* [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] mbuf: allow dynamic flags to be used by secondary process
[not found] <20201015172019.3181-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
@ 2020-10-20 20:58 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-10-24 0:43 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3] mbuf: fix dynamic flags lookup from " Stephen Hemminger
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2020-10-20 20:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: stable, Stephen Hemminger, olivier.matz
The dynamic flag management is broken if rte_mbuf_dynflag_lookup()
is done in a secondary process because the local pointer to
the memzone is not ever initialized.
Fix it by using the same checks as dynfield_register().
I.e if shared memory zone has not been looked up already,
then discover it.
Fixes: 4958ca3a443a ("mbuf: support dynamic fields and flags")
Cc: olivier.matz@6wind.com
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---
v2 - move check to inside locked region
lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c | 20 ++++++++------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c
index 538a43f6959f..717898c0df02 100644
--- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c
+++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c
@@ -185,13 +185,11 @@ rte_mbuf_dynfield_lookup(const char *name, struct rte_mbuf_dynfield *params)
{
struct mbuf_dynfield_elt *mbuf_dynfield;
- if (shm == NULL) {
- rte_errno = ENOENT;
- return -1;
- }
-
rte_mcfg_tailq_read_lock();
- mbuf_dynfield = __mbuf_dynfield_lookup(name);
+ if (shm == NULL && init_shared_mem() < 0)
+ mbuf_dynfield = NULL;
+ else
+ mbuf_dynfield = __mbuf_dynfield_lookup(name);
rte_mcfg_tailq_read_unlock();
if (mbuf_dynfield == NULL) {
@@ -384,13 +382,11 @@ rte_mbuf_dynflag_lookup(const char *name,
{
struct mbuf_dynflag_elt *mbuf_dynflag;
- if (shm == NULL) {
- rte_errno = ENOENT;
- return -1;
- }
-
rte_mcfg_tailq_read_lock();
- mbuf_dynflag = __mbuf_dynflag_lookup(name);
+ if (shm == NULL && init_shared_mem() < 0)
+ mbuf_dynflag = NULL;
+ else
+ mbuf_dynflag = __mbuf_dynflag_lookup(name);
rte_mcfg_tailq_read_unlock();
if (mbuf_dynflag == NULL) {
--
2.27.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3] mbuf: fix dynamic flags lookup from secondary process
[not found] <20201015172019.3181-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
2020-10-20 20:58 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] mbuf: allow dynamic flags to be used by secondary process Stephen Hemminger
@ 2020-10-24 0:43 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-10-26 10:39 ` Olivier Matz
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2020-10-24 0:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: stable, Stephen Hemminger, olivier.matz
The dynamic flag management is broken if rte_mbuf_dynflag_lookup()
is done in a secondary process because the local pointer to
the memzone is not ever initialized.
Fix it by using the same checks as dynfield_register().
I.e if shared memory zone has not been looked up already,
then discover it.
Fixes: 4958ca3a443a ("mbuf: support dynamic fields and flags")
Cc: olivier.matz@6wind.com
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---
v3 - change title, fix one extra whitespace
lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c | 20 ++++++++------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c
index 538a43f6959f..554ec5a1ca4f 100644
--- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c
+++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c
@@ -185,13 +185,11 @@ rte_mbuf_dynfield_lookup(const char *name, struct rte_mbuf_dynfield *params)
{
struct mbuf_dynfield_elt *mbuf_dynfield;
- if (shm == NULL) {
- rte_errno = ENOENT;
- return -1;
- }
-
rte_mcfg_tailq_read_lock();
- mbuf_dynfield = __mbuf_dynfield_lookup(name);
+ if (shm == NULL && init_shared_mem() < 0)
+ mbuf_dynfield = NULL;
+ else
+ mbuf_dynfield = __mbuf_dynfield_lookup(name);
rte_mcfg_tailq_read_unlock();
if (mbuf_dynfield == NULL) {
@@ -384,13 +382,11 @@ rte_mbuf_dynflag_lookup(const char *name,
{
struct mbuf_dynflag_elt *mbuf_dynflag;
- if (shm == NULL) {
- rte_errno = ENOENT;
- return -1;
- }
-
rte_mcfg_tailq_read_lock();
- mbuf_dynflag = __mbuf_dynflag_lookup(name);
+ if (shm == NULL && init_shared_mem() < 0)
+ mbuf_dynflag = NULL;
+ else
+ mbuf_dynflag = __mbuf_dynflag_lookup(name);
rte_mcfg_tailq_read_unlock();
if (mbuf_dynflag == NULL) {
--
2.27.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3] mbuf: fix dynamic flags lookup from secondary process
2020-10-24 0:43 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3] mbuf: fix dynamic flags lookup from " Stephen Hemminger
@ 2020-10-26 10:39 ` Olivier Matz
2020-10-26 14:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Olivier Matz @ 2020-10-26 10:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Hemminger; +Cc: dev, stable
Hi Stephen,
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 05:43:31PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> The dynamic flag management is broken if rte_mbuf_dynflag_lookup()
> is done in a secondary process because the local pointer to
> the memzone is not ever initialized.
>
> Fix it by using the same checks as dynfield_register().
> I.e if shared memory zone has not been looked up already,
> then discover it.
