* Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] net/i40e: fix FDIR issue for ETH + VLAN pattern
2020-10-23 8:15 [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] net/i40e: fix FDIR issue for ETH + VLAN pattern beilei.xing
@ 2020-10-23 7:07 ` Guo, Jia
2020-10-27 6:21 ` beilei.xing
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Guo, Jia @ 2020-10-23 7:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xing, Beilei, dev; +Cc: stable
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, October 23, 2020 4:15 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Guo, Jia <jia.guo@intel.com>; Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>;
> stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH] net/i40e: fix FDIR issue for ETH + VLAN pattern
>
> From: Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>
>
> Currently, can't create more than one following flow for ETH + VLAN pattern:
>
> > flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / vlan vid is 350 / end
> actions queue index 2 / end
>
> The root cause is the keys of all such flows are the same.
>
Create more same flow or different flow? Why the same key relate with below code change.
Suggest better to make it more clear for readable. Thanks.
> Fixes: 42044b69c67d ("net/i40e: support input set selection for FDIR")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c
> index adc5da1c53..60043322a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,9 @@
> #define I40E_IPV6_FRAG_HEADER 44
> #define I40E_TENANT_ARRAY_NUM 3
> #define I40E_TCI_MASK 0xFFFF
> +#define I40E_PRI_MASK 0xE000
> +#define I40E_CFI_MASK 0x1000
> +#define I40E_VID_MASK 0x0FFF
>
Should below are better to show that tci involve the others when use these mask?
+#define I40E_TCI_PRI_MASK 0xE000
+#define I40E_TCI_CFI_MASK 0x1000
+#define I40E_TCI_VID_MASK 0x0FFF
> static int i40e_flow_validate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> const struct rte_flow_attr *attr, @@ -2705,12
> +2708,22 @@ i40e_flow_parse_fdir_pattern(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>
> RTE_ASSERT(!(input_set &
> I40E_INSET_LAST_ETHER_TYPE));
> if (vlan_spec && vlan_mask) {
> - if (vlan_mask->tci ==
> - rte_cpu_to_be_16(I40E_TCI_MASK)) {
> - input_set |=
> I40E_INSET_VLAN_INNER;
> - filter->input.flow_ext.vlan_tci =
> - vlan_spec->tci;
> + if (vlan_mask->tci !=
> + rte_cpu_to_be_16(I40E_TCI_MASK) &&
> + vlan_mask->tci !=
> + rte_cpu_to_be_16(I40E_PRI_MASK) &&
> + vlan_mask->tci !=
> + rte_cpu_to_be_16(I40E_CFI_MASK) &&
> + vlan_mask->tci !=
> + rte_cpu_to_be_16(I40E_VID_MASK)) {
> + rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
> +
> RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
> + item,
> + "Unsupported TCI mask.");
> }
> + input_set |= I40E_INSET_VLAN_INNER;
> + filter->input.flow_ext.vlan_tci =
> + vlan_spec->tci;
> }
> if (vlan_spec && vlan_mask && vlan_mask-
> >inner_type) {
> if (vlan_mask->inner_type !=
> RTE_BE16(0xffff)) {
> --
> 2.26.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] net/i40e: fix FDIR issue for ETH + VLAN pattern
@ 2020-10-23 8:15 beilei.xing
2020-10-23 7:07 ` Guo, Jia
2020-10-27 6:21 ` beilei.xing
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: beilei.xing @ 2020-10-23 8:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: jia.guo, Beilei Xing, stable
From: Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>
Currently, can't create more than one following flow for
ETH + VLAN pattern:
> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / vlan vid is 350 / end
actions queue index 2 / end
The root cause is the keys of all such flows are the same.
