From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55836A0C3F for ; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 01:20:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F3434003F; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 01:20:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from NAM12-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn8nam12on2052.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.237.52]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 920624003F for ; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 01:20:16 +0200 (CEST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=YAoNOBEjMY5jioV4erGYWdWqjfhJhT/WKULoKffDJYjYsJf+MDgGljuxX5jK8EN5j2bV8vCjgLLCCtoUZXwO2C8P+SJXnomh7wk5d5DCj+zSS2Vp7t1MWXGe8ZQQLz79KWKYeqUpnO76sTROKbxzFENZMQSfCiLjvXQBXsSLr3tz1d7RdXX/kywpj+wcKAH/k3NPQlAuRPLMinFdT/UZp+pOiVwGgFtlkIE0xLZH7Ylv52wmDbp1IQ492RCrHoI9ieR8Lm+4ijrBMwkiMYTd1W1cGHcoggD+x6CrG2iIGQqkzk0ZVhjM+fWvMTPlOwrI6/zhFyfXsWvRahZg/VFozA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=TkP/6pS4I1xq7HoQxX8QltwzpWFGx67LMr1JZfiSFrM=; b=A2pn7Ulhbu62YENT1ZkC8N26040hQlV3RNt7zdR8MgffwGQoCAzyTeMCF3wdd9gemIH7qMU+UmJ6O3x5nwtjjAIEb/rY0xwQ6et9OwLqFuMesqyxGmmYZT2dbIRlnlXmT7vwhkx35Mv0q0E27wm72tAvpchvDzRP4z8IrdZmMT3lYSQjBENG/Boar8pQeIvo9OHGn0cyBDWnCPsg0utUOEw3bMPS0GdJiA238V2y1EQFH7TiXlvLMfYpmj6uvGBTHVoLhrdovOyiNJDL5vjMm/xTOS+5n029STRwQXer/et02KCH82/9ZSBB00sv+KGR1//rksQCxHEYAbfSVKMZgw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 216.228.112.34) smtp.rcpttodomain=dpdk.org smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dmarc=pass (p=none sp=none pct=100) action=none header.from=nvidia.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=Nvidia.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=TkP/6pS4I1xq7HoQxX8QltwzpWFGx67LMr1JZfiSFrM=; b=MMvTIXFSn4z5cN42aEhqFjj+34sdCzDCH3R86dVDASFOR6ytNAhulvBTG7oCey2kdROzUoy3eNoXjCx4/BzqUHL6qGbhXcRhUrn1uL5VpWgaysIJpyh9HZz1WLAEm5Cj0Wd4JgG2d418w3s1p2d98UA44XAXIDfSSmc4Y1jXWm8Ni3rrKYlgwa4fU29envjFLVaR+rl/C72lX3Eg8Nnomkcyx7JshL8qvwWnrJ5oNddCmDuLsDuzCxXyU+mg37UfAt6zcWV4Q8y+ruJCTiwL2UWdrQL5dTfj5J4FbECIC8DaitgIUGHVCeTN7TshNAdlcg5cAI3Fa/TjgI49u5KXow== Received: from DM5PR07CA0140.namprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:13e::30) by BN6PR12MB1780.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:404:107::13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4219.24; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 23:20:14 +0000 Received: from DM6NAM11FT056.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:13e:cafe::17) by DM5PR07CA0140.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:3:13e::30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4219.20 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 23:20:14 +0000 X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 216.228.112.34) smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dpdk.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dpdk.org; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nvidia.com; Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of nvidia.com designates 216.228.112.34 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=216.228.112.34; helo=mail.nvidia.com; Received: from mail.nvidia.com (216.228.112.34) by DM6NAM11FT056.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.173.99) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.20.4219.21 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 23:20:13 +0000 Received: from nvidia.com (172.20.187.6) by HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 23:20:12 +0000 From: Xueming Li To: Kevin Traynor CC: Luca Boccassi , dpdk stable Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2021 07:04:15 +0800 Message-ID: <20210611230433.8208-161-xuemingl@nvidia.