sizeof(struct rte_mempool_objhdr) -
+ sizeof(struct rte_mbuf) -
+ RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM - XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM;
+#else
+ dev_info->max_mtu = ETH_AF_XDP_FRAME_SIZE;
+#endif
dev_info->default_rxportconf.nb_queues = 1;
dev_info->default_txportconf.nb_queues = 1;
@@ -804,7 +804,7 @@ xsk_umem_info *xdp_umem_configure(struct pmd_internals *internals,
.fill_size = ETH_AF_XDP_DFLT_NUM_DESCS,
.comp_size = ETH_AF_XDP_DFLT_NUM_DESCS,
.frame_size = ETH_AF_XDP_FRAME_SIZE,
- .frame_headroom = ETH_AF_XDP_DATA_HEADROOM };
+ .frame_headroom = 0 };
char ring_name[RTE_RING_NAMESIZE];
char mz_name[RTE_MEMZONE_NAMESIZE];
int ret;
@@ -829,8 +829,7 @@ xsk_umem_info *xdp_umem_configure(struct pmd_internals *internals,
for (i = 0; i < ETH_AF_XDP_NUM_BUFFERS; i++)
rte_ring_enqueue(umem->buf_ring,
- (void *)(i * ETH_AF_XDP_FRAME_SIZE +
- ETH_AF_XDP_DATA_HEADROOM));
+ (void *)(i * ETH_AF_XDP_FRAME_SIZE));
snprintf(mz_name, sizeof(mz_name), "af_xdp_umem_%s_%u",
internals->if_name, rxq->xsk_queue_idx);
@@ -939,7 +938,7 @@ eth_rx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
/* Now get the space available for data in the mbuf */
buf_size = rte_pktmbuf_data_room_size(mb_pool) -
RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM;
- data_size = ETH_AF_XDP_FRAME_SIZE - ETH_AF_XDP_DATA_HEADROOM;
+ data_size = ETH_AF_XDP_FRAME_SIZE;
if (data_size > buf_size) {
AF_XDP_LOG(ERR, "%s: %d bytes will not fit in mbuf (%d bytes)\n",
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] net/af_xdp: fix maximum MTU value
2020-02-10 11:40 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 3/3] net/af_xdp: fix maximum MTU value Ciara Loftus
@ 2020-02-13 3:05 ` Ye Xiaolong
2020-02-13 8:43 ` Loftus, Ciara
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ye Xiaolong @ 2020-02-13 3:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ciara Loftus; +Cc: dev, stable
On 02/10, Ciara Loftus wrote:
>The maximum MTU for af_xdp zero copy is equal to the page size less the
>frame overhead introduced by AF_XDP (XDP HR = 256) and DPDK (frame headroom
>= 320). The patch updates this value to reflect this.
>
>This change also makes it possible to remove unneeded constants for both
>zero-copy and copy mode.
>
>Fixes: d8a210774e1d ("net/af_xdp: support unaligned umem chunks")
>Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
>Signed-off-by: Ciara Loftus <ciara.loftus@intel.com>
>---
> drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c b/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c
>index 1e98cd44f..75f037c3e 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c
>@@ -59,13 +59,6 @@ static int af_xdp_logtype;
>
> #define ETH_AF_XDP_FRAME_SIZE 2048
> #define ETH_AF_XDP_NUM_BUFFERS 4096
>-#ifdef XDP_UMEM_UNALIGNED_CHUNK_FLAG
>-#define ETH_AF_XDP_MBUF_OVERHEAD 128 /* sizeof(struct rte_mbuf) */
>-#define ETH_AF_XDP_DATA_HEADROOM \
>- (ETH_AF_XDP_MBUF_OVERHEAD + RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM)
>-#else
>-#define ETH_AF_XDP_DATA_HEADROOM 0
>-#endif
> #define ETH_AF_XDP_DFLT_NUM_DESCS XSK_RING_CONS__DEFAULT_NUM_DESCS
> #define ETH_AF_XDP_DFLT_START_QUEUE_IDX 0
> #define ETH_AF_XDP_DFLT_QUEUE_COUNT 1
>@@ -602,7 +595,14 @@ eth_dev_info(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct rte_eth_dev_info *dev_info)
> dev_info->max_tx_queues = internals->queue_cnt;
>
> dev_info->min_mtu = RTE_ETHER_MIN_MTU;
>- dev_info->max_mtu = ETH_AF_XDP_FRAME_SIZE - ETH_AF_XDP_DATA_HEADROOM;
>+#if defined(XDP_UMEM_UNALIGNED_CHUNK_FLAG)
>+ dev_info->max_mtu = getpagesize() -
>+ sizeof(struct rte_mempool_objhdr) -
>+ sizeof(struct rte_mbuf) -
>+ RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM - XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM;
>+#else
>+ dev_info->max_mtu = ETH_AF_XDP_FRAME_SIZE;
Do we need to subtract XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM for copy mode as well?
