From: Wenwu Ma <wenwux.ma@intel.com>
To: xiaoyun.li@intel.com, aman.deep.singh@intel.com,
yuying.zhang@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: jiayu.hu@intel.com, yinan.wang@intel.com, xingguang.he@intel.com,
Wenwu Ma <wenwux.ma@intel.com>,
stable@dpdk.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: perform SW IP checksum for GRO/GSO packets
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 09:35:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220511093536.28734-1-wenwux.ma@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220511013705.24602-1-wenwux.ma@intel.com>
The GRO/GSO library doesn't re-calculate checksums for
merged/fragmented packets. If users want the packets to
have correct IP checksums, they should select HW IP
checksum calculation for the port which the packets are
transmitted to. But if the port doesn't support HW IP
checksum, users may perform a SW IP checksum. This patch
add the code about it.
Fixes: b7091f1dcfbc ("app/testpmd: enable the heavyweight mode TCP/IPv4 GRO")
Fixes: 52f38a2055ed ("app/testpmd: enable TCP/IPv4 VxLAN and GRE GSO")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Wenwu Ma <wenwux.ma@intel.com>
---
app/test-pmd/csumonly.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff --git a/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c b/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c
index 8b6665d6f3..e69f31d92c 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/csumonly.c
@@ -778,6 +778,26 @@ pkt_copy_split(const struct rte_mbuf *pkt)
return md[0];
}
+/*
+ * Re-calculate IP checksum for merged/fragmented packets.
+ */
+static void
+pkts_ip_csum_recalc(struct rte_mbuf **pkts_burst, const uint16_t nb_pkts, uint64_t tx_offloads)
+{
+ int i;
+ struct rte_ipv4_hdr *ipv4_hdr;
+ for (i = 0; i < nb_pkts; i++) {
+ if ((pkts_burst[i]->ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_IPV4) &&
+ (tx_offloads & RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM) == 0) {
+ ipv4_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(pkts_burst[i],
+ struct rte_ipv4_hdr *,
+ pkts_burst[i]->l2_len);
+ ipv4_hdr->hdr_checksum = 0;
+ ipv4_hdr->hdr_checksum = rte_ipv4_cksum(ipv4_hdr);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
/*
* Receive a burst of packets, and for each packet:
* - parse packet, and try to recognize a supported packet type (1)
@@ -1098,6 +1118,8 @@ pkt_burst_checksum_forward(struct fwd_stream *fs)
fs->gro_times = 0;
}
}
+
+ pkts_ip_csum_recalc(pkts_burst, nb_rx, tx_offloads);
}
#endif
@@ -1131,6 +1153,8 @@ pkt_burst_checksum_forward(struct fwd_stream *fs)
tx_pkts_burst = gso_segments;
nb_rx = nb_segments;
+
+ pkts_ip_csum_recalc(tx_pkts_burst, nb_rx, tx_offloads);
} else
#endif
tx_pkts_burst = pkts_burst;
--
2.25.1
next parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-11 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20220511013705.24602-1-wenwux.ma@intel.com>
2022-05-11 9:35 ` Wenwu Ma [this message]
2022-05-12 1:07 ` [PATCH v3] " Wenwu Ma
2022-05-12 1:33 ` Hu, Jiayu
2022-05-17 2:56 ` Ling, WeiX
2022-05-17 16:02 ` Zhang, Yuying
2022-05-19 8:23 ` Andrew Rybchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220511093536.28734-1-wenwux.ma@intel.com \
--to=wenwux.ma@intel.com \
--cc=aman.deep.singh@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jiayu.hu@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=xiaoyun.li@intel.com \
--cc=xingguang.he@intel.com \
--cc=yinan.wang@intel.com \
--cc=yuying.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).