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20210611230433.8208-1-xuemingl@nvidia.com> References: <20210510160258.30982-229-xuemingl@nvidia.com> <20210611230433.8208-1-xuemingl@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [172.20.187.6] X-ClientProxiedBy: HQMAIL105.nvidia.com (172.20.187.12) To HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: f3e70e6f-6ea8-41e2-30af-08d92d2f777b X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: BN6PR12MB1780: X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:9508; X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:216.228.112.34; CTRY:US; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:mail.nvidia.com; PTR:schybrid03.nvidia.com; CAT:NONE; SFS:(4636009)(396003)(39860400002)(376002)(346002)(136003)(36840700001)(46966006)(86362001)(55016002)(36756003)(8676002)(316002)(36906005)(70206006)(53546011)(47076005)(82310400003)(26005)(70586007)(83380400001)(36860700001)(54906003)(356005)(966005)(478600001)(7636003)(82740400003)(336012)(6286002)(4326008)(6916009)(8936002)(186003)(16526019)(5660300002)(2616005)(2906002)(1076003)(7696005)(426003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; X-OriginatorOrg: Nvidia.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jun 2021 23:20:13.9881 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: f3e70e6f-6ea8-41e2-30af-08d92d2f777b X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a; Ip=[216.228.112.34]; Helo=[mail.nvidia.com] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DM6NAM11FT056.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN6PR12MB1780 Subject: [dpdk-stable] patch 'crypto/zuc: fix build with GCC 11' has been queued to stable release 20.11.2 X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" Hi, FYI, your patch has been queued to stable release 20.11.2 Note it hasn't been pushed to http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable yet. It will be pushed if I get no objections before 06/14/21. So please shout if anyone has objections. Also note that after the patch there's a diff of the upstream commit vs the patch applied to the branch. This will indicate if there was any rebasing needed to apply to the stable branch. If there were code changes for rebasing (ie: not only metadata diffs), please double check that the rebase was correctly done. Queued patches are on a temporary branch at: https://github.com/steevenlee/dpdk This queued commit can be viewed at: https://github.com/steevenlee/dpdk/commit/6156da10414a4f7e60f262ba80dd8b5bf9cccfd3 Thanks. Xueming Li --- >From 6156da10414a4f7e60f262ba80dd8b5bf9cccfd3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kevin Traynor Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 16:08:34 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] crypto/zuc: fix build with GCC 11 Cc: Luca Boccassi [ upstream commit 099db3d156038b792d97c29a6e2743369d7d50a5 ] GCC 11 complains that some arrays may be uninitialized in process_zuc_hash_op(). This is because their initialization depends on num_ops being > 0. This function is only called with num_ops > 0 because of checks in process_zuc_hash_op(). To remove the warning initialize the arrays. Fixes: 0b133c36ad7d ("crypto/zuc: support IPsec Multi-buffer lib v0.54") Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor --- drivers/crypto/zuc/rte_zuc_pmd.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/crypto/zuc/rte_zuc_pmd.c b/drivers/crypto/zuc/rte_zuc_pmd.c index a9ff318281..28ce961c77 100644 --- a/drivers/crypto/zuc/rte_zuc_pmd.c +++ b/drivers/crypto/zuc/rte_zuc_pmd.c @@ -238,11 +238,11 @@ process_zuc_hash_op(struct zuc_qp *qp, struct rte_crypto_op **ops, { unsigned int i; uint8_t processed_ops = 0; - uint8_t *src[ZUC_MAX_BURST]; + uint8_t *src[ZUC_MAX_BURST] = { 0 }; uint32_t *dst[ZUC_MAX_BURST]; - uint32_t length_in_bits[ZUC_MAX_BURST]; - uint8_t *iv[ZUC_MAX_BURST]; - const void *hash_keys[ZUC_MAX_BURST]; + uint32_t length_in_bits[ZUC_MAX_BURST] = { 0 }; + uint8_t *iv[ZUC_MAX_BURST] = { 0 }; + const void *hash_keys[ZUC_MAX_BURST] = { 0 }; struct zuc_session *sess; for (i = 0; i < num_ops; i++) { -- 2.25.1 --- Diff of the applied patch vs upstream commit (please double-check if non-empty: --- --- - 2021-06-12 06:54:00.631512700 +0800 +++ 0161-crypto-zuc-fix-build-with-GCC-11.patch 2021-06-12 06:53:56.630000000 +0800 @@ -1 +1 @@ -From 099db3d156038b792d97c29a6e2743369d7d50a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From 6156da10414a4f7e60f262ba80dd8b5bf9cccfd3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 @@ -4,0 +5,3 @@ +Cc: Luca Boccassi + +[ upstream commit 099db3d156038b792d97c29a6e2743369d7d50a5 ] @@ -16 +18,0 @@ -Cc: stable@dpdk.org @@ -24 +26 @@ -index aa50c12da6..42b669f188 100644 +index a9ff318281..28ce961c77 100644