Fixes: 42044b69c67d ("net/i40e: support input set selection for FDIR")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c
index adc5da1c53..60043322a1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c
+++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c
@@ -28,6 +28,9 @@
#define I40E_IPV6_FRAG_HEADER 44
#define I40E_TENANT_ARRAY_NUM 3
#define I40E_TCI_MASK 0xFFFF
+#define I40E_PRI_MASK 0xE000
+#define I40E_CFI_MASK 0x1000
+#define I40E_VID_MASK 0x0FFF
static int i40e_flow_validate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
@@ -2705,12 +2708,22 @@ i40e_flow_parse_fdir_pattern(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
RTE_ASSERT(!(input_set & I40E_INSET_LAST_ETHER_TYPE));
if (vlan_spec && vlan_mask) {
- if (vlan_mask->tci ==
- rte_cpu_to_be_16(I40E_TCI_MASK)) {
- input_set |= I40E_INSET_VLAN_INNER;
- filter->input.flow_ext.vlan_tci =
- vlan_spec->tci;
+ if (vlan_mask->tci !=
+ rte_cpu_to_be_16(I40E_TCI_MASK) &&
+ vlan_mask->tci !=
+ rte_cpu_to_be_16(I40E_PRI_MASK) &&
+ vlan_mask->tci !=
+ rte_cpu_to_be_16(I40E_CFI_MASK) &&
+ vlan_mask->tci !=
+ rte_cpu_to_be_16(I40E_VID_MASK)) {
+ rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
+ RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
+ item,
+ "Unsupported TCI mask.");
}
+ input_set |= I40E_INSET_VLAN_INNER;
+ filter->input.flow_ext.vlan_tci =
+ vlan_spec->tci;
}
if (vlan_spec && vlan_mask && vlan_mask->inner_type) {
if (vlan_mask->inner_type != RTE_BE16(0xffff)) {
--
2.26.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] net/i40e: fix FDIR issue for ETH + VLAN pattern
2020-10-27 6:21 ` beilei.xing
@ 2020-10-26 7:14 ` Guo, Jia
2020-10-27 0:03 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Zhang, Qi Z
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Guo, Jia @ 2020-10-26 7:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xing, Beilei, dev; +Cc: stable
Acked-by: Jeff Guo <jia.guo@intel.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2020 2:22 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Guo, Jia <jia.guo@intel.com>; Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>;
> stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH] net/i40e: fix FDIR issue for ETH + VLAN pattern
>
> From: Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>
>
> Currently, can't create more than one following flow for ETH + VLAN pattern.
>
> 1. flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / vlan vid is 350 / end
> actions queue index 2 / end
> 2. flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / vlan vid is 351 / end
> actions queue index 3 / end
>
> The root cause is the vlan_tci is not set correctly, it will cause the keys of
> both of the two flows are the same.
>
> Fixes: 42044b69c67d ("net/i40e: support input set selection for FDIR")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c
> index 8e7a9989b3..5bec0c7a84 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c
> @@ -27,7 +27,10 @@
> #define I40E_IPV6_TC_MASK (0xFF << I40E_FDIR_IPv6_TC_OFFSET)
> #define I40E_IPV6_FRAG_HEADER 44
> #define I40E_TENANT_ARRAY_NUM 3
> -#define I40E_TCI_MASK 0xFFFF
> +#define I40E_VLAN_TCI_MASK 0xFFFF
> +#define I40E_VLAN_PRI_MASK 0xE000
> +#define I40E_VLAN_CFI_MASK 0x1000
> +#define I40E_VLAN_VID_MASK 0x0FFF
>
> static int i40e_flow_validate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> const struct rte_flow_attr *attr, @@ -2705,12
> +2708,22 @@ i40e_flow_parse_fdir_pattern(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>
> RTE_ASSERT(!(input_set &
> I40E_INSET_LAST_ETHER_TYPE));
> if (vlan_spec && vlan_mask) {
> - if (vlan_mask->tci ==
> - rte_cpu_to_be_16(I40E_TCI_MASK)) {
> - input_set |=
> I40E_INSET_VLAN_INNER;
> - filter->input.flow_ext.vlan_tci =
> - vlan_spec->tci;
> + if (vlan_mask->tci !=
> + rte_cpu_to_be_16(I40E_VLAN_TCI_MASK)
> &&
> + vlan_mask->tci !=
> + rte_cpu_to_be_16(I40E_VLAN_PRI_MASK)
> &&
> + vlan_mask->tci !=
> + rte_cpu_to_be_16(I40E_VLAN_CFI_MASK)
> &&
> + vlan_mask->tci !=
> +
> rte_cpu_to_be_16(I40E_VLAN_VID_MASK)) {
> + rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