>
> Fixes: 4958ca3a443a ("mbuf: support dynamic fields and flags")
> Cc: olivier.matz@6wind.com
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> ---
>
> v3 - change title, fix one extra whitespace
>
> lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c | 20 ++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c
> index 538a43f6959f..554ec5a1ca4f 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c
> @@ -185,13 +185,11 @@ rte_mbuf_dynfield_lookup(const char *name, struct rte_mbuf_dynfield *params)
> {
> struct mbuf_dynfield_elt *mbuf_dynfield;
>
> - if (shm == NULL) {
> - rte_errno = ENOENT;
> - return -1;
> - }
> -
> rte_mcfg_tailq_read_lock();
> - mbuf_dynfield = __mbuf_dynfield_lookup(name);
> + if (shm == NULL && init_shared_mem() < 0)
> + mbuf_dynfield = NULL;
> + else
> + mbuf_dynfield = __mbuf_dynfield_lookup(name);
> rte_mcfg_tailq_read_unlock();
>
> if (mbuf_dynfield == NULL) {
> rte_errno = ENOENT;
> return -1;
There is still a small corner case here: on a primary process,
init_shared_mem() can return -1 in case rte_memzone_reserve_aligned()
returns a NULL memzone. In this situation, rte_errno is set by the
memzone layer by overriden to ENOENT.
Maybe something like this is better, what do you think?
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ __mbuf_dynfield_lookup(const char *name)
break;
}
- if (te == NULL) {
+ if (te == NULL || mbuf_dynfield == NULL) {
rte_errno = ENOENT;
return NULL;
}
@@ -185,19 +185,15 @@ rte_mbuf_dynfield_lookup(const char *name, struct rte_mbuf_dynfield *params)
{
struct mbuf_dynfield_elt *mbuf_dynfield;
- if (shm == NULL) {
- rte_errno = ENOENT;
- return -1;
- }
-
rte_mcfg_tailq_read_lock();
- mbuf_dynfield = __mbuf_dynfield_lookup(name);
+ if (shm == NULL && init_shared_mem() < 0)
+ mbuf_dynfield = NULL;
+ else
+ mbuf_dynfield = __mbuf_dynfield_lookup(name);
rte_mcfg_tailq_read_unlock();
- if (mbuf_dynfield == NULL) {
- rte_errno = ENOENT;
+ if (mbuf_dynfield == NULL)
return -1;
- }
if (params != NULL)
memcpy(params, &mbuf_dynfield->params, sizeof(*params));
Thanks,
Olivier
> @@ -384,13 +382,11 @@ rte_mbuf_dynflag_lookup(const char *name,
> {
> struct mbuf_dynflag_elt *mbuf_dynflag;
>
> - if (shm == NULL) {
> - rte_errno = ENOENT;
> - return -1;
> - }
> -
> rte_mcfg_tailq_read_lock();
> - mbuf_dynflag = __mbuf_dynflag_lookup(name);
> + if (shm == NULL && init_shared_mem() < 0)
> + mbuf_dynflag = NULL;
> + else
> + mbuf_dynflag = __mbuf_dynflag_lookup(name);
> rte_mcfg_tailq_read_unlock();
>
> if (mbuf_dynflag == NULL) {
> --
> 2.27.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3] mbuf: fix dynamic flags lookup from secondary process
2020-10-26 10:39 ` Olivier Matz
@ 2020-10-26 14:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2020-10-26 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Olivier Matz; +Cc: dev, stable
On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:39:35 +0100
Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com> wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 05:43:31PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > The dynamic flag management is broken if rte_mbuf_dynflag_lookup()
> > is done in a secondary process because the local pointer to
> > the memzone is not ever initialized.
> >
> > Fix it by using the same checks as dynfield_register().
> > I.e if shared memory zone has not been looked up already,
> > then discover it.
> >
> > Fixes: 4958ca3a443a ("mbuf: support dynamic fields and flags")
> > Cc: olivier.matz@6wind.com
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> > ---
> >
> > v3 - change title, fix one extra whitespace
> >
> > lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c | 20 ++++++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c
> > index 538a43f6959f..554ec5a1ca4f 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c
> > @@ -185,13 +185,11 @@ rte_mbuf_dynfield_lookup(const char *name, struct rte_mbuf_dynfield *params)
> > {
> > struct mbuf_dynfield_elt *mbuf_dynfield;
> >
> > - if (shm == NULL) {
> > - rte_errno = ENOENT;
> > - return -1;
> > - }
> > -
> > rte_mcfg_tailq_read_lock();
> > - mbuf_dynfield = __mbuf_dynfield_lookup(name);
> > + if (shm == NULL && init_shared_mem() < 0)
> > + mbuf_dynfield = NULL;
> > + else
> > + mbuf_dynfield = __mbuf_dynfield_lookup(name);
> > rte_mcfg_tailq_read_unlock();
> >
> > if (mbuf_dynfield == NULL) {
> > rte_errno = ENOENT;
> > return -1;
>
> There is still a small corner case here: on a primary process,
> init_shared_mem() can return -1 in case rte_memzone_reserve_aligned()
> returns a NULL memzone. In this situation, rte_errno is set by the
> memzone layer by overriden to ENOENT.
>
> Maybe something like this is better, what do you think?
Sure, for what I was using rte_errno was not important. And since it was
previously broken lets get it fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-10-26 14:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20201015172019.3181-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
2020-10-20 20:58 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] mbuf: allow dynamic flags to be used by secondary process Stephen Hemminger
2020-10-24 0:43 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3] mbuf: fix dynamic flags lookup from " Stephen Hemminger
2020-10-26 10:39 ` Olivier Matz
2020-10-26 14:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).