From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stable-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5866A0524
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Thu,  6 May 2021 00:45:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B254D410F2;
	Thu,  6 May 2021 00:45:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from linux.microsoft.com (linux.microsoft.com [13.77.154.182])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9CF74003C;
 Thu,  6 May 2021 00:45:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1086)
 id 1E6D520B7178; Wed,  5 May 2021 15:45:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com 1E6D520B7178
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com;
 s=default; t=1620254721;
 bh=DpqkKq+hwYEX2RTi2/e21W3cg989I6oDgyXaBl3nPYA=;
 h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From;
 b=EfFhaS3MwVYTJ1cBvHFdUibHldMCb0eE/d0sgkc1+7Dc1A9TnQDexI5apiMr+sLKP
 jVeR0Cyxe0IS/NHq/QAz15J69nkytaMW6U5os1Vvw8Nl0H7WSm/faccv9JLgM9A2Ov
 tC08O6371SSLw9nJ3E80Oj5vVIpqtGpKkGt2PaUQ=
Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 15:45:21 -0700
From: Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>, stable@dpdk.org,
 dev@dpdk.org, Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
 John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
Message-ID: <20210505224521.GA32065@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net>
References: <20210502025656.29910-1-dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>
 <20210504094822.7072ef01@sovereign>
 <20210505160042.GB13051@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net>
 <10660804.QYKOPib57F@thomas>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <10660804.QYKOPib57F@thomas>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/rxtx_callbacks: fix
 port ID format specifier
X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches <stable.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/stable>,
 <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:stable@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/stable>,
 <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "stable" <stable-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 11:39:23PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 05/05/2021 18:00, Tyler Retzlaff:
> > On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 09:48:22AM +0300, Dmitry Kozlyuk wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > what was the -Wformat clang on windows complaint?
> > > 
> > > PRIx16 would work, but I noticed that in other places where port ID is
> > > printed, the pattern above is used. IMO uniform approach is better.
> > 
> > ah, consistency. yes i'll have some of that. maybe one day in the future
> > we can change them all in one shot, but not today.
> > 
> > Acked-By: Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
> 
> I think PRIu16 is more appropriate.

works for me.

> Consistency doesn't matter if an approach is better.

well, there is some value in having consistency even if it is something
sub-optimal if we intend to do a mechanical change of all instances in
the future.

as a side question, what is the projects stance on getting more warnings
clean? there are a few not enabled that i'd really like to see e.g.
format, conversion, truncation etc..

i looked at lib/eal previously and there are... hundreds? of instances so
it's a non-trivial task. the problem i see is somehow getting to a
warnings clean state where we can enable -Werror in the CI pipeline but
at the same time figuring out how to prevent new instances from
appearing until we do.