From: Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@huawei.com>
To: <dev@dpdk.org>, <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
<ferruh.yigit@amd.com>, <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: <stable@dpdk.org>, <fengchengwen@huawei.com>,
<yisen.zhuang@huawei.com>, <liudongdong3@huawei.com>,
<lihuisong@huawei.com>, <haijie1@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 18/19] net/hns3: fix VF mark wrong message processed
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 15:22:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220930072220.20753-19-liudongdong3@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220930072220.20753-1-liudongdong3@huawei.com>
From: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
VF's command receive queue was mainly used to receive mailbox messages
from PF. There are two type mailbox messages: request response message
and message pushed by PF.
There are two types of threads that can handle these messages:
1) the interrupt thread of the main process: it could handle both types
of messages.
2) other threads: it could only handle request response messages.
The collaboration mechanism between the two type threads is that other
threads set the opcode of processed messages to zero so that the
interrupt thread of the main process does not process these messages
again.
Unfortunately, the other threads mark the message pointed to by the
crq->next-to-use variable which is fixed in the loop, not the message
pointed to by the next-to-use variable.
This patch fixes it.
Fixes: dbbbad23e380 ("net/hns3: fix VF handling LSC event in secondary process")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@huawei.com>
---
drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.c b/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.c
index 910a16c999..8e0a58aa02 100644
--- a/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.c
@@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ hns3_handle_mbx_msg_out_intr(struct hns3_hw *hw)
* Clear opcode to inform intr thread don't process
* again.
*/
- crq->desc[crq->next_to_use].opcode = 0;
+ crq->desc[next_to_use].opcode = 0;
}
scan_next:
--
2.22.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-30 7:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-30 7:22 [PATCH 00/19] some bugfixes and clean code for hns3 - part2 Dongdong Liu
2022-09-30 7:22 ` [PATCH 01/19] net/hns3: fix have no valid RSS rule Dongdong Liu
2022-09-30 7:22 ` [PATCH 02/19] net/hns3: fix RSS filter restore Dongdong Liu
2022-09-30 7:22 ` [PATCH 03/19] net/hns3: fix the lock protection of RSS flow rule Dongdong Liu
2022-09-30 7:22 ` [PATCH 04/19] net/hns3: fix RSS flow rule restore failed Dongdong Liu
2022-09-30 7:22 ` [PATCH 05/19] net/hns3: move flow direction rule recovery position Dongdong Liu
2022-09-30 7:22 ` [PATCH 06/19] net/hns3: fix hns3 restore filter function input Dongdong Liu
2022-09-30 7:22 ` [PATCH 07/19] net/hns3: fix gcov compile warning Dongdong Liu
2022-09-30 7:22 ` [PATCH 08/19] net/hns3: fix incorrect packet type report for GENEVE Dongdong Liu
2022-09-30 7:22 ` [PATCH 09/19] net/hns3: fix magic numbers Dongdong Liu
2022-09-30 7:22 ` [PATCH 10/19] net/hns3: fix header file self contained Dongdong Liu
2022-09-30 7:22 ` [PATCH 11/19] net/hns3: remove unused structure definition Dongdong Liu
2022-09-30 7:22 ` [PATCH 12/19] net/hns3: do not use reserved identifier macro Dongdong Liu
2022-09-30 7:22 ` [PATCH 13/19] net/hns3: fix fail to enable IPV4 or IPV6 packet RSS Dongdong Liu
2022-09-30 7:22 ` [PATCH 14/19] net/hns3: fix some spelling errors Dongdong Liu
2022-09-30 7:22 ` [PATCH 15/19] net/hns3: fix inconsistent RSS behavior Dongdong Liu
2022-09-30 7:22 ` [PATCH 16/19] net/hns3: add check for L3 and L4 type Dongdong Liu
2022-09-30 7:22 ` [PATCH 17/19] net/hns3: revert fix mailbox communication with HW Dongdong Liu
2022-09-30 7:22 ` Dongdong Liu [this message]
2022-09-30 7:22 ` [PATCH 19/19] net/hns3: fix the obtaination of minimum Tx frame length Dongdong Liu
2022-10-05 6:18 ` [PATCH 00/19] some bugfixes and clean code for hns3 - part2 Andrew Rybchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220930072220.20753-19-liudongdong3@huawei.com \
--to=liudongdong3@huawei.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
--cc=haijie1@huawei.com \
--cc=lihuisong@huawei.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=yisen.zhuang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).