From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stable-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F8C5A0554
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 17:34:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78CE64280B;
	Sat, 11 Jun 2022 17:34:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-pj1-f45.google.com (mail-pj1-f45.google.com
 [209.85.216.45]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4758040150
 for <stable@dpdk.org>; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 17:34:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-pj1-f45.google.com with SMTP id
 o33-20020a17090a0a2400b001ea806e48c6so2010958pjo.1
 for <stable@dpdk.org>; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 08:34:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=networkplumber-org.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112;
 h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references
 :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=YsbEEOotqAUGUxiL8/qW20c7eMym5aNLl4setaDArpc=;
 b=EiLd04+Fy487+TgxLyU/++tbmv7DPCURI5DTnSt46Rv9hFwP3B7Egwaj8Dq+CVGjfc
 tcMjOIRcioD1l0pXp+RF8GV+9TR+p9mU9qgyOyqDbApNsn5Z6ZYMToqj2hLNyPCV/tiz
 8HrwM30Cwpl7XWnuy05wUrnU2w/BH2yWH3rDvlSIYR0K//QorOJ+80G/YESeYDEhV9cW
 5zoV+ifhFlmeBz7GG2+ftmtFjts2lXJ5N/lD2RPTTO7UypHsufAxswhQJ4Qbk7kFI4xS
 PrPYfTbicXnmD87F6wfEVvVKhkx/Uvov5NnxVOovwUmkbmWvAgIv8FmEk1mOowIDGynq
 fZmA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
 :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=YsbEEOotqAUGUxiL8/qW20c7eMym5aNLl4setaDArpc=;
 b=tbeSLOQveJGy/mODmzISco1KFocNmF6R3Q2q07eAhKAsnBJgHCzxu7scI4c8cjDuaU
 pvVgaNHeiqj52YhV/mA8aUvHl/JalDOPbV4iz/f7OG6eGKKyvbL+qSruqcS7wCmkxEqt
 smEh+sxAlXEcf6xoqdOmZ87v9MYsJQz641qC5fCo/SC0sXLR5qlbxpD/sQFQjOZnWRv+
 EXVT3ht5784jKmuxSTwo7shjJTafnbxPHDjuXBMS8ekMdd6RmyZiY3kkMXKJOG2uhPCU
 pe30KSmaujoToMi72eHlwVFdslDyo4YmKIWaRIj9bwvBb3MFREFJN995WN550uJ5JxSr
 6IvQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530KCM7owwwxcW92AO7sqSQqKhQgfSyEkaj7dagtDSl2/tEpdb3j
 0+9W9hKUyAWfjWXyhbRmR0u8sw7gcivhj5Cs
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxRpnFLbD8gVd6v1SFLjFAyyxdhq50VwFrSvrAxOPLNU0MUtcDV/wke8AxglXx0LUbKqxE0wA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:4045:b0:168:b7ca:19b0 with SMTP id
 n5-20020a170903404500b00168b7ca19b0mr9243753pla.66.1654961686470; 
 Sat, 11 Jun 2022 08:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hermes.local (204-195-112-199.wavecable.com. [204.195.112.199])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 p11-20020a170903248b00b0015e8d4eb1c8sm1700441plw.18.2022.06.11.08.34.45
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Sat, 11 Jun 2022 08:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2022 08:34:43 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, thomas@monjalon.net, ferruh.yigit@xilinx.com,
 stable@dpdk.org, Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com>, Michal Krawczyk
 <mk@semihalf.com>, Shai Brandes <shaibran@amazon.com>, Evgeny Schemeilin
 <evgenys@amazon.com>, Igor Chauskin <igorch@amazon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] net/ena: fix build with GCC 12
Message-ID: <20220611083443.0318ee73@hermes.local>
In-Reply-To: <20220518101657.1230416-5-david.marchand@redhat.com>
References: <20220518101657.1230416-1-david.marchand@redhat.com>
 <20220518101657.1230416-5-david.marchand@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches <stable.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/stable>,
 <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:stable@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/stable>,
 <mailto:stable-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org

On Wed, 18 May 2022 12:16:49 +0200
David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote:

> GCC 12 raises the following warning:
>=20
> In file included from ../lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h:46,
>                  from ../lib/mbuf/rte_mbuf.h:38,
>                  from ../lib/net/rte_ether.h:22,
>                  from ../drivers/net/ena/ena_ethdev.h:10,
>                  from ../drivers/net/ena/ena_rss.c:6:
> ../drivers/net/ena/ena_rss.c: In function =E2=80=98ena_rss_key_fill=E2=80=
=99:
> ../lib/eal/x86/include/rte_memcpy.h:370:9: warning: array subscript 64 is
>         outside array bounds of =E2=80=98uint8_t[40]=E2=80=99 {aka =E2=80=
=98unsigned char[40]=E2=80=99}
>         [-Warray-bounds]
>   370 | rte_mov32((uint8_t *)dst + 2 * 32, (const uint8_t *)src + 2 * 32);
>       | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ../drivers/net/ena/ena_rss.c:51:24: note: while referencing =E2=80=98defa=
ult_key=E2=80=99
>    51 | static uint8_t default_key[ENA_HASH_KEY_SIZE];
>       |                ^~~~~~~~~~~
>=20
> This is a false positive because the copied size is checked against
> ENA_HASH_KEY_SIZE in a (build) assert.
> Silence this warning by calling memcpy with the minimal size.
>=20
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>=20
> Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> ---


Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>