From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stable-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2773A0503
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Wed, 18 May 2022 12:17:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB8E942823;
	Wed, 18 May 2022 12:17:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com
 (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCEBB42B8A
 for <stable@dpdk.org>; Wed, 18 May 2022 12:17:50 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;
 s=mimecast20190719; t=1652869070;
 h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
 bh=kYkte8g+iQLXO5VsFitqTI3owdfv6sMTeeMCZFnmLGY=;
 b=IrBuII/rNfSjp3Dlr9q20P/2asegQc/pRuSpytIlIt0M04U5sMqP7d5T8BlT+gKHp5Ssx1
 aUn2xjadLGYEBigu+d162u5xLJWMnd3QNWPX7qhquEOrnKMo92wUGBHQnnx1WTrtCOH2Ye
 fLcHGgvp8vlLdUxiAUkbAeDVdCMDrdY=
Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com
 [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS
 (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id
 us-mta-562-yuv1_gaeNdCs6b96toT1-Q-1; Wed, 18 May 2022 06:17:45 -0400
X-MC-Unique: yuv1_gaeNdCs6b96toT1-Q-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com
 [10.11.54.10])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFB541C06901;
 Wed, 18 May 2022 10:17:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from fchome.home (unknown [10.40.195.61])
 by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C4CB401E98;
 Wed, 18 May 2022 10:17:40 +0000 (UTC)
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: thomas@monjalon.net, ferruh.yigit@xilinx.com, stable@dpdk.org,
 Apeksha Gupta <apeksha.gupta@nxp.com>,
 Sachin Saxena <sachin.saxena@nxp.com>
Subject: [PATCH 05/12] net/enetfec: fix build with GCC 12
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 12:16:50 +0200
Message-Id: <20220518101657.1230416-6-david.marchand@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220518101657.1230416-1-david.marchand@redhat.com>
References: <20220518101657.1230416-1-david.marchand@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.85 on 10.11.54.10
Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com;
 auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=david.marchand@redhat.com
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches <stable.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/stable>,
 <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:stable@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/stable>,
 <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org

GCC 12 raises the following warning:

../drivers/net/enetfec/enet_ethdev.c: In function
        ‘enetfec_rx_queue_setup’:
../drivers/net/enetfec/enet_ethdev.c:473:9: error: array
        subscript 1 is
    above array bounds of ‘uint32_t[1]’ {aka ‘unsigned int[1]’}
        [-Werror=array-bounds]
  473 | rte_write32(rte_cpu_to_le_32(fep->bd_addr_p_r[queue_idx]),
      | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  474 |     (uint8_t *)fep->hw_baseaddr_v + ENETFEC_RD_START(queue_idx));
      |     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ../drivers/net/enetfec/enet_ethdev.c:9:
../drivers/net/enetfec/enet_ethdev.h:113:33: note: while referencing
        ‘bd_addr_p_r’
  113 | uint32_t                bd_addr_p_r[ENETFEC_MAX_Q];
      |                                 ^~~~~~~~~~~

This driver properly announces that it only supports 1 rxq.
Silence this warning by adding an explicit check on the queue id.

Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/net/enetfec/enet_ethdev.c | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/enetfec/enet_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/enetfec/enet_ethdev.c
index 714f8ac7ec..c938e58204 100644
--- a/drivers/net/enetfec/enet_ethdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/enetfec/enet_ethdev.c
@@ -2,9 +2,12 @@
  * Copyright 2020-2021 NXP
  */
 
+#include <inttypes.h>
+
 #include <ethdev_vdev.h>
 #include <ethdev_driver.h>
 #include <rte_io.h>
+
 #include "enet_pmd_logs.h"
 #include "enet_ethdev.h"
 #include "enet_regs.h"
@@ -454,6 +457,12 @@ enetfec_rx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
+	if (queue_idx >= ENETFEC_MAX_Q) {
+		ENETFEC_PMD_ERR("Invalid queue id %" PRIu16 ", max %d\n",
+			queue_idx, ENETFEC_MAX_Q);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
 	/* allocate receive queue */
 	rxq = rte_zmalloc(NULL, sizeof(*rxq), RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE);
 	if (rxq == NULL) {
-- 
2.36.1