Thanks,
Xiaolong
>+#endif
>
> dev_info->default_rxportconf.nb_queues = 1;
> dev_info->default_txportconf.nb_queues = 1;
>@@ -804,7 +804,7 @@ xsk_umem_info *xdp_umem_configure(struct pmd_internals *internals,
> .fill_size = ETH_AF_XDP_DFLT_NUM_DESCS,
> .comp_size = ETH_AF_XDP_DFLT_NUM_DESCS,
> .frame_size = ETH_AF_XDP_FRAME_SIZE,
>- .frame_headroom = ETH_AF_XDP_DATA_HEADROOM };
>+ .frame_headroom = 0 };
> char ring_name[RTE_RING_NAMESIZE];
> char mz_name[RTE_MEMZONE_NAMESIZE];
> int ret;
>@@ -829,8 +829,7 @@ xsk_umem_info *xdp_umem_configure(struct pmd_internals *internals,
>
> for (i = 0; i < ETH_AF_XDP_NUM_BUFFERS; i++)
> rte_ring_enqueue(umem->buf_ring,
>- (void *)(i * ETH_AF_XDP_FRAME_SIZE +
>- ETH_AF_XDP_DATA_HEADROOM));
>+ (void *)(i * ETH_AF_XDP_FRAME_SIZE));
>
> snprintf(mz_name, sizeof(mz_name), "af_xdp_umem_%s_%u",
> internals->if_name, rxq->xsk_queue_idx);
>@@ -939,7 +938,7 @@ eth_rx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> /* Now get the space available for data in the mbuf */
> buf_size = rte_pktmbuf_data_room_size(mb_pool) -
> RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM;
>- data_size = ETH_AF_XDP_FRAME_SIZE - ETH_AF_XDP_DATA_HEADROOM;
>+ data_size = ETH_AF_XDP_FRAME_SIZE;
>
> if (data_size > buf_size) {
> AF_XDP_LOG(ERR, "%s: %d bytes will not fit in mbuf (%d bytes)\n",
>--
>2.17.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] net/af_xdp: fix maximum MTU value
2020-02-13 3:05 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Ye Xiaolong
@ 2020-02-13 8:43 ` Loftus, Ciara
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Loftus, Ciara @ 2020-02-13 8:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ye, Xiaolong; +Cc: dev, stable
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] net/af_xdp: fix maximum MTU value
>
> On 02/10, Ciara Loftus wrote:
> >The maximum MTU for af_xdp zero copy is equal to the page size less the
> >frame overhead introduced by AF_XDP (XDP HR = 256) and DPDK (frame
> headroom
> >= 320). The patch updates this value to reflect this.
> >
> >This change also makes it possible to remove unneeded constants for both
> >zero-copy and copy mode.
