From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Quentin Armitage <quentin@armitage.org.uk>
Cc: Reshma Pattan <reshma.pattan@intel.com>,
Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>,
dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] libpcapng: fix timestamp wrapping in output files
Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 14:04:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220517140440.44776434@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220517100115.157888-1-quentin@armitage.org.uk>
On Tue, 17 May 2022 11:01:15 +0100
Quentin Armitage <quentin@armitage.org.uk> wrote:
> In pcap_tsc_to_ns(), delta * NSEC_PER_SEC will overflow approx 8
> seconds after pcap_init is called when using a TSC with a frequency
> of 2.5GHz.
>
> To avoid the overflow, update the saved time and TSC value once
> delta >= tsc_hz.
>
> Fixes: 8d23ce8f5ee ("pcapng: add new library for writing pcapng files")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Armitage <quentin@armitage.org.uk>
> ---
> v2:
> - Don't call clock_gettime() in fast path
> - Update pcapng_time.ns and pcapng_time.cycles to ensure delta < tsc_hz
> - Stop using constructor to initialise pcapng_time.tsc_hz since
> it is not initialised until rte_eal_init() is called
> - use mean value of TSC before and after call to clock_gettime()
> - only call rte_get_tsc_hz() once
> - use rte_reciprocal functions instead of division
>
> lib/pcapng/rte_pcapng.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Side note: looked at an alternative using the timestamp offset option described in the
PCAPNG IETF standard.
if_tsoffset:
The if_tsoffset option is a 64-bit signed integer value that
specifies an offset (in seconds) that must be added to the timestamp of
each packet to obtain the absolute timestamp of a packet. If the option
is missing, the timestamps stored in the packet MUST be considered
absolute timestamps. The time zone of the offset can be specified with
the option if_tzone.
But not supported even by current wireshark so not useful.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-17 21:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-07 16:12 [PATCH] " Quentin Armitage
2022-05-11 16:08 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-05-11 16:46 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-05-14 17:14 ` Quentin Armitage
2022-05-16 13:26 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-05-17 10:01 ` [PATCH v2] " Quentin Armitage
2022-05-17 15:15 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-06-01 14:38 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-05-17 21:04 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220517140440.44776434@hermes.local \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
--cc=quentin@armitage.org.uk \
--cc=reshma.pattan@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).