From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D5C843E57 for ; Sat, 13 Apr 2024 15:00:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 684F340294; Sat, 13 Apr 2024 15:00:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from NAM11-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn8nam11on2046.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.236.46]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BEF9400D6 for ; Sat, 13 Apr 2024 15:00:17 +0200 (CEST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=l8o5ltDxkvqBkbGPuvNaddbK9lg1VOXxmQKzhjnSTt8UV1ktvyzuv6a2zcfzmFBDrPohP8AtHCTMbDuGZa082L3v/4Gq3yt8/XmCK8O27mE60AoTM2pMIOk3Hr3lqbwwBiw5nkXupWrz4KVij8M9I5fyb8kAkLl4ioscSKbKc5D6SmWOFcTa0Wf5mGm+7Zn0DPlxVkmfG5ZlqknSI4ndzefHJfL+j6UdcjU5hKXQKEUS54D+fQiPh0FhOIh0aZAMi9UfhVBD3+3PJsIJCBIMh9m0V09N8Hcvca+YhebisA20ZUAmb1Czl/6e791WL7ZrgupsX2v7IUJal/mq3ehmxw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=1H8I0zICAZM3zhmaCxsOWkRl/QI0ICiwOitHcC1weyc=; b=h0hbHpAcTBctooTocvIUXFn9PlSJ+lcjneNKCNdTro/lhjk89IPLA/sZR9AMBGYyND6hOLBMyZ6H2Zw+fEaRlrh3E/3qIxx787XPAkaofy8P4D8rtW53Fgme5h9hUctJBQeeAQh0dvl/gF61CnUIbCyuc60i6fszkd/LhhStTDQqOfB7KIT8RXijkakEOPNB2tl1fniSu+yHHqKwsSRyWs+JHIVbmEkNBZyf0H46sSMc9zYp8oUqWqO6WMhnWXk0T9F/qk7Qf1gdQtkXPAxnEL/HftiBo3R/rn9f2aZxdFFJk3OF1Ht8gSLWzNw4Zf4eEx05vFF9lUZPEWkHcl9zEA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 216.228.117.161) smtp.rcpttodomain=corigine.com smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dmarc=pass (p=reject sp=reject pct=100) action=none header.from=nvidia.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none (0) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=Nvidia.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=1H8I0zICAZM3zhmaCxsOWkRl/QI0ICiwOitHcC1weyc=; b=DC1fWmoadcF+6vEUEXgD+K9AHP5qDgI1aJQc0fFOV5//J1DDwv2iAw0xR3yFaKq0uTY7cUZt47W2o8fM0jZHV7eZGfWDBxzqwxSCjpp2DV07Rh2NcHGhmqt5t2Q7NQ4LT5hIBluaN9bnrgvdRyHI1AuuxgG+BKi4B2OWfitudrnUgJuFe/j2Hr6q9FqWFCNtVhIKZUlD5DnGGUpFkGiVryBahKFy9dFzT1wdo2rs3ldZBGdUxVmV44A3iOe2qYL0e29jX/rkv0IdtVkUnertaAN58lByig9rnfVtKUImj6U5LA+xfsxgOqfFsAzdQvnf3e89/hK7WSDaN6rPYuWE2w== Received: from SJ0PR05CA0039.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:33f::14) by LV3PR12MB9409.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:21d::16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.7409.46; Sat, 13 Apr 2024 13:00:07 +0000 Received: from MWH0EPF000989E8.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:33f:cafe::fa) by SJ0PR05CA0039.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:a03:33f::14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.7495.12 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 13 Apr 2024 13:00:06 +0000 X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 216.228.117.161) smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nvidia.com; Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of nvidia.com designates 216.228.117.161 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=216.228.117.161; helo=mail.nvidia.com; pr=C Received: from mail.nvidia.com (216.228.117.161) by MWH0EPF000989E8.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.167.241.135) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.7452.22 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 13 Apr 2024 13:00:06 +0000 Received: from rnnvmail201.nvidia.com (10.129.68.8) by mail.nvidia.com (10.129.200.67) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.986.41; Sat, 13 Apr 2024 05:59:54 -0700 Received: from nvidia.com (10.126.231.35) by rnnvmail201.nvidia.com (10.129.68.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1258.12; Sat, 13 Apr 2024 05:59:53 -0700 From: Xueming Li To: Shihong Wang CC: Chaoyong He , Peng Zhang , dpdk stable Subject: patch 'examples/ipsec-secgw: fix Rx queue ID in Rx callback' has been queued to stable release 23.11.1 Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 20:49:50 +0800 Message-ID: <20240413125005.725659-110-xuemingl@nvidia.