From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E63948A44 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2025 15:39:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 668B740696; Fri, 31 Oct 2025 15:39:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2ED240150 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2025 15:39:23 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1761921563; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=4v8QseZk6TFtWgG03bwxBJyngerHm7WmXfn4uUcjKXE=; b=GLwi8zGoTlwcFb6Bc9Msya3hOJTfR1FLi6CTjtkwCl6mL4PbvpYhOy1kFn0LqTIuOWAg9D T2b7TZOoQWXyLf59/R/1x6CWYovRWUhiAJQt7xO+kzeApo4lcDqrvclyPcImkAY7hjqXwp 19nHHA8qzp+VZDM2qHw6rpv7IwyAvBU= Received: from mx-prod-mc-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-35-165-154-97.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.165.154.97]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-173-X2H8JUhiOEaoDUBTG8CFYg-1; Fri, 31 Oct 2025 10:39:22 -0400 X-MC-Unique: X2H8JUhiOEaoDUBTG8CFYg-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: X2H8JUhiOEaoDUBTG8CFYg_1761921561 Received: from mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.111]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 035F9180122A; Fri, 31 Oct 2025 14:39:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rh.redhat.com (unknown [10.44.32.50]) by mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA08180057E; Fri, 31 Oct 2025 14:39:19 +0000 (UTC) From: Kevin Traynor To: Hemant Agrawal Cc: Sachin Saxena , dpdk stable Subject: patch 'net/enetfec: reject multi-queue configuration' has been queued to stable release 24.11.4 Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 14:33:48 +0000 Message-ID: <20251031143421.324432-106-ktraynor@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20251031143421.324432-1-ktraynor@redhat.com> References: <20251031143421.324432-1-ktraynor@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.111 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: T1S0FkzFCIxyv7bQJ4mxvVZmMH_P1zXTBHXpop-bQGM_1761921561 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; x-default=true X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Hi, FYI, your patch has been queued to stable release 24.11.4 Note it hasn't been pushed to http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable yet. It will be pushed if I get no objections before 11/05/25. So please shout if anyone has objections. Also note that after the patch there's a diff of the upstream commit vs the patch applied to the branch. This will indicate if there was any rebasing needed to apply to the stable branch. If there were code changes for rebasing (ie: not only metadata diffs), please double check that the rebase was correctly done. Queued patches are on a temporary branch at: https://github.com/kevintraynor/dpdk-stable This queued commit can be viewed at: https://github.com/kevintraynor/dpdk-stable/commit/0c60dea6e6b1ade68d942b249e460889cda0b85a Thanks. Kevin --- >From 0c60dea6e6b1ade68d942b249e460889cda0b85a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hemant Agrawal Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2025 13:34:05 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] net/enetfec: reject multi-queue configuration [ upstream commit b1c162858c1efc31c8b4ac26b5943b7b8dd65bf8 ] The enetfec PMD currently supports only a single TX queue. This patch adds a check to prevent users from configuring more than one queue, ensuring predictable behavior and avoiding unsupported configurations. Fixes: bb5b5bf1e5c6 ("net/enetfec: support queue configuration") Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal Acked-by: Sachin Saxena --- drivers/net/enetfec/enet_ethdev.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/enetfec/enet_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/enetfec/enet_ethdev.c index 7d0bacdd7a..77ddc26cbc 100644 --- a/drivers/net/enetfec/enet_ethdev.c +++ b/drivers/net/enetfec/enet_ethdev.c @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ /* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause - * Copyright 2020-2021 NXP + * Copyright 2020-2021,2023 NXP */ @@ -378,4 +378,9 @@ enetfec_tx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, unsigned int dsize_log2 = rte_fls_u64(dsize) - 1; + if (queue_idx > 0) { + ENETFEC_PMD_ERR("Multi queue not supported"); + return -EINVAL; + } + /* Tx deferred start is not supported */ if (tx_conf->tx_deferred_start) { -- 2.51.0 --- Diff of the applied patch vs upstream commit (please double-check if non-empty: --- --- - 2025-10-31 13:53:55.441556717 +0000 +++ 0106-net-enetfec-reject-multi-queue-configuration.patch 2025-10-31 13:53:52.285288419 +0000 @@ -1 +1 @@ -From b1c162858c1efc31c8b4ac26b5943b7b8dd65bf8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From 0c60dea6e6b1ade68d942b249e460889cda0b85a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 @@ -5,0 +6,2 @@ +[ upstream commit b1c162858c1efc31c8b4ac26b5943b7b8dd65bf8 ] + @@ -11 +12,0 @@ -Cc: stable@dpdk.org @@ -20 +21 @@ -index 16f36a53f1..bcecab828e 100644 +index 7d0bacdd7a..77ddc26cbc 100644 @@ -37,2 +38,2 @@ - /* allocate transmit queue */ - txq = rte_zmalloc(NULL, sizeof(*txq), RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE); + /* Tx deferred start is not supported */ + if (tx_conf->tx_deferred_start) {