> >
> >Fixes: d8a210774e1d ("net/af_xdp: support unaligned umem chunks")
> >Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Ciara Loftus <ciara.loftus@intel.com>
> >---
> > drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c
> b/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c
> >index 1e98cd44f..75f037c3e 100644
> >--- a/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c
> >+++ b/drivers/net/af_xdp/rte_eth_af_xdp.c
> >@@ -59,13 +59,6 @@ static int af_xdp_logtype;
> >
> > #define ETH_AF_XDP_FRAME_SIZE 2048
> > #define ETH_AF_XDP_NUM_BUFFERS 4096
> >-#ifdef XDP_UMEM_UNALIGNED_CHUNK_FLAG
> >-#define ETH_AF_XDP_MBUF_OVERHEAD 128 /* sizeof(struct
> rte_mbuf) */
> >-#define ETH_AF_XDP_DATA_HEADROOM \
> >- (ETH_AF_XDP_MBUF_OVERHEAD + RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM)
> >-#else
> >-#define ETH_AF_XDP_DATA_HEADROOM 0
> >-#endif
> > #define ETH_AF_XDP_DFLT_NUM_DESCS
> XSK_RING_CONS__DEFAULT_NUM_DESCS
> > #define ETH_AF_XDP_DFLT_START_QUEUE_IDX 0
> > #define ETH_AF_XDP_DFLT_QUEUE_COUNT 1
> >@@ -602,7 +595,14 @@ eth_dev_info(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct
> rte_eth_dev_info *dev_info)
> > dev_info->max_tx_queues = internals->queue_cnt;
> >
> > dev_info->min_mtu = RTE_ETHER_MIN_MTU;
> >- dev_info->max_mtu = ETH_AF_XDP_FRAME_SIZE -
> ETH_AF_XDP_DATA_HEADROOM;
> >+#if defined(XDP_UMEM_UNALIGNED_CHUNK_FLAG)
> >+ dev_info->max_mtu = getpagesize() -
> >+ sizeof(struct rte_mempool_objhdr) -
> >+ sizeof(struct rte_mbuf) -
> >+ RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM -
> XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM;
> >+#else
> >+ dev_info->max_mtu = ETH_AF_XDP_FRAME_SIZE;
>
> Do we need to subtract XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM for copy mode as well?
Good catch. I'll add this and spin a v4.
Thanks for the reviews.
Ciara
>
> Thanks,
> Xiaolong
>
> >+#endif
> >
> > dev_info->default_rxportconf.nb_queues = 1;
> > dev_info->default_txportconf.nb_queues = 1;
> >@@ -804,7 +804,7 @@ xsk_umem_info *xdp_umem_configure(struct
> pmd_internals *internals,
> > .fill_size = ETH_AF_XDP_DFLT_NUM_DESCS,
> > .comp_size = ETH_AF_XDP_DFLT_NUM_DESCS,
> > .frame_size = ETH_AF_XDP_FRAME_SIZE,
> >- .frame_headroom = ETH_AF_XDP_DATA_HEADROOM };
> >+ .frame_headroom = 0 };
> > char ring_name[RTE_RING_NAMESIZE];
> > char mz_name[RTE_MEMZONE_NAMESIZE];
> > int ret;
> >@@ -829,8 +829,7 @@ xsk_umem_info *xdp_umem_configure(struct
> pmd_internals *internals,
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < ETH_AF_XDP_NUM_BUFFERS; i++)
> > rte_ring_enqueue(umem->buf_ring,
> >- (void *)(i * ETH_AF_XDP_FRAME_SIZE +
> >- ETH_AF_XDP_DATA_HEADROOM));
> >+ (void *)(i * ETH_AF_XDP_FRAME_SIZE));
> >
> > snprintf(mz_name, sizeof(mz_name), "af_xdp_umem_%s_%u",
> > internals->if_name, rxq->xsk_queue_idx);
> >@@ -939,7 +938,7 @@ eth_rx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> > /* Now get the space available for data in the mbuf */
> > buf_size = rte_pktmbuf_data_room_size(mb_pool) -
> > RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM;
> >- data_size = ETH_AF_XDP_FRAME_SIZE -
> ETH_AF_XDP_DATA_HEADROOM;
> >+ data_size = ETH_AF_XDP_FRAME_SIZE;
> >
> > if (data_size > buf_size) {
> > AF_XDP_LOG(ERR, "%s: %d bytes will not fit in mbuf (%d
> bytes)\n",
> >--
> >2.17.1
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread