From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26B42A0527 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 19:42:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EC036CA9; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 19:42:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-wr1-f41.google.com (mail-wr1-f41.google.com [209.85.221.41]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D89B6CA9 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 19:42:02 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wr1-f41.google.com with SMTP id s8so2774260wrw.10 for ; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 10:42:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=82yMWxD4zEBZmldnLQeShzAZP1Cv3o59iJj9cvz62/E=; b=kGPxQZeP4yWpSIIu9R9mfhZ3DfIQRAlx25cSDOkqgVW49g8VsTPaLQ9cSTPpyaodbp 3XUq3qT1Ja0A2E9TKkcu0J/bL7FIPdl82O1lYHNalVn/8l/DLiqBWzUG2wB5qU2SRgsu /twenOXik5cLNi2sLGveWuTwgPM6hM6u3pMdBdbrdfqbFt+Com/oe+chzWtAyXhE7eqn goDPogJy27sldfyp9/jvnYKdOIlZEpgTOaRm6ueWK38YpLnZq4dRlU2t0qjAxXbraaz5 WwBuEpInyWdgtsu7Eq0hj1AFv57GqCK5wAwcYIn8T0Kh5WBjz7sImVVDgCZ+ELgROF6o YMWA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=82yMWxD4zEBZmldnLQeShzAZP1Cv3o59iJj9cvz62/E=; b=Ux8huzd3F72nraAluW6BXj0+aZdFN4ZMW6xFlh0b5cJ79BgVulO5yLAH14Nd2au2Pe 0R0JuB4Uk5vyfra3glT0ZNLk6QcsSc27mILPypnZKOXN5mYUSU4cf86c5zaSDDeEbw34 PZPSOm45aQAStVCAXGT2reU83BMEqz6KvemWMvUNPAXEpox/KVJhHIlho5AEkKH3l1xj VTQ8OjbuXTLNX+0Zfvet+f5jc49oPx1ZrU3dr3Vo5xYflnmmcjrjWiZoI6JCf2B27msI hSn4vfjg/Nhw6ejGA7G8dqCzYiZlFGprWPWNUdsd4rWj/KbFR2ugeIJNcx+38AxWbtaA ntwg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533isCHiPgIUTQWqTmTEJFrWQWVT4D0doJSX0poZCeBR6L5flead PA8aAdIjkIXSSN2sc4lONIQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxWZB25laNr/cbotzqFUx0f5i9oEEsYRf3Z0pbIiC3XOerWk0biQiOstHLkD/Up49bQ9sFnog== X-Received: by 2002:adf:cd81:: with SMTP id q1mr20569119wrj.410.1604947321286; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 10:42:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([88.98.246.218]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p10sm14038037wre.2.2020.11.09.10.41.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 09 Nov 2020 10:41:59 -0800 (PST) From: luca.boccassi@gmail.com To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: Andrew Rybchenko , dpdk stable Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 18:40:01 +0000 Message-Id: <20201109184111.3463090-13-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20201109184111.3463090-1-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> References: <20201028104606.3504127-207-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> <20201109184111.3463090-1-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: [dpdk-stable] patch 'mbuf: fix typo in dynamic field convention note' has been queued to stable release 19.11.6 X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" Hi, FYI, your patch has been queued to stable release 19.11.6 Note it hasn't been pushed to http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable yet. It will be pushed if I get no objections before 11/11/20. So please shout if anyone has objections. Also note that after the patch there's a diff of the upstream commit vs the patch applied to the branch. This will indicate if there was any rebasing needed to apply to the stable branch. If there were code changes for rebasing (ie: not only metadata diffs), please double check that the rebase was correctly done. Queued patches are on a temporary branch at: https://github.com/bluca/dpdk-stable This queued commit can be viewed at: https://github.com/bluca/dpdk-stable/commit/fb86d42d93057ad93875173e98fd370bac7e0346 Thanks. Luca Boccassi --- >From fb86d42d93057ad93875173e98fd370bac7e0346 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Monjalon Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2020 21:39:26 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] mbuf: fix typo in dynamic field convention note [ upstream commit 34d26d26b7f92b2b418af513504fead362c91806 ] Replace "in a in PMD" with "in a PMD". Fixes: 4958ca3a443a ("mbuf: support dynamic fields and flags") Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko --- lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.h b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.h index 96c363137e..f9f6dbbac8 100644 --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.h +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.h @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ * conventions than function names in dpdk: * - "rte_mbuf_dynfield_" if defined in mbuf library * - "rte__dynfield_" if defined in another library - * - "rte_net__dynfield_" if defined in a in PMD + * - "rte_net__dynfield_" if defined in a PMD * - any name that does not start with "rte_" in an application */ -- 2.27.0 --- Diff of the applied patch vs upstream commit (please double-check if non-empty: --- --- - 2020-11-09 18:40:11.741391586 +0000 +++ 0013-mbuf-fix-typo-in-dynamic-field-convention-note.patch 2020-11-09 18:40:11.087310598 +0000 @@ -1 +1 @@ -From 34d26d26b7f92b2b418af513504fead362c91806 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From fb86d42d93057ad93875173e98fd370bac7e0346 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 @@ -5,0 +6,2 @@ +[ upstream commit 34d26d26b7f92b2b418af513504fead362c91806 ] + @@ -9 +10,0 @@ -Cc: stable@dpdk.org @@ -18 +19 @@ -index 8407230ecf..0ebac88b83 100644 +index 96c363137e..f9f6dbbac8 100644