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240413125005.725659-1-xuemingl@nvidia.com> References: <20240305094757.439387-1-xuemingl@nvidia.com> <20240413125005.725659-1-xuemingl@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.126.231.35] X-ClientProxiedBy: rnnvmail201.nvidia.com (10.129.68.8) To rnnvmail201.nvidia.com (10.129.68.8) X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: MWH0EPF000989E8:EE_|LV3PR12MB9409:EE_ X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 80d554f3-c20d-4ac6-8e7f-08dc5bb9a431 X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:216.228.117.161; CTRY:US; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:mail.nvidia.com; PTR:dc6edge2.nvidia.com; CAT:NONE; SFS:(13230031)(376005)(1800799015)(82310400014)(36860700004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; X-OriginatorOrg: Nvidia.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Apr 2024 13:00:06.0618 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 80d554f3-c20d-4ac6-8e7f-08dc5bb9a431 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a; Ip=[216.228.117.161]; Helo=[mail.nvidia.com] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: MWH0EPF000989E8.namprd02.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: LV3PR12MB9409 X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Hi, FYI, your patch has been queued to stable release 23.11.1 Note it hasn't been pushed to http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable yet. It will be pushed if I get no objections before 04/15/24. So please shout if anyone has objections. Also note that after the patch there's a diff of the upstream commit vs the patch applied to the branch. This will indicate if there was any rebasing needed to apply to the stable branch. If there were code changes for rebasing (ie: not only metadata diffs), please double check that the rebase was correctly done. Queued patches are on a temporary branch at: https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/log/?h=23.11-staging This queued commit can be viewed at: https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/commit/?h=23.11-staging&id=f7909e3c75d813035a9f8238df9be11d96483667 Thanks. Xueming Li --- >From f7909e3c75d813035a9f8238df9be11d96483667 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Shihong Wang Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 10:32:47 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix Rx queue ID in Rx callback Cc: Xueming Li [ upstream commit 179e9b44ac6d64dc10ee3116e44b66f12d43e7a8 ] The Rx queue ID on the core and on the port are not necessarily equal, for example, there are two RX queues on core0, queue0 and queue1, queue0 is the rx_queueid0 on port0 and queue1 is the rx_queueid0 on port1. The 'rte_eth_add_rx_callback()' function is based on the port registration callback function, so should be the RX queue ID on the port. Fixes: d04bb1c52647 ("examples/ipsec-secgw: use HW parsed packet type in poll mode") Signed-off-by: Shihong Wang Reviewed-by: Chaoyong He Reviewed-by: Peng Zhang --- examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c index a61bea400a..45a303850d 100644 --- a/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c +++ b/examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c @@ -2093,10 +2093,10 @@ port_init(uint16_t portid, uint64_t req_rx_offloads, uint64_t req_tx_offloads, /* Register Rx callback if ptypes are not supported */ if (!ptype_supported && - !rte_eth_add_rx_callback(portid, queue, + !rte_eth_add_rx_callback(portid, rx_queueid, parse_ptype_cb, NULL)) { printf("Failed to add rx callback: port=%d, " - "queue=%d\n", portid, queue); + "rx_queueid=%d\n", portid, rx_queueid); } -- 2.34.1 --- Diff of the applied patch vs upstream commit (please double-check if non-empty: --- --- - 2024-04-13 20:43:08.386382405 +0800 +++ 0110-examples-ipsec-secgw-fix-Rx-queue-ID-in-Rx-callback.patch 2024-04-13 20:43:05.127753762 +0800 @@ -1 +1 @@ -From 179e9b44ac6d64dc10ee3116e44b66f12d43e7a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From f7909e3c75d813035a9f8238df9be11d96483667 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 @@ -4,0 +5,3 @@ +Cc: Xueming Li + +[ upstream commit 179e9b44ac6d64dc10ee3116e44b66f12d43e7a8 ] @@ -16 +18,0 @@ -Cc: stable@dpdk.org