patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, thomas@monjalon.net, stephen@networkplumber.org,
	stable@dpdk.org, Dodji Seketeli <dodji@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] eal: fix failure path race setting new thread affinity
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 14:20:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230317212049.GA26815@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8zAfOFpK8JpR_f_VGV43XfMGkRF_EL1o2xOo5FRShDSXA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 07:51:25PM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 3:50 PM Tyler Retzlaff
> <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com> wrote:
> > > > -struct thread_routine_ctx {
> > > > +struct thread_start_context {
> > > >         rte_thread_func thread_func;
> > > > -       void *routine_args;
> > > > +       void *thread_args;
> > > > +       const rte_thread_attr_t *thread_attr;
> > > > +       pthread_mutex_t wrapper_mutex;
> > > > +       pthread_cond_t wrapper_cond;
> > > > +       int wrapper_ret;
> > > > +       volatile int wrapper_done;
> > >
> > > One question.
> > >
> > > I see that wrapper_done is accessed under wrapper_mutex.
> > > Is volatile needed?
> >
> > I'm not entirely certain. i'm being cautious since i can conceive of the
> > load in the loop being optimized as a single load by the compiler. but
> > again i'm not sure, i always like to learn if someone knows better.
> 
> After an interesting discussion with Dodji on C99 and side effects
> (5.1.2.3/2 and 5.1.2.3/3), I am a bit more convinced that we don't
> need this volatile.

Thanks for the references, based on the reading i agree we can drop the
volatile.

> 
> 
> >
> > >
> > > (nit: a boolean is probably enough too)
> >
> > I have no issue with it being a _Bool if you want to adjust it for that
> > i certainly don't object. ordinarily i would use _Bool but a lot of dpdk
> > code seems to prefer int so that's why i chose it. if we use the macro
> > bool then we should include stdbool.h directly into this translation
> > unit.
> >
> > >
> > > I was thinking of squashing below diff:
> >
> > Yeah, no objection. you can decide if you want to keep the volatile or
> > not and add the stdbool.h include.
> >
> > Thanks for reviewing, appreciate it.
> 
> This is a fix but this v5 had an additional change in affinity setting
> (switching to rte_thread_set_affinity()).
> To be on the safe side wrt backport, I'll also revert to calling
> rte_thread_set_affinity_by_id as this is what was being used before.
> And this removes the need for patch 1.

Is it worth merging the const patch but not backporting? I'm not fussed
either way.

> 
> Sending a v6 soon, so that it goes through the CI before rc3.

Yes, great.

Thanks David!

> 
> 
> -- 
> David Marchand

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-17 21:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-02 18:44 [PATCH 1/2] eal: fix failure race and behavior of thread create Tyler Retzlaff
2023-03-02 18:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] eal/windows: fix create thread failure behavior Tyler Retzlaff
2023-03-07 14:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] eal: fix failure race and behavior of thread create David Marchand
2023-03-09  9:17   ` David Marchand
2023-03-09  9:58     ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-03-09 20:49       ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-03-09 21:05         ` David Marchand
     [not found] ` <1678750267-3829-1-git-send-email-roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
2023-03-13 23:31   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] eal: fix failure path race setting new thread affinity Tyler Retzlaff
     [not found] ` <1678833856-9314-1-git-send-email-roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
2023-03-14 22:44   ` [PATCH v3 " Tyler Retzlaff
     [not found] ` <1678834239-11569-1-git-send-email-roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
2023-03-14 22:50   ` [PATCH v4 " Tyler Retzlaff
2023-03-15  1:20     ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-03-15  1:26       ` Tyler Retzlaff
     [not found] ` <1678925050-1955-1-git-send-email-roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
2023-03-16  0:04   ` Tyler Retzlaff
     [not found] ` <1678925224-2706-1-git-send-email-roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
2023-03-16  0:07   ` [PATCH v5 " Tyler Retzlaff
2023-03-17 10:45     ` David Marchand
2023-03-17 14:49       ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-03-17 18:51         ` David Marchand
2023-03-17 21:20           ` Tyler Retzlaff [this message]
2023-03-17 18:52 ` [PATCH v6] eal/unix: fix thread creation David Marchand
2023-03-17 21:24   ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-03-18 18:26     ` David Marchand
2023-03-18 18:26   ` David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230317212049.GA26815@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net \
    --to=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dodji@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).