> +
> RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
> + item,
> + "Unsupported TCI mask.");
> }
> + input_set |= I40E_INSET_VLAN_INNER;
> + filter->input.flow_ext.vlan_tci =
> + vlan_spec->tci;
> }
> if (vlan_spec && vlan_mask && vlan_mask-
> >inner_type) {
> if (vlan_mask->inner_type !=
> RTE_BE16(0xffff)) { @@ -3894,10 +3907,10 @@
> i40e_flow_parse_vxlan_pattern(__rte_unused struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>
> if (vlan_spec && vlan_mask) {
> if (vlan_mask->tci ==
> - rte_cpu_to_be_16(I40E_TCI_MASK))
> + rte_cpu_to_be_16(I40E_VLAN_TCI_MASK))
> filter->inner_vlan =
> rte_be_to_cpu_16(vlan_spec->tci)
> &
> - I40E_TCI_MASK;
> + I40E_VLAN_TCI_MASK;
> filter_type |= ETH_TUNNEL_FILTER_IVLAN;
> }
> break;
> @@ -4125,10 +4138,10 @@ i40e_flow_parse_nvgre_pattern(__rte_unused
> struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>
> if (vlan_spec && vlan_mask) {
> if (vlan_mask->tci ==
> - rte_cpu_to_be_16(I40E_TCI_MASK))
> + rte_cpu_to_be_16(I40E_VLAN_TCI_MASK))
> filter->inner_vlan =
> rte_be_to_cpu_16(vlan_spec->tci)
> &
> - I40E_TCI_MASK;
> + I40E_VLAN_TCI_MASK;
> filter_type |= ETH_TUNNEL_FILTER_IVLAN;
> }
> break;
> @@ -4800,7 +4813,7 @@ i40e_flow_parse_rss_pattern(__rte_unused struct
> rte_eth_dev *dev,
> vlan_mask = item->mask;
> if (vlan_spec && vlan_mask) {
> if (vlan_mask->tci ==
> - rte_cpu_to_be_16(I40E_TCI_MASK))
> {
> +
> rte_cpu_to_be_16(I40E_VLAN_TCI_MASK)) {
> info->region[0].user_priority[0] =
> (rte_be_to_cpu_16(
> vlan_spec->tci) >> 13) & 0x7;
> --
> 2.26.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: fix FDIR issue for ETH + VLAN pattern
2020-10-26 7:14 ` Guo, Jia
@ 2020-10-27 0:03 ` Zhang, Qi Z
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Zhang, Qi Z @ 2020-10-27 0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guo, Jia, Xing, Beilei, dev; +Cc: stable
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Guo, Jia
> Sent: Monday, October 26, 2020 3:15 PM
> To: Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: fix FDIR issue for ETH + VLAN pattern
>
> Acked-by: Jeff Guo <jia.guo@intel.com>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2020 2:22 PM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Guo, Jia <jia.guo@intel.com>; Xing, Beilei
> > <beilei.xing@intel.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> > Subject: [PATCH] net/i40e: fix FDIR issue for ETH + VLAN pattern
> >
> > From: Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>
> >
> > Currently, can't create more than one following flow for ETH + VLAN pattern.
> >
> > 1. flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / vlan vid is 350 / end
> > actions queue index 2 / end
> > 2. flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / vlan vid is 351 / end
> > actions queue index 3 / end
> >
> > The root cause is the vlan_tci is not set correctly, it will cause
> > the keys of both of the two flows are the same.
> >
> > Fixes: 42044b69c67d ("net/i40e: support input set selection for FDIR")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>
> > ---
Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel.
Thanks
Qi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] net/i40e: fix FDIR issue for ETH + VLAN pattern
2020-10-23 8:15 [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] net/i40e: fix FDIR issue for ETH + VLAN pattern beilei.xing
2020-10-23 7:07 ` Guo, Jia
@ 2020-10-27 6:21 ` beilei.xing
2020-10-26 7:14 ` Guo, Jia
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: beilei.xing @ 2020-10-27 6:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: jia.guo, Beilei Xing, stable
From: Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>
Currently, can't create more than one following flow for
ETH + VLAN pattern.
1. flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / vlan vid is 350 / end
actions queue index 2 / end
2. flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / vlan vid is 351 / end
actions queue index 3 / end
The root cause is the vlan_tci is not set correctly, it will
cause the keys of both of the two flows are the same.
