From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DA0EA0C41 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 17:39:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77B54410F7; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 17:39:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-relay-internal-0.canonical.com (smtp-relay-internal-0.canonical.com [185.125.188.122]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A951410F7 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 17:39:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-ed1-f72.google.com (mail-ed1-f72.google.com [209.85.208.72]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay-internal-0.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 776B03F1B1 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 16:39:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canonical.com; s=20210705; t=1638290377; bh=J1bDfsAWPYrewd28SKjqFTYz4NDDOubUuExUyRpfSBU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=mc0S8Nk+DoGnGDYx93hsGqAaD9ypoZN3ku1n3ajsTYhBauWoEb1zzkzqmAhXHSEe9 dJ3CB5uWs2hHfeHzNUlswxky3FoPKDGKraOvCJDXd/GwwhS4gzVn3ujPtuz/QpUsuW foMeK0Ye8furjOKnfk5GFNEsI13pa3ysCjMTbz7UiVjF6Wv5774NUeWNgcDz1RfG/O HDoPV+6K43ljvl+3y15LdzESfUloLsi6vM99UNf1kX2aNyN9iC5oaM6t45bT4FMfAt 7JUENLo2MH/5b7RuK1ZCVxqbZL7H2WPCzppfyFBx6eManb6CGM8kot+RMKx3/k9e2N k0tLP2QHOAz7w== Received: by mail-ed1-f72.google.com with SMTP id c1-20020aa7c741000000b003e7bf1da4bcso17381330eds.21 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 08:39:37 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=J1bDfsAWPYrewd28SKjqFTYz4NDDOubUuExUyRpfSBU=; b=5yaHVibcS7RIBh2kAwcJK57kLi42nX/2MwjDl36WixsZJyU3kMHxp0s207uFnGk8tO Wvf3/HUl1q3A8qaTe356MzDS3/dZpxesswvcak+5ktAnazkayL1Ydzp3rv2+lNa5YL/H VgxqUnQay+0Chx1fym9YOfddX4hCGUpTBhVubBbFncJ2IEp2ctp1TegLI/HydNBg/auc ySm3hy5e/hURUrdRQAuBnImQHRYukEpkgCW1MTna4WnTo1dVGOws82K1EDYZF8tzKSs4 vRdF4cBylJZr44/yZEkRuF9W02YO67LaZTGDowuk9m2ACuJxoRQtxHrJo3+EAZPa7iDQ 6Xqw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Yl+R2bVtaDpUrgDExi9cP0c6Hqqad/7vGOBzWPTIemRMwiHN9 qpdaryq+yWgAPibNlIUZ5vLx5JhbE+4mKBd5HWtGweu+A+qiIW8kV94Kk1OFy8wSuViK/8clT7+ 30OXaoR6T+YwraDfc5uoQmLUk X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:524a:: with SMTP id t10mr142738edd.78.1638290377153; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 08:39:37 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwk8B9Tjr7dRBdvqLKV4FHHpIHm7HbOSkd4TpNKFmfffmdjnJxKYHfRX7783hYT3HXTi0S0sw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:524a:: with SMTP id t10mr142709edd.78.1638290376912; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 08:39:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([2001:67c:1560:8007::aac:c4ad]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id cs12sm9456701ejc.15.2021.11.30.08.39.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 30 Nov 2021 08:39:36 -0800 (PST) From: christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: Olivier Matz , dpdk stable Subject: patch 'mbuf: fix typo in comment' has been queued to stable release 19.11.11 Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 17:34:30 +0100 Message-Id: <20211130163605.2460997-66-christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.0 In-Reply-To: <20211130163605.2460997-1-christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> References: <20211130163605.2460997-1-christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Hi, FYI, your patch has been queued to stable release 19.11.11 Note it hasn't been pushed to http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable yet. It will be pushed if I get no objections before December 10th 2021. So please shout if anyone has objections. Also note that after the patch there's a diff of the upstream commit vs the patch applied to the branch. This will indicate if there was any rebasing needed to apply to the stable branch. If there were code changes for rebasing (ie: not only metadata diffs), please double check that the rebase was correctly done. Queued patches are on a temporary branch at: https://github.com/cpaelzer/dpdk-stable-queue This queued commit can be viewed at: https://github.com/cpaelzer/dpdk-stable-queue/commit/92df2aeaa1021e2fbdc8ab4c8e035a7a3f9f437e Thanks. Christian Ehrhardt --- >From 92df2aeaa1021e2fbdc8ab4c8e035a7a3f9f437e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stephen Hemminger Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 16:49:44 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] mbuf: fix typo in comment [ upstream commit d75eed0fbe4b942bc6df2e2908a8b5c2c30c99aa ] Misspelling of 'copied' Fixes: c3a90c381daa ("mbuf: add a copy routine") Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger Acked-by: Olivier Matz --- lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h index 6d080527f6..55205b8ece 100644 --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h @@ -1288,7 +1288,7 @@ rte_pktmbuf_clone(struct rte_mbuf *md, struct rte_mempool *mp); * set of mbufs. The private data are is not copied. * * @param m - * The packet mbuf to be copiedd. + * The packet mbuf to be copied. * @param mp * The mempool from which the "clone" mbufs are allocated. * @param offset -- 2.34.0 --- Diff of the applied patch vs upstream commit (please double-check if non-empty: --- --- - 2021-11-30 16:50:09.794226112 +0100 +++ 0066-mbuf-fix-typo-in-comment.patch 2021-11-30 16:50:05.734873118 +0100 @@ -1 +1 @@ -From d75eed0fbe4b942bc6df2e2908a8b5c2c30c99aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From 92df2aeaa1021e2fbdc8ab4c8e035a7a3f9f437e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 @@ -5,0 +6,2 @@ +[ upstream commit d75eed0fbe4b942bc6df2e2908a8b5c2c30c99aa ] + @@ -9 +10,0 @@ -Cc: stable@dpdk.org @@ -14 +15 @@ - lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 2 +- + lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 2 +- @@ -17,5 +18,5 @@ -diff --git a/lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf.h b/lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf.h -index a3bfc9fe9a..ec2f4bb188 100644 ---- a/lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf.h -+++ b/lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf.h -@@ -1430,7 +1430,7 @@ rte_pktmbuf_clone(struct rte_mbuf *md, struct rte_mempool *mp); +diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h +index 6d080527f6..55205b8ece 100644 +--- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h ++++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h +@@ -1288,7 +1288,7 @@ rte_pktmbuf_clone(struct rte_mbuf *md, struct rte_mempool *mp);