From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
To: Aman Singh <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>,
Yuying Zhang <yuying.zhang@intel.com>,
Michael Qiu <qiudayu@chinac.com>,
Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, <stable@dpdk.org>, <michael.qiu@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix link check condition on port start
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 22:45:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230127224514.2650827-1-ferruh.yigit@amd.com> (raw)
In testpmd port start function, 'need_check_link_status' variable is
used to detect if a link check is required after port is started.
Intention is if at least one port is started, link check should be
called, and initially 'need_check_link_status' used as following:
```
start_port
need_check_link_status <- 0
for each p in port
ret <- config & start p
if ret is failure
break
need_check_link_status <- 1
if need_check_link_status
check link
else
log failure message
```
Later above logic is modified [1] because when there is no port at all,
'need_check_link_status' remains zero and it causes and error message
although this is a valid use case.
For this code updated as following:
```
start_port
need_check_link_status <- -1
for each p in port
need_check_link_status <- 0
ret <- config & start p
if ret is failure
break
need_check_link_status <- 1
if need_check_link_status == 1
check link
else if need_check_link_status == 0
log failure message
```
This modification works fine if 'start_port()' called for a single port,
but function support both single port and all ports with 'RTE_PORT_ALL'
parameter to the function.
When it is called for all ports, above logic is wrong because
'need_check_link_status' value reset on each iteration of the loop.
For multi port case, if last port fails to start,
'need_check_link_status' will be zero and no link check will be done and
it will log a wrong error message.
Overall there are three cases to cover:
* No port exist at all
* All ports are already started
* At least on port started successfully
To cover all three cases, one option is to use 'need_check_link_status'
have multiple values to reflect above cases.
But meaning of values are not obvious which can lead more issues in the
future.
Instead converting 'need_check_link_status' to multiple boolean
variables whose names are self explanatory.
This fixes issue and link check called if at least one port started
successfully as intended.
Also log message only printed when at least one port exists and all
ports are already in started state.
[1]
Fixes: 92d2703e2c43 ("app/testpmd: fix log with no bound device")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
---
Cc: michael.qiu@intel.com
---
app/test-pmd/testpmd.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
index 134d79a55547..2a1125c9fe81 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
@@ -2880,7 +2880,7 @@ update_bonding_port_dev_conf(portid_t bond_pid)
int
start_port(portid_t pid)
{
- int diag, need_check_link_status = -1;
+ int diag;
portid_t pi;
portid_t p_pi = RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS;
portid_t pl[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS];
@@ -2891,6 +2891,9 @@ start_port(portid_t pid)
queueid_t qi;
struct rte_port *port;
struct rte_eth_hairpin_cap cap;
+ bool at_least_one_port_exist = false;
+ bool all_ports_already_started = true;
+ bool at_least_one_port_successfully_started = false;
if (port_id_is_invalid(pid, ENABLED_WARN))
return 0;
@@ -2906,11 +2909,13 @@ start_port(portid_t pid)
continue;
}
- need_check_link_status = 0;
+ at_least_one_port_exist = true;
+
port = &ports[pi];
- if (port->port_status == RTE_PORT_STOPPED)
+ if (port->port_status == RTE_PORT_STOPPED) {
port->port_status = RTE_PORT_HANDLING;
- else {
+ all_ports_already_started = false;
+ } else {
fprintf(stderr, "Port %d is now not stopped\n", pi);
continue;
}
@@ -3130,15 +3135,14 @@ start_port(portid_t pid)
printf("Port %d: " RTE_ETHER_ADDR_PRT_FMT "\n", pi,
RTE_ETHER_ADDR_BYTES(&port->eth_addr));
- /* at least one port started, need checking link status */
- need_check_link_status = 1;
+ at_least_one_port_successfully_started = true;
pl[cfg_pi++] = pi;
}
- if (need_check_link_status == 1 && !no_link_check)
+ if (at_least_one_port_successfully_started && !no_link_check)
check_all_ports_link_status(RTE_PORT_ALL);
- else if (need_check_link_status == 0)
+ else if (at_least_one_port_exist & all_ports_already_started)
fprintf(stderr, "Please stop the ports first\n");
if (hairpin_mode & 0xf) {
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2023-01-27 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-27 22:45 Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2023-02-03 9:56 ` Singh, Aman Deep
2023-02-08 22:54 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230127224514.2650827-1-ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
--to=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
--cc=aman.deep.singh@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=michael.qiu@intel.com \
--cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
--cc=qiudayu@chinac.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=yuying.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).