Fixes: 42044b69c67d ("net/i40e: support input set selection for FDIR")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c
index 8e7a9989b3..5bec0c7a84 100644
--- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c
+++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c
@@ -27,7 +27,10 @@
#define I40E_IPV6_TC_MASK (0xFF << I40E_FDIR_IPv6_TC_OFFSET)
#define I40E_IPV6_FRAG_HEADER 44
#define I40E_TENANT_ARRAY_NUM 3
-#define I40E_TCI_MASK 0xFFFF
+#define I40E_VLAN_TCI_MASK 0xFFFF
+#define I40E_VLAN_PRI_MASK 0xE000
+#define I40E_VLAN_CFI_MASK 0x1000
+#define I40E_VLAN_VID_MASK 0x0FFF
static int i40e_flow_validate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
@@ -2705,12 +2708,22 @@ i40e_flow_parse_fdir_pattern(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
RTE_ASSERT(!(input_set & I40E_INSET_LAST_ETHER_TYPE));
if (vlan_spec && vlan_mask) {
- if (vlan_mask->tci ==
- rte_cpu_to_be_16(I40E_TCI_MASK)) {
- input_set |= I40E_INSET_VLAN_INNER;
- filter->input.flow_ext.vlan_tci =
- vlan_spec->tci;
+ if (vlan_mask->tci !=
+ rte_cpu_to_be_16(I40E_VLAN_TCI_MASK) &&
+ vlan_mask->tci !=
+ rte_cpu_to_be_16(I40E_VLAN_PRI_MASK) &&
+ vlan_mask->tci !=
+ rte_cpu_to_be_16(I40E_VLAN_CFI_MASK) &&
+ vlan_mask->tci !=
+ rte_cpu_to_be_16(I40E_VLAN_VID_MASK)) {
+ rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
+ RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
+ item,
+ "Unsupported TCI mask.");
}
+ input_set |= I40E_INSET_VLAN_INNER;
+ filter->input.flow_ext.vlan_tci =
+ vlan_spec->tci;
}
if (vlan_spec && vlan_mask && vlan_mask->inner_type) {
if (vlan_mask->inner_type != RTE_BE16(0xffff)) {
@@ -3894,10 +3907,10 @@ i40e_flow_parse_vxlan_pattern(__rte_unused struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
if (vlan_spec && vlan_mask) {
if (vlan_mask->tci ==
- rte_cpu_to_be_16(I40E_TCI_MASK))
+ rte_cpu_to_be_16(I40E_VLAN_TCI_MASK))
filter->inner_vlan =
rte_be_to_cpu_16(vlan_spec->tci) &
- I40E_TCI_MASK;
+ I40E_VLAN_TCI_MASK;
filter_type |= ETH_TUNNEL_FILTER_IVLAN;
}
break;
@@ -4125,10 +4138,10 @@ i40e_flow_parse_nvgre_pattern(__rte_unused struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
if (vlan_spec && vlan_mask) {
if (vlan_mask->tci ==
- rte_cpu_to_be_16(I40E_TCI_MASK))
+ rte_cpu_to_be_16(I40E_VLAN_TCI_MASK))
filter->inner_vlan =
rte_be_to_cpu_16(vlan_spec->tci) &
- I40E_TCI_MASK;
+ I40E_VLAN_TCI_MASK;
filter_type |= ETH_TUNNEL_FILTER_IVLAN;
}
break;
@@ -4800,7 +4813,7 @@ i40e_flow_parse_rss_pattern(__rte_unused struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
vlan_mask = item->mask;
if (vlan_spec && vlan_mask) {
if (vlan_mask->tci ==
- rte_cpu_to_be_16(I40E_TCI_MASK)) {
+ rte_cpu_to_be_16(I40E_VLAN_TCI_MASK)) {
info->region[0].user_priority[0] =
(rte_be_to_cpu_16(
vlan_spec->tci) >> 13) & 0x7;
--
2.26.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-10-27 0:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-10-23 8:15 [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] net/i40e: fix FDIR issue for ETH + VLAN pattern beilei.xing
2020-10-23 7:07 ` Guo, Jia
2020-10-27 6:21 ` beilei.xing
2020-10-26 7:14 ` Guo, Jia
2020-10-27 0:03 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Zhang, Qi Z
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).